ADVERTISEMENT

Governors of Michigan, Alabama reject resettlement of Syrian refugees in their states

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
79,363
62,375
113
Thanks for letting the terrorists win, Govs!:

The terrorist attacks in Paris have prompted two governors to announce that Syrian refugees will not be allowed to resettle in their states.

Gov. Rick Snyder of Michigan and Gov. Robert Bentley of Alabama, both Republicans, issued individual statements Sunday declaring that their states would not be open to refugees fleeing the conflict in Syria.

Noting Michigan’s “rich history of immigration,” Snyder’s statement said, “But our first priority is protecting the safety of our residents.”

[Aaron Rodgers praised for criticizing fan’s anti-Muslim comments]

“It’s also important to remember that these attacks are the efforts of extremists and do not reflect the peaceful ways of people of Middle Eastern descent here and around the world,” he said.

Snyder had previously been working with the federal government to determine a process for accepting refugees. “Isn’t that part of being a good Michigander?” he told the Detroit Free Press in late September, pointing out the economic and humanitarian benefits of welcoming Syrians.

Snyder said those efforts would now be suspended until further evidence of more rigid security measures.

His reversal follows a statement from Michigan state Rep. Gary Glenn, also a Republican, who said Saturday that the state “should not rush to offer an open door to the high-risk importation of individuals from a known hotbed of Islamic extremism.”

Michigan is home to a sizable Middle Eastern population, with the Detroit metro area having one of the largest in the country. Earlier this month, the city of Hamtramck, Mich., elected America’s first Muslim-majority city council.

According to the Free Press, many Syrians have already settled in Michigan, where 200 have been relocated by one agency in the past year.

In Alabama, no Syrian refugees have been relocated — and none will be allowed to settle there in the future, Bentley said in his statement.

“As your Governor, I will not stand complicit to a policy that places the citizens of Alabama in harm’s way,” he declared. “The acts of terror committed over the weekend are a tragic reminder to the world that evil exists and takes the form of terrorists who seek to destroy the basic freedoms we will always fight to preserve.”

Legally, the states have limited power to control the flow of foreigners into their states, with that authority reserved largely to the federal government under the Constitution. In early September, the Obama administration said it would at least accept 10,000 Syrian refugees during the federal government’s 2015 fiscal year.

At the same time, leaders in Canada and Australia have so far stood their ground on promises to welcome refugees, though they acknowledge the situation has been complicated by the Paris attacks.

An official from the office of Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said Saturday that the administration will move forward with its plans to accept 25,000 Syrian refugees by the end of the year. The announcement defies growing concern over the security risks of meeting such an early deadline.

Australia’s immigration minister, Peter Dutton, also denied a request from a member of Parliament to renege on a plan to accept 12,000 refugees from Syria and Iraq.

“Australia does not need Middle Eastern refugees or Islamic boat people!” MP Andrew Fraser wrote in a public Facebook message to Dutton, the BBC reports. “Close our borders we have enough anarchists already resident in Australia.”

Dutton told Australia’s Seven Network that while additional security checks may be implemented in light of the attacks, “Australia obviously faces a very different situation than in countries in Europe that have land borders.”

Police are investigating a Syrian passport found near the spot where suicide bombers blew themselves up outside France’s national stadium. Greek authorities have traced the passport to a refugee who was among the 198 that arrived at Leros, an Aegean island, by way of a migrant boat on Oct. 3.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...syrian-refugees-in-their-states/?tid=pm_pop_b
 
They will settle in, their Imans will start preaching hate, they will never assimilate. They will create problems.

Well, the only real question is when are we going to start championing the building of Mosques with loud speakers on the outside so that we all know when it's time to start praying 5 times a day and hear the hate speech?

In a weird way, I kind of miss that.
 
I'm not sure they have the authority to do that....
I was wondering the same. OTOH, does the executive branch have the authority to force them absent Congressional action?

What if we just give the refugees green cards (or whatever the appropriate status would be) and let them go where they want? What's the governor of Alabama going to do if they decide to head there? Meet them with dogs and axe handles?

Working it out between feds and states seems sensible to me.

This refugee problem is an outgrowth of our foreign policy and military adventurism in the Middle East. If I am prez and you don't play ball on taking some refugees, you'd better not have any military contracts or bases in your state. Because they are getting cut or moved.
 
Add Indiana, Texas, Arkansas and Louisiana to the list.

Oklahoma, Miss, Georgia, Tenn, Kentucky, WV, SC, NC and Florida will be next I am guessing.

What about IOWA?
 
You sound like you've lived in Europe for a while.

It's not that but the times I've been in Paris and been in places like London, the muslim community is in large ghettos over there. They just don't blend in well.
 
Rauner brings the total to 8 states led by Republican governors. Way to let the terrorist win Republicans!:

— Gov. Bruce Rauner announced Monday that Illinois will temporarily stop taking in new Syrian refugees, joining seven other Republican governors in the wake of the Paris attacks.

Rauner's decision comes after officials said at least one of the Paris attackers entered Europe amid the recent influx of migrants from the war-torn country.

"Our nation and our state have a shared history of providing safe haven for those displaced by conflict, but the news surrounding the Paris terror attacks reminds us of the all-too-real security threats facing America," Rauner said in a statement. "We must find a way to balance our tradition as a state welcoming of refugees while ensuring the safety and security of our citizens."

Rauner said his office will "consider all of our legal options" as the U.S. Department of Homeland Security undergoes a review of acceptance and security processes.

As of September, 94 refugees from Syria have been resettled in Illinois, including 62 in Chicago, according to the Refugee Processing Center, operated by the U.S. State Department. That's about three times as many in all of 2014, though those numbers don't include Syrians seeking asylum, which is a separate process.

The other states to impose a temporary ban despite President Barack Obama's opposition are Texas, Michigan, Alabama, Arkansas, Indiana, Louisiana and Massachusetts.

Here is Rauner's full statement:

"Our nation and our state have a shared history of providing safe haven for those displaced by conflict, but the news surrounding the Paris terror attacks reminds us of the all-too-real security threats facing America. We must find a way to balance our tradition as a state welcoming of refugees while ensuring the safety and security of our citizens. Therefore, the state of Illinois will temporarily suspend accepting new Syrian refugees and consider all of our legal options pending a full review of our country's acceptance and security processes by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security."

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...fugees-suspended-met-1117-20151116-story.html
 
Will this cause States to to pull away from Federal mandates and such? I could see if push comes to shove that some States (Texas comes to mind) will just step away.
 
You are going to see Democratic Governors, Senators, House members coming out against Obama on this.

HRC better change her tune or this alone could cost her the election if there is a terrorist attack on our soil in the next 11 months.
 
Now up to 13, all with Republican governors:

Governors across the country are scrambling to close off their states to resettled Syrian refugees in the wake of the deadly terror attacks in Paris that are linked to Islamic State extremists.

The list of states climbed quickly to 13 by midday Monday, even as President Obama said that the U.S. would continue to accept refugees and denounced efforts to those fleeing violence from coming to the United States as "shameful."

Governors of Illinois, Ohio, Florida, North Carolina, New Hampshire, Arizona, Indiana, Massachusetts, Louisiana, Michigan, Alabama, Texas and Arkansas — all of them Republicans — have said that they are seeking to stop the relocation of new Syrian refugees to their states out of fear that violent extremists posing as refugees might gain entry to the country.

In Michigan, a state with a large population of Muslims, Gov. Rick Snyder noted that the state has a "rich history of immigration" and that extremists "do not reflect the peaceful ways of people of Middle Eastern descent here and around the world,"

But, Snyder added, “our first priority is protecting the safety of our residents.”

The move has also quickly become political, with Republican presidential candidate and Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal the first of the governors in the race to block refugees in his own state.

"I just signed an Executive Order instructing state agencies to take all available steps to stop the relocation of Syrian refugees to LA," Jindal tweeted.


It is not clear, however, what governors could actually do to stop refugees from resettling in their states. Resettlement applications are handled by the U.S. State Department. The process takes between 18 and 24 months, and applicants are screened by the Department of Homeland Security and interviewed before being approved to relocate to the U.S.

In a statement, presidential hopeful and Ohio Gov. John Kasich said that he opposed resettling Syrian refugees in Ohio and has written to Obama asking him to stop sending refugees to his state, suggesting that he does not have the power to unilaterally halt the process himself.

"The governor doesn’t believe the U.S. should accept additional Syrian refugees because security and safety issues cannot be adequately addressed," Kasich spokesman Jim Lynch said. "The governor is writing to the President to ask him to stop, and to ask him to stop resettling them in Ohio."

"We are also looking at what additional steps Ohio can take to stop resettlement of these refugees,” he added.

And in a letter to House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), Florida Gov. Rick Scott noted that the states would not have the power to halt federal funds from going toward resettling as many as 425 refugees in his state.

"It is our understanding that the state does not have the authority to prevent the federal government from funding the relocation of these Syrian refugees to Florida even without state support," Scott wrote. "Therefore, we are asking the United States Congress to take immediate and aggressive action" to prevent Obama and his administration from funding Syrian refugee relocation to the United States.

Another governor in the presidential race, Chris Christie (R-N.J.), has not yet weighed in.

Some presidential candidates, like Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.), have suggested that it is too risky to admit Muslim refugees.

Obama responded at a news conference during the G-20 summit in Turkey that the suggestion was un-American.

"The United States has to step up and do its part," Obama said. "And when I hear folks say that, well, maybe we should just admit the Christians but not the Muslims, when I hear political leaders suggesting that there would be a religious test for which person who's fleeing from a war-torn country is admitted, when some of those folks themselves come from families who benefited from protection when they were fleeing political persecution, that's shameful."

"That's not American, it's not who we are," he added.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...vernors-rush-to-slam-door-on-syrian-refugees/
 
Obviously this is just for political theater on behalf of the governors involved, but why stop at Syria? There is a list of countries as long as my arm that 80% of Americans wouldn't bat an eye at if there was an executive order barring refugees from those places. Not that it would stop anything when some suburban white kid decides to take up the mantle and head out for target practice...
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
They will settle in, their Imans will start preaching hate, they will never assimilate. They will create problems.
There were two Syrian families in our mid sized town when I was in HS. (long ago) The kids seemed to assimilate well, wrestling team, student government , etc. I never knew what religion they were. Possibly they were Christian. There are and were Christian arabs. My kids went to HS with Pakistani kids who seemed to participate in HS things, probably were Muslim and also dr's kids. I think the number living in a particular area as well as income level can play a part in assimilation. Also nowadays, with its technology people can live move away from the home country and never really leave, except physically.
 
just remember...they all have daughters....here's a nice Syrian girl...

3eKvlgi.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: moral_victory
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT