ADVERTISEMENT

Gov. Reynolds leads a full assault on civil rights in Iowa

cigaretteman

HR King
May 29, 2001
77,442
58,934
113
For one brief moment, it seemed as if the Legislature knew it had gone too far — that repealing gender identity from the civil rights act was unacceptable. We are a state with a long history of proud civil rights achievements — such as eliminating segregation 100 years before the rest of the country.



Gov. Kim Reynolds decided that if the legislature didn’t end civil rights in Iowa she would personally lead the charge. Her bill HSB 649 would reinstate ‘separate but equal’ and functionally erase transgender people from Iowa Law.


Reynolds says that she wants to protect women.





However, a telling moment happened when the House was reviewing the legislation.


Rep. Sharon Steckman, D- Mason City, asked the governor’s aid whether any domestic violence shelters were consulted what problems and needs they had, and whether the governor had had spoken to any trans Iowans.


The governor’s aide simply responded with a boilerplate text “Just as like the governor and the Legislature did protecting women’s and girls' sports the bill is necessary to protect women.”


Which is an admission that they didn’t consult anyone save the Heritage Foundation and the worst parts of Twitter.


Because the facts are inconvenient to the governor’s feelings. Because there likely are no instances of transwomen going to domestic abuse shelters to abuse women and there are no instances of men pretending to be trans to gain access to these spaces to do the same.


Moreover, anti-trans laws increase harassment of women in women’s spaces as happened after the 2016 North Carolina bathroom bill, because right-wing grifters are always trying to catch a trans in the bathroom (which is just gross) any woman who doesn’t meet their insane and often contradictory criteria for how a woman should look or act is at risk of harassment.





.


This bill will put men in women’s spaces, though not in the way the governor thinks. Because trans men exist (assigned female at birth and transitioning to male later), the inane wording of this law requires that transmen be put in women’s space.


It’s a stupid bill.


Reynolds and members of the Legislature traffic in the same tired slander that trans women are predators and they fearmonger because that is the only way they can eliminate civil rights in Iowa and hide the failures that their policies have had for Iowans.


The governor’s record for protecting women itself is atrocious, which she well knows. Reynolds deprived Iowa women of bodily autonomy when she personally sought to end abortion rights, knowing full well that these laws make pregnancy more dangerous as they force women to carry unviable pregnancies to the point where they are on the verge of death before they can get abortion care and maybe not even then.


Anti-abortion laws keep the best OBGYNs out of the state. This has a further knock-on effect that screening for cervical, uterine, and ovarian will be delayed or missed, and don’t forget Iowa has one of the highest cancer rates in the U.S. To say nothing of the expanding maternity care deserts that spread throughout Iowa.


When it comes to abusing women rights, Reynolds is one of the biggest offenders If she truly wanted to protect women she would resign because her legacy has produced the single greatest rollback to women’s rights in a century.


It shouldn’t be a surprise that Reynolds dusted off transphobia the moment she knew that her unpopular AEA bill was in trouble. The Iowa House held hearings on both the AEA and gender identity bills on the same day and time with the same result.


The trans community in Iowa is Reynolds’ favorite punching bag because we only make up 0.29% of the population and there’s a whole right-wing media ecosystem ready to slander us.


Reynolds says the only way to protect women’s rights is to eliminate trans rights. Yet this is a false choice. The alibi of tyrants is to claim only they can protect you while destroying the rights and lives of others.


This is what fascism looks like.


Fascism by the simplest definition is conform … or else.


Our government is weaponizing it’s power against its citizens because people have stood up against their policies.


And trans people aren’t the only targets. They attack us overtly, but they are covertly attacking others by moving the following bills to — defund the AEAs (SSB 3073), engage in union busting (SSB 3158), defunding, harming public libraries (HSB 678) and erasing gender parity on state boards (SF2096).


The greatest mistake anyone can make in the face of authoritarianism is to say it doesn’t or can’t affect them. Across the world, authoritarian parties often purge members of their own parties first and systematically attack all who don’t fall in line after.


Personally, speaking as an American — I reject conformity. I reject Reynolds’ attempts to erase us in the eyes of the law. And I sure as heck reject any attempts by this Legislature to reduce queer Iowans to second class status.


Reynolds and her allies in the Legislature no longer represent Iowa’s most sacred values “Our liberties we prize and our rights we will maintain.” I ask you to write, post, and call out Gov. Reynolds and remind her that liberty and justice for all is not optional.


It is up to Iowans to stop this and once again I must call upon Iowans to oppose this law in every way possible. Write your representatives, talk about this on social media, stand with the trans community during our darkest hour, and then vote the autocrats out of office in November.


Aime J. Wichtendahl is the first openly transwoman elected in Iowa — serving on the Hiawatha City Council. She is a candidate for the Iowa House in District 80.

 
For one brief moment, it seemed as if the Legislature knew it had gone too far — that repealing gender identity from the civil rights act was unacceptable. We are a state with a long history of proud civil rights achievements — such as eliminating segregation 100 years before the rest of the country.



Gov. Kim Reynolds decided that if the legislature didn’t end civil rights in Iowa she would personally lead the charge. Her bill HSB 649 would reinstate ‘separate but equal’ and functionally erase transgender people from Iowa Law.


Reynolds says that she wants to protect women.





However, a telling moment happened when the House was reviewing the legislation.


Rep. Sharon Steckman, D- Mason City, asked the governor’s aid whether any domestic violence shelters were consulted what problems and needs they had, and whether the governor had had spoken to any trans Iowans.


The governor’s aide simply responded with a boilerplate text “Just as like the governor and the Legislature did protecting women’s and girls' sports the bill is necessary to protect women.”


Which is an admission that they didn’t consult anyone save the Heritage Foundation and the worst parts of Twitter.


Because the facts are inconvenient to the governor’s feelings. Because there likely are no instances of transwomen going to domestic abuse shelters to abuse women and there are no instances of men pretending to be trans to gain access to these spaces to do the same.


Moreover, anti-trans laws increase harassment of women in women’s spaces as happened after the 2016 North Carolina bathroom bill, because right-wing grifters are always trying to catch a trans in the bathroom (which is just gross) any woman who doesn’t meet their insane and often contradictory criteria for how a woman should look or act is at risk of harassment.





.


This bill will put men in women’s spaces, though not in the way the governor thinks. Because trans men exist (assigned female at birth and transitioning to male later), the inane wording of this law requires that transmen be put in women’s space.


It’s a stupid bill.


Reynolds and members of the Legislature traffic in the same tired slander that trans women are predators and they fearmonger because that is the only way they can eliminate civil rights in Iowa and hide the failures that their policies have had for Iowans.


The governor’s record for protecting women itself is atrocious, which she well knows. Reynolds deprived Iowa women of bodily autonomy when she personally sought to end abortion rights, knowing full well that these laws make pregnancy more dangerous as they force women to carry unviable pregnancies to the point where they are on the verge of death before they can get abortion care and maybe not even then.


Anti-abortion laws keep the best OBGYNs out of the state. This has a further knock-on effect that screening for cervical, uterine, and ovarian will be delayed or missed, and don’t forget Iowa has one of the highest cancer rates in the U.S. To say nothing of the expanding maternity care deserts that spread throughout Iowa.


When it comes to abusing women rights, Reynolds is one of the biggest offenders If she truly wanted to protect women she would resign because her legacy has produced the single greatest rollback to women’s rights in a century.


It shouldn’t be a surprise that Reynolds dusted off transphobia the moment she knew that her unpopular AEA bill was in trouble. The Iowa House held hearings on both the AEA and gender identity bills on the same day and time with the same result.


The trans community in Iowa is Reynolds’ favorite punching bag because we only make up 0.29% of the population and there’s a whole right-wing media ecosystem ready to slander us.


Reynolds says the only way to protect women’s rights is to eliminate trans rights. Yet this is a false choice. The alibi of tyrants is to claim only they can protect you while destroying the rights and lives of others.


This is what fascism looks like.


Fascism by the simplest definition is conform … or else.


Our government is weaponizing it’s power against its citizens because people have stood up against their policies.


And trans people aren’t the only targets. They attack us overtly, but they are covertly attacking others by moving the following bills to — defund the AEAs (SSB 3073), engage in union busting (SSB 3158), defunding, harming public libraries (HSB 678) and erasing gender parity on state boards (SF2096).


The greatest mistake anyone can make in the face of authoritarianism is to say it doesn’t or can’t affect them. Across the world, authoritarian parties often purge members of their own parties first and systematically attack all who don’t fall in line after.


Personally, speaking as an American — I reject conformity. I reject Reynolds’ attempts to erase us in the eyes of the law. And I sure as heck reject any attempts by this Legislature to reduce queer Iowans to second class status.


Reynolds and her allies in the Legislature no longer represent Iowa’s most sacred values “Our liberties we prize and our rights we will maintain.” I ask you to write, post, and call out Gov. Reynolds and remind her that liberty and justice for all is not optional.


It is up to Iowans to stop this and once again I must call upon Iowans to oppose this law in every way possible. Write your representatives, talk about this on social media, stand with the trans community during our darkest hour, and then vote the autocrats out of office in November.


Aime J. Wichtendahl is the first openly transwoman elected in Iowa — serving on the Hiawatha City Council. She is a candidate for the Iowa House in District 80.

What a tool.
 
Nope.
The loser that posts all the time here that was convicted twice.
Oh, I just know Kim had several drunk driving incidents. And, I have seen the comments directed at Chis, but he's not in this thread so I was confused. Carry on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mthawkeyes
For one brief moment, it seemed as if the Legislature knew it had gone too far — that repealing gender identity from the civil rights act was unacceptable. We are a state with a long history of proud civil rights achievements — such as eliminating segregation 100 years before the rest of the country.



Gov. Kim Reynolds decided that if the legislature didn’t end civil rights in Iowa she would personally lead the charge. Her bill HSB 649 would reinstate ‘separate but equal’ and functionally erase transgender people from Iowa Law.


Reynolds says that she wants to protect women.





However, a telling moment happened when the House was reviewing the legislation.


Rep. Sharon Steckman, D- Mason City, asked the governor’s aid whether any domestic violence shelters were consulted what problems and needs they had, and whether the governor had had spoken to any trans Iowans.


The governor’s aide simply responded with a boilerplate text “Just as like the governor and the Legislature did protecting women’s and girls' sports the bill is necessary to protect women.”


Which is an admission that they didn’t consult anyone save the Heritage Foundation and the worst parts of Twitter.


Because the facts are inconvenient to the governor’s feelings. Because there likely are no instances of transwomen going to domestic abuse shelters to abuse women and there are no instances of men pretending to be trans to gain access to these spaces to do the same.


Moreover, anti-trans laws increase harassment of women in women’s spaces as happened after the 2016 North Carolina bathroom bill, because right-wing grifters are always trying to catch a trans in the bathroom (which is just gross) any woman who doesn’t meet their insane and often contradictory criteria for how a woman should look or act is at risk of harassment.





.


This bill will put men in women’s spaces, though not in the way the governor thinks. Because trans men exist (assigned female at birth and transitioning to male later), the inane wording of this law requires that transmen be put in women’s space.


It’s a stupid bill.


Reynolds and members of the Legislature traffic in the same tired slander that trans women are predators and they fearmonger because that is the only way they can eliminate civil rights in Iowa and hide the failures that their policies have had for Iowans.


The governor’s record for protecting women itself is atrocious, which she well knows. Reynolds deprived Iowa women of bodily autonomy when she personally sought to end abortion rights, knowing full well that these laws make pregnancy more dangerous as they force women to carry unviable pregnancies to the point where they are on the verge of death before they can get abortion care and maybe not even then.


Anti-abortion laws keep the best OBGYNs out of the state. This has a further knock-on effect that screening for cervical, uterine, and ovarian will be delayed or missed, and don’t forget Iowa has one of the highest cancer rates in the U.S. To say nothing of the expanding maternity care deserts that spread throughout Iowa.


When it comes to abusing women rights, Reynolds is one of the biggest offenders If she truly wanted to protect women she would resign because her legacy has produced the single greatest rollback to women’s rights in a century.


It shouldn’t be a surprise that Reynolds dusted off transphobia the moment she knew that her unpopular AEA bill was in trouble. The Iowa House held hearings on both the AEA and gender identity bills on the same day and time with the same result.


The trans community in Iowa is Reynolds’ favorite punching bag because we only make up 0.29% of the population and there’s a whole right-wing media ecosystem ready to slander us.


Reynolds says the only way to protect women’s rights is to eliminate trans rights. Yet this is a false choice. The alibi of tyrants is to claim only they can protect you while destroying the rights and lives of others.


This is what fascism looks like.


Fascism by the simplest definition is conform … or else.


Our government is weaponizing it’s power against its citizens because people have stood up against their policies.


And trans people aren’t the only targets. They attack us overtly, but they are covertly attacking others by moving the following bills to — defund the AEAs (SSB 3073), engage in union busting (SSB 3158), defunding, harming public libraries (HSB 678) and erasing gender parity on state boards (SF2096).


The greatest mistake anyone can make in the face of authoritarianism is to say it doesn’t or can’t affect them. Across the world, authoritarian parties often purge members of their own parties first and systematically attack all who don’t fall in line after.


Personally, speaking as an American — I reject conformity. I reject Reynolds’ attempts to erase us in the eyes of the law. And I sure as heck reject any attempts by this Legislature to reduce queer Iowans to second class status.


Reynolds and her allies in the Legislature no longer represent Iowa’s most sacred values “Our liberties we prize and our rights we will maintain.” I ask you to write, post, and call out Gov. Reynolds and remind her that liberty and justice for all is not optional.


It is up to Iowans to stop this and once again I must call upon Iowans to oppose this law in every way possible. Write your representatives, talk about this on social media, stand with the trans community during our darkest hour, and then vote the autocrats out of office in November.


Aime J. Wichtendahl is the first openly transwoman elected in Iowa — serving on the Hiawatha City Council. She is a candidate for the Iowa House in District 80.

Transgenderism is not a protected class, it's a mental illness. To try and claim it is the same as homosexuality is sick. If a person identifies as a cat, would you feel the same?
 
For one brief moment, it seemed as if the Legislature knew it had gone too far — that repealing gender identity from the civil rights act was unacceptable. We are a state with a long history of proud civil rights achievements — such as eliminating segregation 100 years before the rest of the country.



Gov. Kim Reynolds decided that if the legislature didn’t end civil rights in Iowa she would personally lead the charge. Her bill HSB 649 would reinstate ‘separate but equal’ and functionally erase transgender people from Iowa Law.


Reynolds says that she wants to protect women.





However, a telling moment happened when the House was reviewing the legislation.


Rep. Sharon Steckman, D- Mason City, asked the governor’s aid whether any domestic violence shelters were consulted what problems and needs they had, and whether the governor had had spoken to any trans Iowans.


The governor’s aide simply responded with a boilerplate text “Just as like the governor and the Legislature did protecting women’s and girls' sports the bill is necessary to protect women.”


Which is an admission that they didn’t consult anyone save the Heritage Foundation and the worst parts of Twitter.


Because the facts are inconvenient to the governor’s feelings. Because there likely are no instances of transwomen going to domestic abuse shelters to abuse women and there are no instances of men pretending to be trans to gain access to these spaces to do the same.


Moreover, anti-trans laws increase harassment of women in women’s spaces as happened after the 2016 North Carolina bathroom bill, because right-wing grifters are always trying to catch a trans in the bathroom (which is just gross) any woman who doesn’t meet their insane and often contradictory criteria for how a woman should look or act is at risk of harassment.





.


This bill will put men in women’s spaces, though not in the way the governor thinks. Because trans men exist (assigned female at birth and transitioning to male later), the inane wording of this law requires that transmen be put in women’s space.


It’s a stupid bill.


Reynolds and members of the Legislature traffic in the same tired slander that trans women are predators and they fearmonger because that is the only way they can eliminate civil rights in Iowa and hide the failures that their policies have had for Iowans.


The governor’s record for protecting women itself is atrocious, which she well knows. Reynolds deprived Iowa women of bodily autonomy when she personally sought to end abortion rights, knowing full well that these laws make pregnancy more dangerous as they force women to carry unviable pregnancies to the point where they are on the verge of death before they can get abortion care and maybe not even then.


Anti-abortion laws keep the best OBGYNs out of the state. This has a further knock-on effect that screening for cervical, uterine, and ovarian will be delayed or missed, and don’t forget Iowa has one of the highest cancer rates in the U.S. To say nothing of the expanding maternity care deserts that spread throughout Iowa.


When it comes to abusing women rights, Reynolds is one of the biggest offenders If she truly wanted to protect women she would resign because her legacy has produced the single greatest rollback to women’s rights in a century.


It shouldn’t be a surprise that Reynolds dusted off transphobia the moment she knew that her unpopular AEA bill was in trouble. The Iowa House held hearings on both the AEA and gender identity bills on the same day and time with the same result.


The trans community in Iowa is Reynolds’ favorite punching bag because we only make up 0.29% of the population and there’s a whole right-wing media ecosystem ready to slander us.


Reynolds says the only way to protect women’s rights is to eliminate trans rights. Yet this is a false choice. The alibi of tyrants is to claim only they can protect you while destroying the rights and lives of others.


This is what fascism looks like.


Fascism by the simplest definition is conform … or else.


Our government is weaponizing it’s power against its citizens because people have stood up against their policies.


And trans people aren’t the only targets. They attack us overtly, but they are covertly attacking others by moving the following bills to — defund the AEAs (SSB 3073), engage in union busting (SSB 3158), defunding, harming public libraries (HSB 678) and erasing gender parity on state boards (SF2096).


The greatest mistake anyone can make in the face of authoritarianism is to say it doesn’t or can’t affect them. Across the world, authoritarian parties often purge members of their own parties first and systematically attack all who don’t fall in line after.


Personally, speaking as an American — I reject conformity. I reject Reynolds’ attempts to erase us in the eyes of the law. And I sure as heck reject any attempts by this Legislature to reduce queer Iowans to second class status.


Reynolds and her allies in the Legislature no longer represent Iowa’s most sacred values “Our liberties we prize and our rights we will maintain.” I ask you to write, post, and call out Gov. Reynolds and remind her that liberty and justice for all is not optional.


It is up to Iowans to stop this and once again I must call upon Iowans to oppose this law in every way possible. Write your representatives, talk about this on social media, stand with the trans community during our darkest hour, and then vote the autocrats out of office in November.


Aime J. Wichtendahl is the first openly transwoman elected in Iowa — serving on the Hiawatha City Council. She is a candidate for the Iowa House in District 80.

Your article is complete BS.

There is and can be only 2 sexes and those are 100% determined by chromosomes.

This bill simply "outs" the mental illness that permeates a small percentage of the Iowa population. It protects the sane from the insane.

Those who oppose this bill can do the following:

1.) learn to accept it

2.) move out of state

 
Transgenderism is not a protected class, it's a mental illness. To try and claim it is the same as homosexuality is sick. If a person identifies as a cat, would yOne for the money
One for the money, two for the show, three to get ready, now go cat go!
 
Your article is complete BS.

There is and can be only 2 sexes and those are 100% determined by chromosomes.

This bill simply "outs" the mental illness that permeates a small percentage of the Iowa population. It protects the sane from the insane.

Those who oppose this bill can do the following:

1.) learn to accept it

2.) move out of state
Ever heard of a baby born as a hermaphrodite? Very rare so that's probably why you haven't. Doesn't fit into your "facts.
 
Ever heard of a baby born as a hermaphrodite? Very rare so that's probably why you haven't. Doesn't fit into your "facts.
That's the exception to the clause. What maybe a 0.00___ % are born this way. But now you've tried to include people who have one or the other chromosomes into a tiny percent who really have the issue.

TRY AGAIN. This is not a good argument.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RicoSuave102954
That's the exception to the clause. What maybe a 0.00___ % are born this way. But now you've tried to include people who have one or the other chromosomes into a tiny percent who really have the issue.

TRY AGAIN. This is not a good argument.
What's the argument FOR granting legal protections to those who wish to demean and dehumanize a small minority of people?
 
What's the argument FOR granting legal protections to those who wish to demean and dehumanize a small minority of people?
The citizens of Iowa demand and deserve a modicum of sanity to prevail with the borders of this great state. Letting insane people to become the norm is not the Iowa way. If someone chooses to dehumanize themselves maybe they should go somewhere else to do it.
 
That's the exception to the clause. What maybe a 0.00___ % are born this way. But now you've tried to include people who have one or the other chromosomes into a tiny percent who really have the issue.

TRY AGAIN. This is not a good argument.
So what about having to put the gender of birth on the B.C.?
 
That's the exception to the clause. What maybe a 0.00___ % are born this way. But now you've tried to include people who have one or the other chromosomes into a tiny percent who really have the issue.

TRY AGAIN. This is not a good argument.

That’s your basis to support such hate filled legislation, because it’s targeting a minority population then it’s allowable? Seriously?

I’m sure people like you can apply similar logic across a diverse set of minority groups that you don’t care for as well. What an admirable moral construct you’ve created in your confused mind.

And just for accuracy’s sake, about 1% of all births result in physical traits and deviations from what is considered “normal”, so your conjectured occurrence rate is off by at least a factor of 100. Not that you really give a shit.
 
That’s your basis to support such hate filled legislation, because it’s targeting a minority population then it’s allowable? Seriously?

I’m sure people like you can apply similar logic across a diverse set of minority groups that you don’t care for as well. What an admirable moral construct you’ve created in your confused mind.

And just for accuracy’s sake, about 1% of all births result in physical traits and deviations from what is considered “normal”, so your conjectured occurrence rate is off by at least a factor of 100. Not that you really give a shit.
You're projecting things that aren't true.

They are a minority and in a Constitutional Republic they should be protected.

But all the science in the work can't change chromosomes. So, they are either a male or female. Let's not make up words to call people. How they choose to dress. act or want to be is 100% their choice and they that the God given right to do so. I also have the God given right to call people male or female and don't feel that they need to be in the opposite sexes' bathrooms or sporting events. That not hatred, it's protecting the innocent.
 
Last edited:
You're projecting things that aren't true.

They are a minority and in a Constitutional Republic they should be protected.

But all the science in the work can't change chromosomes. So, they are either a male or female. Let's not make up words to call people. How they choose to dress. act or want to be is 100% they're choice and they that the God given right to do so. I also have the God given right to call people male or female and don't feel that they need to be in the opposite sexes' bathrooms or sporting events. That not hatred, it's protecting the innocent.
Post of the year material!!!
 
You're projecting things that aren't true.

They are a minority and in a Constitutional Republic they should be protected.

But all the science in the work can't change chromosomes. So, they are either a male or female. Let's not make up words to call people. How they choose to dress. act or want to be is 100% they're choice and they that the God given right to do so. I also have the God given right to call people male or female and don't feel that they need to be in the opposite sexes' bathrooms or sporting events. That not hatred, it's protecting the innocent.
You just don't get it, intersex status goes far beyond just your genetic/chromosomal makeup. Crafting laws to address a largely fictional fear you obsess over doesn't add validity to the necessity for such legislation.

Protecting the innocent my ass.
 
You just don't get it, intersex status goes far beyond just your genetic/chromosomal makeup. Crafting laws to address a largely fictional fear you obsess over doesn't add validity to the necessity for such legislation.

Protecting the innocent my ass.
Fictional is denying the facts of chromosomes. So, men can just go into women's bathrooms all willy-nilly? DUDES should not be competing in women's sports, going in women's Lockeroom while women are present and going into women's restrooms period! If you believe that they should, then let's get rid of Title IX because there is no longer a point to it.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT