Geico ordered to pay Missouri woman $5.2 million after she contracted STD in a car...

The Tradition

HR King
Apr 23, 2002
110,291
82,946
113
(CNN)A Missouri woman was awarded $5.2 million in a settlement from insurance company GEICO after contracting a sexually transmitted disease from her partner in his vehicle, which was insured by the company, court documents show. The Missouri Court of Appeals upheld that award this week.

The woman, a Jackson County resident, said she contracted Human papillomavirus (HPV) from her partner, according to court documents. On Tuesday, the Missouri Court of Appeals filed an opinion confirming the initial Jackson County Circuit Court arbitration award finding against GEICO.

In February 2021, the woman -- anonymously identified in documents as M.O. -- submitted a petition to GEICO directly. She alleged that her sexual partner negligently caused or "contributed to cause to be infected with HPV by not taking proper precautions and neglecting to inform and/or disclose his diagnosis," according to court documents, and that his "insurance policy provided coverage for her injuries and losses."

She made a final settlement offer of $1 million to resolve her claims, the documents say.

In April 2021, GEICO denied coverage and refused her settlement offer, according to the Missouri Court of Appeals filing. The case was then sent to an arbitrator.

The arbitrator determined that "there was sexual activity in (insured's) automobile" that "directly caused, or directly contributed to cause" the woman to be infected with HPV, despite her former partner's knowledge of his positive HPV diagnosis, according to the filing.

The arbitrator subsequently submitted that $5.2 million would fairly compensate the woman for damages and injuries. GEICO then appealed the Jackson County Circuit Court's confirmation of the arbitration award, asserting that the court didn't give GEICO "a meaningful opportunity to defend its interests," the filing stated.

The three-judge panel responsible for reviewing the appeal confirmed the circuit court's settlement decision of $5.2 million, despite GEICO's appeal efforts, according to Tuesday's filing.

"At the time of Geico's intervention, liability and damages had been determined by an arbitrator and confirmed by the trial court. GEICO had no right to relitigate those issues," the opinion stated.

The panel also wrote that Geico could have defended its interests by entering a defense of the insured individual. "GEICO did not take advantage of this opportunity, and instead denied coverage and refused to defend Insured," the opinion said.

CNN has reached out to the attorneys for both the woman and GEICO but did not immediately hear back.

 

dgordo

HR Legend
Gold Member
Nov 15, 2001
25,050
34,502
113
Chicago
464a576f-ece4-49c9-88c8-3a7484f8f693_text.gif
 

Joes Place

HR King
Aug 28, 2003
121,441
114,128
113
Also, I'm guessing there will a few lines added to my auto insurance policy because of this.
It sounds like they denied the claim, she sued anyway and instead of showing up to court to defend, they "let it go", presuming it'd be thrown out as frivolous.

It wasn't, and that's the risk you take not showing up, because she got a summary judgement which was upheld by an arbitrator and now isn't reversible, apparently.
 

The Tradition

HR King
Apr 23, 2002
110,291
82,946
113
It sounds like they denied the claim, she sued anyway and instead of showing up to court to defend, they "let it go", presuming it'd be thrown out as frivolous.

It wasn't, and that's the risk you take not showing up, because she got a summary judgement which was upheld by an arbitrator and now isn't reversible, apparently.

Oh, well... they'll save some money after they fire their goofball lawyers.
 

Finance85

HR Legend
Oct 22, 2003
16,721
17,456
113
It sounds like they denied the claim, she sued anyway and instead of showing up to court to defend, they "let it go", presuming it'd be thrown out as frivolous.

It wasn't, and that's the risk you take not showing up, because she got a summary judgement which was upheld by an arbitrator and now isn't reversible, apparently.
Where did you come up with all that? There's nothing in the article that says Geico didn't show up. It says they didn't assert a defense.
 

Joes Place

HR King
Aug 28, 2003
121,441
114,128
113
Where did you come up with all that? There's nothing in the article that says Geico didn't show up. It says they didn't assert a defense.
That means they didn't show up to defend.
She filed a case, they didn't defend. That was AFTER they denied the claim.
 

23 so far

HR Heisman
Mar 24, 2016
9,378
16,895
113
My wife read this to me and I don't get it. How could car insurance be liable for getting STD's from sex just cause you had it in a car.
Because Geico has money and the broke dick she screwed doesn't.

What's worse yet, is several Fing Judges and an "arbitrator" agreed with her. You can't make this shit up. Only in America can you get this kind of lunacy.

State Farm was so alarmed by this news Jake from State Farm is White again.............and Aaron Rodgers said "F it, I'm gonna date a Witch!"
 

The Tradition

HR King
Apr 23, 2002
110,291
82,946
113
Because Geico has money and the broke dick she screwed doesn't.

What's worse yet, is several Fing Judges and an "arbitrator" agreed with her. You can't make this shit up. Only in America can you get this kind of lunacy.

State Farm was so alarmed by this news Jake from State Farm is White again.............and Aaron Rodgers said "F it, I'm gonna date a Witch!"

Farmers Insurance guy: "We know a thing or two because we've seen a thing or two... but we've never seen THAT!"
 
Last edited: