ADVERTISEMENT

Half of the seniors' 48 career losses? All decided by 5 pts or less

Franisdaman

HB King
Nov 3, 2012
101,072
138,073
113
Heaven, Iowa
In the past four seasons, the Hawkeyes are 9-24 in games decided by five points or less (including 2-6 this year). That accounts for half of the seniors' 48 career losses.

Yet the four Iowa seniors' careers should also be remembered for bringing Iowa back to conference and national relevancy. Before these guys arrived, Iowa wasn’t involved in many close calls at all.

Even though Fran McCaffery’s second team was much better than the patchwork first group he inherited from Todd Lickliter, 12 of the 2011-12 Hawkeyes’ 17 losses were by double digits. This year? Zero.

No question, the commitments of Woodbury and Gesell – both top-100 recruits who took a chance on McCaffery’s vision and have since started 263 college games – carried great impact.

Gesell has already set a single-season assists record at Iowa – he needs six to become the first Hawkeye with 200.

Woodbury this year became the first Hawkeye since 2001-02 to average double-digit rebounds (10.0) in conference play.

Clemmons doesn’t boast the stats of the others, but has been a glue guy, defensive stopper and has emerged as the team’s third-leading scorer.

And Uthoff, who transferred in from Wisconsin, has merely become Iowa’s most decorated player since Ronnie Lester, earning multiple second-team all-America honors so far and a unanimous first-team all-Big Ten selection. He also made the Big Ten’s all-defense team after leading the conference in blocked shots.

All told, this senior class has pieced together 88 victories in four years, third-most in Hawkeye history behind the legendary 1989 (97 wins) and 1988 (95) classes. All four years resulted in upper-division Big Ten finishes, and their third Big Dance begins with Friday’s 2:10 p.m. first-round game against Temple at Barclays Arena.

“It’s really hard to do that,” McCaffery said. “That’s what makes us feel so good, to be able to watch these kids. It’s not about us as coaches, it’s about these players and what they’ve been determined to do. And that was come here and build a consistent winner.”

Just think if Iowa had even a .500 record in down-to-the-wire finishes.

This season, that’s been accentuated. In the final 10 seconds of games this year, Iowa has had the ball with a chance to tie or take the lead seven times. Not once have the Hawkeyes converted.

It happened in the Big Ten Tournament loss to Illinois, in which Iowa had the ball down 68-66 with 4 seconds left, but Gesell threw away an inbounds pass from underneath the Illini basket for a painful reminder that this team still has another hump to get over.

CLOSE BUT NOT QUITE

Iowa this season has had the ball seven times (in six games) with a chance to tie or lead in the final 10 seconds, yet has zero conversions. The breakdown:

Opponent, score – Time left, what happened (final score)

Dayton, down 80-77 – :04, Peter Jok missed 3-pointer (Lost, 82-77)

Florida State, tied 63-63 – :02, Mike Gesell turnover (Won in OT, 78-75)

Iowa State, down 83-82 – :00, Jarrod Uthoff missed 3-pointer (Lost, 83-82)

Ohio State, down 66-64 – :03, Gesell layup attempt blocked (Lost, 68-64)

Indiana, down 81-78 – :03, Anthony Clemmons missed 3-pointer

Indiana, down 81-78 – :01, Jok missed 3-pointer after timeout (Lost, 81-78)

Illinois, down 68-66 – :02, Gesell turnover on inbounds pass (Lost, 68-66)

Read the entire article here; http://www.hawkcentral.com/story/sp...ournament-adam-woodbury-mike-gesell/81856400/
 
Last edited:
latest
 
In the past four seasons, the Hawkeyes are 9-24 in games decided by five points or less (including 2-6 this year). That accounts for half of the seniors' 48 career losses.

Yet their careers should also be remembered for bringing Iowa back to conference and national relevancy. Before these guys arrived, Iowa wasn’t involved in many close calls at all.

Read the entire article here; http://www.hawkcentral.com/story/sp...ournament-adam-woodbury-mike-gesell/81856400/

Can probably be said for most teams. Yawn.
 
In the past four seasons, the Hawkeyes are 9-24 in games decided by five points or less (including 2-6 this year). That accounts for half of the seniors' 48 career losses.

Yet the four Iowa seniors' careers should also be remembered for bringing Iowa back to conference and national relevancy. Before these guys arrived, Iowa wasn’t involved in many close calls at all.

Even though Fran McCaffery’s second team was much better than the patchwork first group he inherited from Todd Lickliter, 12 of the 2011-12 Hawkeyes’ 17 losses were by double digits. This year? Zero.

No question, the commitments of Woodbury and Gesell – both top-100 recruits who took a chance on McCaffery’s vision and have since started 263 college games – carried great impact.

Gesell has already set a single-season assists record at Iowa – he needs six to become the first Hawkeye with 200.

Woodbury this year became the first Hawkeye since 2001-02 to average double-digit rebounds (10.0) in conference play.

Clemmons doesn’t boast the stats of the others, but has been a glue guy, defensive stopper and has emerged as the team’s third-leading scorer.

And Uthoff, who transferred in from Wisconsin, has merely become Iowa’s most decorated player since Ronnie Lester, earning multiple second-team all-America honors so far and a unanimous first-team all-Big Ten selection. He also made the Big Ten’s all-defense team after leading the conference in blocked shots.

All told, this senior class has pieced together 88 victories in four years, third-most in Hawkeye history behind the legendary 1989 (97 wins) and 1988 (95) classes. All four years resulted in upper-division Big Ten finishes, and their third Big Dance begins with Friday’s 2:10 p.m. first-round game against Temple at Barclays Arena.

“It’s really hard to do that,” McCaffery said. “That’s what makes us feel so good, to be able to watch these kids. It’s not about us as coaches, it’s about these players and what they’ve been determined to do. And that was come here and build a consistent winner.”

Just think if Iowa had even a .500 record in down-to-the-wire finishes.

This season, that’s been accentuated. In the final 10 seconds of games this year, Iowa has had the ball with a chance to tie or take the lead seven times. Not once have the Hawkeyes converted.

It happened in the Big Ten Tournament loss to Illinois, in which Iowa had the ball down 68-66 with 4 seconds left, but Gesell threw away an inbounds pass from underneath the Illini basket for a painful reminder that this team still has another hump to get over.

CLOSE BUT NOT QUITE

Iowa this season has had the ball seven times (in six games) with a chance to tie or lead in the final 10 seconds, yet has zero conversions. The breakdown:

Opponent, score – Time left, what happened (final score)

Dayton, down 80-77 – :04, Peter Jok missed 3-pointer (Lost, 82-77)

Florida State, tied 63-63 – :02, Mike Gesell turnover (Won in OT, 78-75)

Iowa State, down 83-82 – :00, Jarrod Uthoff missed 3-pointer (Lost, 83-82)

Ohio State, down 66-64 – :03, Gesell layup attempt blocked (Lost, 68-64)

Indiana, down 81-78 – :03, Anthony Clemmons missed 3-pointer

Indiana, down 81-78 – :01, Jok missed 3-pointer after timeout (Lost, 81-78)

Illinois, down 68-66 – :02, Gesell turnover on inbounds pass (Lost, 68-66)

Read the entire article here; http://www.hawkcentral.com/story/sp...ournament-adam-woodbury-mike-gesell/81856400/
 
How many wins less than five points? Maybe it is in the post, but too long to read right now.

says at beginning 9 wins and 24 losses of over last 4 years of Gesell/Woody/Clemmons, and 2-6 this year.

During the losing streak, they were in each of the games and folded at some point in final few minutes. The turn around of Iowa program coincided with emergence of Devyn Marble, White, Olesani, Jok, Uthoff. We will miss senior Uthoff big time...rest of the senior group, meh.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gutt15
YIKES! That is not a good stat.

I hate to say it, but in tight games, Fran has to use his time-outs more wisely and also just burn one to relax the players. I hate to say it, when its on the line, they tense up and their shooting motions look horrible. Just need to relax and knock it down, Routine.

I am hoping they can maybe change their luck and win 2-3 tight games!
 
YIKES! That is not a good stat.

I hate to say it, but in tight games, Fran has to use his time-outs more wisely and also just burn one to relax the players. I hate to say it, when its on the line, they tense up and their shooting motions look horrible. Just need to relax and knock it down, Routine.

I am hoping they can maybe change their luck and win 2-3 tight games!
He did use one vs Indy but Jok missed wide open 3.
 
No loss by more than 8 points this year. Not many teams can say that.

And if a loss by less than 8 points somehow counted for fewer losses than losing by 8 or more, then the Hawks would be the best non-winning but not losing by too much team in the country.

Sounds like something promotions within the athletic department should be all over. Maybe get some t-shirts printed upo_O
 
A lot was made of Michigan having some blowout losses so it does make some difference. Just thought it went well with the main topic of career close loses for the seniors.
 
Think about how these losses effect us. Now consider having to go to class and/or study while trying to get over these losses. Says a lot about our players that they are very good in the classroom after some crushing defeats. Go Hawks!!
 
I would have been more supportive of the argument that close losses can be viewed in a positive light 6 years ago when the program was in shambles.
In the last 2-3 years, though, it looks more like failure to come through in the clutch.
 
simply perception. either you can look at it like they competed at a very high level and they won or were in it to the end of nearly every game they ever played.

Or you can look at it as some horrible failure, as if every major team in the top 50 don't consistently win/lose games year to year by close margins. Completely ignoring the fact that close margins are a huge part of the game of college basketball.

some of you would be happier if they lost all those games by 10+ and that's just plain idiotic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HoustonREDHawk
Nobody can handle the pressure in this group of seniors. That's why Fran NEEDs to be calling timeouts. Although the last time he did Gesell blew it out of bounds.

Remedy: Call a timeout. Keep the ball out of Gesell's hands with less than 12 seconds remaining. Cross fingers
 
Nobody can handle the pressure in this group of seniors. That's why Fran NEEDs to be calling timeouts. Although the last time he did Gesell blew it out of bounds.

Remedy: Call a timeout. Keep the ball out of Gesell's hands with less than 12 seconds remaining. Cross fingers

We might have had better luck if we simply took Gesell out of the game and went 4 on 5.
 
I would have been more supportive of the argument that close losses can be viewed in a positive light 6 years ago when the program was in shambles.
In the last 2-3 years, though, it looks more like failure to come through in the clutch.

those recent year close losses were 20-30 point blowout losses 6 years ago. when you compete at a high level you play in more close games.
 
those recent year close losses were 20-30 point blowout losses 6 years ago. when you compete at a high level you play in more close games.

Yes. 6 years ago. At some point it's no longer reasonable to use the excuse of a wrecked program brought back to respectability and look at how close they come against better competition.
I think it's now past that point.
A close loss now is just a loss.
 
This senior class has taken us from the pits of despair to respectability and then some. They have also been terrible in clutch situations. This season has been representative of their careers.
 
Any casual fan could tell that Iowa was just outclassed by NOVA. I mean they were better than us at every position. But to be fair, Nova is a basketball powerhouse who is constantly in the NCAA's. They are always a top 5 seed in the Dance and they have a rich basketball history in their backyard. Their coach has been there for 10+ years and they constantly get some of the top players in the nation, regardless of where they are from. They are national known basketball school. It showed in the quality of players they have on their roster.

I think Iowa will start to get back to relevancy here in the next couple of years. I mean I realize we are in year 6 of the McCaffery era, but he has made great strides in those 6 years. I think he will continue to grow the program and improve. I think getting Gessell and Woody was a way to get back to being "competitive" in the Big Ten. Now we can take a step forward from that and I think we will all see Fran take us to the next level (Big 10 champ or Sweet 16). Fran will work tirelessly to get the best "available" recruits to Iowa. I think he realizes that our limit was reached with the current senior class. Now its times to take it up a notch.
 
YIKES! That is not a good stat.

I hate to say it, but in tight games, Fran has to use his time-outs more wisely and also just burn one to relax the players. I hate to say it, when its on the line, they tense up and their shooting motions look horrible. Just need to relax and knock it down, Routine.

I am hoping they can maybe change their luck and win 2-3 tight games!

It is not just the strategy. Just look at that Indiana game....tied game and Gesell is guarding Yogi. Gesell has to play off him 3 ft because he can't stay in same zip code and Yogi drains game winning 3 right over top of Gesell. On offense Fran gets great look at basket and Iowa shoots an airball 3. It is the jimmy's and joe's, not the X's and O's.
 
Can probably be said for most teams. Yawn.

Call me crazy but I'm under the impression that it's 50/50, somebody wins and somebody loses when the game is within 5 points. I'm just guessing here but if you estimate the math: there are 337 D1 basketball teams. This analysis probably follows a bell curve. The first quartile is probably around 45% and the third quartile is around 55%. The interquartile range is 10%. So, 0.45 - (1.5*0.1) = 30%. So, the Iowa basketball team would be an outlier.

On the other hand, if the first and third quartiles were 40% and 60% respectively, it would be 15% and Iowa basketball would not be an outlier. However, I don't think those quartiles fall that far out. Since there are 337 D1 teams and this is over many years, I'm guessing they stack very closely to that 50% mark and the 45%-55% is closer to being accurate.
 
Constant debate. We lose too many close games. I agree. We almost never get blown out. I agree. Explanations vary.

To me the bottom line is the 89-48 record over the last four years. That is not something I'm inclined to complain about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ZumaHawk
It is not just the strategy. Just look at that Indiana game....tied game and Gesell is guarding Yogi. Gesell has to play off him 3 ft because he can't stay in same zip code and Yogi drains game winning 3 right over top of Gesell. On offense Fran gets great look at basket and Iowa shoots an airball 3. It is the jimmy's and joe's, not the X's and O's.

This is true to a point, but you can't tell me that UNI was more athletic than Texas? I mean come on they were HUGE/FAST/ATHLETIC beyond UNI's ability. Their coach put them in a position to win and yes I realize it was a lucky shot, but they were at least there under a minute.

I am not disagreeing with you at all, I just think there are some situations where the lesser team wins, and it just happens. I agree that Fran needs to upgrade his Jimmy's and Joes for the next couple of years. I am hoping he can, there are some solid pieces in the underclassmen that could be really good. Just have to get a good PG to be the leader of the offense.
 
Constant debate. We lose too many close games. I agree. We almost never get blown out. I agree. Explanations vary.

To me the bottom line is the 89-48 record over the last four years. That is not something I'm inclined to complain about.

Beings our record the previous 4 years before they came here was down right horrible. 54-75 over 4 years.
 
Someone has to be winning those close games, so most teams can't be 25%

Often it is a handful of teams that win those close games over bunches of other teams.....we just happen to be the leader of bunches of other teams.

See Wisconsin....they win close games.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT