ADVERTISEMENT

Gun nut playing with gun in theater shoots woman, runs

Definitely sounds like a conservative.

Do you think we should have evidence or just go with our gut feelings?
 
When are you going to post stories about the liberals on the south side of Chicago doing all the drive by shootings?
 
You're right. A conservative would take responsibility for his actions unlike the liberals in Chicago who shoot each other daily.
 
You're right. A conservative would take responsibility for his actions unlike the liberals in Chicago who shoot each other daily.

Maybe NEITHER should have guns in public. How is "Protecting your family from home invasion" at all similar to shooting people at will in a movie theatre. There should be NO guns allowed in public. If you're really looking to protect your family and home, keep the gun at HOME.

I know we'll hear "Guns don't kill people" and I'll agree. Idiots that own guns kill people and they are all over this once great country.
 
You're right. A conservative would take responsibility for his actions unlike the liberals in Chicago who shoot each other daily.

Bullshit. The coward in this story RAN! You are pathetic and have no working mind of your own. Go back to your conservative masters and get a stupid line to respond with and we'll all wait here.
 
Maybe NEITHER should have guns in public. How is "Protecting your family from home invasion" at all similar to shooting people at will in a movie theatre. There should be NO guns allowed in public. If you're really looking to protect your family and home, keep the gun at HOME.

I know we'll hear "Guns don't kill people" and I'll agree. Idiots that own guns kill people and they are all over this once great country.

You're almost there buddy. Nobody has died in this situation. The offender turned himself in and will be punished. Life will go on. There's idiots who get behind the wheel drunk and kill people. Should we keep cars at home too?
 
Bullshit. The coward in this story RAN! You are pathetic and have no working mind of your own. Go back to your conservative masters and get a stupid line to respond with and we'll all wait here.

So you mean the guy was scared about what had happened and in the heat of the moment ran? Shocker!

Are you ignoring the fact that he turned himself in?
 
You're right. A conservative would take responsibility for his actions unlike the liberals in Chicago who shoot each other daily.
Those guys should be your heroes. Their business is important. They like their guns. They want to see their business grow. They do anything to make it grow. And they care nothing about the common man other than what they can sell or force them to buy. They seem very much like today's conservatives.
 
You're almost there buddy. Nobody has died in this situation. The offender turned himself in and will be punished. Life will go on. There's idiots who get behind the wheel drunk and kill people. Should we keep cars at home too?
Good God, not this stupid car comparison again. How many times does this thing need to get smoked?
 
Those guys should be your heroes. Their business is important. They like their guns. They want to see their business grow. They do anything to make it grow. And they care nothing about the common man other than what they can sell or force them to buy. They seem very much like today's conservatives.

So you agree that the liberals in Chicago who murder innocent children and women don't take responsibility for their actions?
 
So you agree that the liberals in Chicago who murder innocent children and women don't take responsibility for their actions?
If you would learn to read and had the ability to understand, I think you would realize they are capitalists that people like you worship. Not sure they are liberals.
 
Good God, not this stupid car comparison again. How many times does this thing need to get smoked?

One... It's never gotten smoked. Why? Because a gun and a car are two things that cannot kill people without being operated by humans. If they just sat there without anyone or thing touching them, they can literally not do any harm to anyone or any thing.

Two... The only real difference in this situation vs a drunk driver is the car and the gun.

So lets hear it!
 
If you would learn to read and had the ability to understand, I think you would realize they are capitalists that people like you worship. Not sure they are liberals.

Capitalists don't cash a welfare check. Sorry.

It is interesting how your mind works though. Like most liberals, you ignore common sense.
 
In most states, it is illegal to handle a firearm while intoxicated.

So, this is not a law-abiding gun owner.
 
One... It's never gotten smoked. Why? Because a gun and a car are two things that cannot kill people without being operated by humans. If they just sat there without anyone or thing touching them, they can literally not do any harm to anyone or any thing.

Two... The only real difference in this situation vs a drunk driver is the car and the gun.

So lets hear it!
This totally ignores the fact that a car isn't manufactured to kill. In fact great strides are taken to engineer it not to kill. The opposite is true of guns. It also totally ignores the fact cars are far more regulated than guns. Better be careful what you wish for if you want to start treating guns like cars.
 
This totally ignores the fact that a car isn't manufactured to kill. In fact great strides are taken to engineer it not to kill. The opposite is true of guns. It also totally ignores the fact cars are far more regulated than guns. Better be careful what you wish for if you want to start treating guns like cars.

What they were manufactured for has zero bearing on the argument. There are thousands of things that are not manufactured to kill, but they still kill.

This argument that cars weren't manufactured to kill, does not negate the fact that guns and cars in and of themselves cannot kill without human interacting. They literally can't do anything with being operated by a human. Why are you denying this?
 
This totally ignores the fact that a car isn't manufactured to kill. In fact great strides are taken to engineer it not to kill. The opposite is true of guns. It also totally ignores the fact cars are far more regulated than guns. Better be careful what you wish for if you want to start treating guns like cars.
Be great to treat guns like cars then you would not complain about them.
 
What they were manufactured for has zero bearing on the argument. There are thousands of things that are not manufactured to kill, but they still kill.

This argument that cars weren't manufactured to kill, does not negate the fact that guns and cars in and of themselves cannot kill without human interacting. They literally can't do anything with being operated by a human. Why are you denying this?
Because he does not like one and uses the other one.
 
Maybe NEITHER should have guns in public. How is "Protecting your family from home invasion" at all similar to shooting people at will in a movie theatre. There should be NO guns allowed in public. If you're really looking to protect your family and home, keep the gun at HOME.

I know we'll hear "Guns don't kill people" and I'll agree. Idiots that own guns kill people and they are all over this once great country.
What do the following have in common? Speed limits, OWI, rape, stealing, heroin, assault, robbery, oh and guns? There are laws for all of them and there people that break those laws every day.

Do you put your seat belt on during the crash? Do you protect your family by buying a car with airbags?
 
Capitalists don't cash a welfare check. Sorry.

It is interesting how your mind works though. Like most liberals, you ignore common sense.
I don't really consider myself a liberal but at least my mind works. But I guess you don't really know many capitalists if you don't think they cash welfare checks.
 
Dude didn't turn himself in. He called his dad and lied about what happened (according to witnesses) and then his dad notified the police who took him in with no issues. Not like walked into the station saying, "sorry... it was me."
 
  • Like
Reactions: St. Louis Hawk
In most states, it is illegal to handle a firearm while intoxicated.

So, this is not a law-abiding gun owner.


I was wondering about this. Is simply carrying a concealed weapon while intoxicated illegal or do you have to be handling it or doing something with it while intoxicated for it to be illegal? Also, do you know that the enhanced penalty is or if you lose your right to carry or own a firearm if you are convicted of handling a firearm while intoxicated?

Also, as far as the story goes, the term "turned himself in" seems a little loose here. Sounds like he told his dad a different story and his dad turned him in and the cops came and arrested him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: B1GDeal
I was wondering about this. Is simply carrying a concealed weapon while intoxicated illegal or do you have to be handling it or doing something with it while intoxicated for it to be illegal? Also, do you know that the enhanced penalty is or if you lose your right to carry or own a firearm if you are convicted of handling a firearm while intoxicated?

Not an expert, but I believe concealed carry while under the influence is illegal, too. No idea what the penalties are.
 
Chuck Grassley
Terry Branstad
Bruce Rastetter
Most of the farmers in the state of Iowa
Principal Finance
John Deere
DuPont-Pioneer
Need I go on?

I guess I'm not going to received a serious answer to this. Thanks for wasting your time.
 
Dude didn't turn himself in. He called his dad and lied about what happened (according to witnesses) and then his dad notified the police who took him in with no issues. Not like walked into the station saying, "sorry... it was me."

You do know that there's more than one way to turn yourself in, right? You don't have to actually walk in to a police station.

I think the important part about what he told his father was that he shot someone. How it happened doesn't really matter in the grand scheme of things. Whether he was fumbling with the gun or dropped it, it's pretty clear it was an accident.
 
I guess I'm not going to received a serious answer to this. Thanks for wasting your time.
Wow. You asked for one. You were given several. Not our problem you can't grasp the idea of "free marketers" bellying up to the government teat whenever they get the chance.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT