Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Reminds me of 1980s predictions. Edit: Iowa's success with a difficult schedule in 2022 is largely going to depend on the offensive line.3rd highest in B10 behind OSU and UM.
#70 O? That would border on a miraculous improvement from 2021.so are they projecting a top 15 D + #70 O or #1 D + #105 O?
3rd highest in B10 behind OSU and UM.
Not crazy at all when you look at that weak ass schedule.Nebraska +250 is crazy
Brohm and Frost have combined to win more B10 games than Kirk zero times.
F-ing Nebraska. Will it ever end with the preseason bullshit for them.
The Fighting Fitzes will probably beat them in game 1 in Ireland.Not crazy at all when you look at that weak ass schedule.
I’d say Minnesota and Illinois are underrated on this list. Nebraska way overrated.
Free range livestock don't count.Followed by a bump in the births 9 months later.
That was an interesting line in this. Not sure I am sold yet but I am sure hoping there is improvement."...behind a strong offensive line.."
If that statement is accurate, the #11 seems doable. If it's like early last years version, we will have issues.
I'd take a flyer on the Hawks at 5-1.
Only one of those has anything to do with winning the west. I'm thinking they are overrated, but nonetheless their schedule is easy.The Fighting Fitzes will probably beat them in game 1 in Ireland.
any doubt Scotty sits and does an evil laugh clenching his fists daily looking at that Oklahoma game in Lincoln?
Any list that has Nebby in front of Iowa is a joke.
Iowa talking about "easy schedule" is very rich. LMAO always weak ass schedule with lonely ISU and some MAC school. Finally have to play Ohio StYou may joke about Nebby's schedule, but they're not winning a game after Halloween. 0-4 November.
How does that help Nebby?Iowa talking about "easy schedule" is very rich. LMAO always weak ass schedule with lonely ISU and some MAC school. Finally have to play Ohio St
Never stated it helped us..stating that Iowa has had easy scheduling for a long ass time. Iowa won't finish in the top 2 in the West this year so don't matter.How does that help Nebby?
Iowa has earned their respect. Nebby has not done it on the field under Frost. Not done it under any HC for some time, as a matter of fact.
Ha! You wasted your time coming here on our Iowa site to disrespect us?Never stated it helped us..stating that Iowa has had easy scheduling for a long ass time. Iowa won't finish in the top 2 in the West this year so don't matter.
i’m expecting the miracle tbh#70 O? That would border on a miraculous improvement from 2021.
I can certainly think of one team that has consistenly hurt Iowa's strength of schedule.Never stated it helped us..stating that Iowa has had easy scheduling for a long ass time. Iowa won't finish in the top 2 in the West this year so don't matter.
Your non conf. argument is rich. Look at who Nebraska has lost to lately. Colorado team 2x that finished below .500, Troy or NIU all within the last 5 years. Even before that when you played Oregon they had the exact same record as ISU for those 2 seasons. So before OU last year not like Nebraska has been playing teams finishing in the top 25. But that's right you criticize Iowa for playing MAC schools but outside your one P5 game you schedule the power houses of Georgia Southern and North Dakota this year after playing Buffalo and Fordham last year.... Iowa had the cross over game vs PSU compared to Nebby having OSU. During that span you guys went 0-6 looks like Iowa had 1 more win then you guys managed to have. Iowa doesn't make the Big 10 schedule. Your argument is such a lame thing I'd expect from an ISU fan.Iowa talking about "easy schedule" is very rich. LMAO always weak ass schedule with lonely ISU and some MAC school. Finally have to play Ohio St
A 105 Offense would be an 18 spot improvement. I guess we could call that an improvement.#70 O? That would border on a miraculous improvement from 2021.
"...behind a strong offensive line.."
If that statement is accurate, the #11 seems doable. If it's like early last years version, we will have issues.
Answer is B.so are they projecting a top 15 D + #70 O or #1 D + #105 O?