ADVERTISEMENT

High School bans Huck Finn

22*43*51

HB Legend
Nov 23, 2008
16,430
4,299
113
Due to racial slurs. Replaces it with Fredrick Douglas???

A suburban Philadelphia school expelled “Adventures of Huckleberry Finn” from its curriculum over the book’s overuse of the N-word.

The Friends’ Central School removed the Mark Twain classic from the 11th-grade American literature class last week after students said it made them feel uncomfortable,
the Philadelphia Inquirer reported.

“We have all come to the conclusion that the community costs of reading this book in 11th grade outweigh the literary benefits,” principal Art Hall said in a letter to parents.

Hall said students were challenged by the use of the racial slur, and felt the school was not being inclusive enough.

Friends’ Central prides itself on its Quaker roots, according to the school’s website, which emphasize “peaceful resolution of conflicts, seeking truth, and collaboration.”

Deborah Caldwell-Stone, deputy director of the American Library Association’s Office for Intellectual Freedom, blasted the school’s action as an act of censorship.

“We would still see this as a kind of censorship because there is something to be learned from this work,” she told the Inquirer.

But the principal insisted it isn’t censorship.

“I do not believe that we’re censoring. I really do believe that this is an opportunity for the school to step forward and listen to the students,” Hall said.

The book, published in the US in 1885, chronicles the travels of Huck, who runs away from his abusive father, and the friendship he builds with Jim, a runaway slave.

The book will remain in the private school’s library even though it’s no longer on the required reading list. The class will assign “Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass” in place of the Twain work.
 
Due to racial slurs. Replaces it with Fredrick Douglas???

A suburban Philadelphia school expelled “Adventures of Huckleberry Finn” from its curriculum over the book’s overuse of the N-word.

The Friends’ Central School removed the Mark Twain classic from the 11th-grade American literature class last week after students said it made them feel uncomfortable,
the Philadelphia Inquirer reported.

“We have all come to the conclusion that the community costs of reading this book in 11th grade outweigh the literary benefits,” principal Art Hall said in a letter to parents.

Hall said students were challenged by the use of the racial slur, and felt the school was not being inclusive enough.

Friends’ Central prides itself on its Quaker roots, according to the school’s website, which emphasize “peaceful resolution of conflicts, seeking truth, and collaboration.”

Deborah Caldwell-Stone, deputy director of the American Library Association’s Office for Intellectual Freedom, blasted the school’s action as an act of censorship.

“We would still see this as a kind of censorship because there is something to be learned from this work,” she told the Inquirer.

But the principal insisted it isn’t censorship.

“I do not believe that we’re censoring. I really do believe that this is an opportunity for the school to step forward and listen to the students,” Hall said.

The book, published in the US in 1885, chronicles the travels of Huck, who runs away from his abusive father, and the friendship he builds with Jim, a runaway slave.

The book will remain in the private school’s library even though it’s no longer on the required reading list. The class will assign “Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass” in place of the Twain work.
Sounds like censorship to me, but they are a private school so I suppose whatever floats their boat.
 
Sounds like censorship to me, but they are a private school so I suppose whatever floats their boat.

This particular book has been censored many times before.

I just don't get that students and administration are uncomfortable with racial slurs, but approve Douglas.

I guess it's different if Twain writes them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalmwa
Huck Finn has always been one of the most frequently banned books in schools -- going back decades.
 
This particular book has been censored many times before.

I just don't get that students and administration are uncomfortable with racial slurs, but approve Douglas.

I guess it's different if Twain writes them.
It always distresses me when I read these accounts. I'm against virtually all censorship for readings at the high school level; exceptions made for material obviously meant for an adult audience.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BelemNole
This particular book has been censored many times before.

I just don't get that students and administration are uncomfortable with racial slurs, but approve Douglas.

I guess it's different if Twain writes them.
Douglas
This particular book has been censored many times before.

I just don't get that students and administration are uncomfortable with racial slurs, but approve Douglas.

I guess it's different if Twain writes them.
Douglass has racial slurs?
 
So they take it off of their curriculum, so what? They have what, 5 books on their curriculum? It's now off the list with the thousand other classics they don't force the kids to read. As long as they don't ban it from the library or from student's reading it if they want.
 
But has anybody complained that the Douglass book makes them feel uncomfortable?

We can't have uncomfortable students, you know.

Obviously Twain's context is different from Douglass's. And of course there is more differences between Twain and Douglass than just context.

However, if it is an "uncomfortable" word then I would think it would still be "uncomfortable".
 
Obviously Twain's context is different from Douglass's. And of course there is more differences between Twain and Douglass than just context.

However, if it is an "uncomfortable" word then I would think it would still be "uncomfortable".


You know how black people call each other the n-word all day with no offense, but if whitey says it, all hell breaks loose?

Probably the same thing here.
 
Titanhawk2 is correct. While I don't necessarily agree with the school's decision, it does not constitute censorship. Removing a book from the curriculum is not the same as banning the book. It just means it's not required reading anymore.

It would constitute censorship if a teacher saw a student reading the book voluntarily and took it away and/or disciplined him for reading it.
 
Sounds like censorship to me, but they are a private school so I suppose whatever floats their boat.

I guess this. Frederick Douglas is a good story, but banning something like Huck Funn is wrong.

Sure it might not technically be "censorship", they didn't throw out all copies, remove it from the library, have an open burning. But the effect is largely similar, kids won't read the book. I'd hope they'd still let any kid read it and give a report on it.
 
Douglas

Douglass has racial slurs?
Chapeter 6: Note how this forum won't accept the word.
http://www.shmoop.com/life-of-frederick-douglass/education-quotes-2.html

"Learning would spoil the best ****** in the world. Now," said he, "if you teach that ****** (speaking of myself) how to read, there would be no keeping him. It would forever unfit him to be a slave. He would at once become unmanageable, and of no value to his master. As to himself, it could do him no good, but a great deal of harm. It would make him discontented and unhappy." These words sank deep into my heart, stirred up sentiments within that lay slumbering, and called into existence an entirely new train of thought. It was a new and special revelation, explaining dark and mysterious things, with which my youthful understanding had struggled, but struggled in vain. I now understood what had been to me a most perplexing difficulty--to wit, the white man's power to enslave the black man. (6.3)
 
Chapeter 6: Note how this forum won't accept the word.
http://www.shmoop.com/life-of-frederick-douglass/education-quotes-2.html

"Learning would spoil the best ****** in the world. Now," said he, "if you teach that ****** (speaking of myself) how to read, there would be no keeping him. It would forever unfit him to be a slave. He would at once become unmanageable, and of no value to his master. As to himself, it could do him no good, but a great deal of harm. It would make him discontented and unhappy." These words sank deep into my heart, stirred up sentiments within that lay slumbering, and called into existence an entirely new train of thought. It was a new and special revelation, explaining dark and mysterious things, with which my youthful understanding had struggled, but struggled in vain. I now understood what had been to me a most perplexing difficulty--to wit, the white man's power to enslave the black man. (6.3)

That makes me uncomfortable. This has a community cost.
 
Chapeter 6: Note how this forum won't accept the word.
http://www.shmoop.com/life-of-frederick-douglass/education-quotes-2.html

"Learning would spoil the best ****** in the world. Now," said he, "if you teach that ****** (speaking of myself) how to read, there would be no keeping him. It would forever unfit him to be a slave. He would at once become unmanageable, and of no value to his master. As to himself, it could do him no good, but a great deal of harm. It would make him discontented and unhappy." These words sank deep into my heart, stirred up sentiments within that lay slumbering, and called into existence an entirely new train of thought. It was a new and special revelation, explaining dark and mysterious things, with which my youthful understanding had struggled, but struggled in vain. I now understood what had been to me a most perplexing difficulty--to wit, the white man's power to enslave the black man. (6.3)

Obviously there is a big difference in usage between Douglas and Huck Finn. Not that it should matter.
 
Obviously there is a big difference in usage between Douglas and Huck Finn. Not that it should matter.
I'd quibble with that. They are both using it as a derogatory term for a black person. Douglas isn't using it in the salutation sense as it is often used today. He isn't owning the phrase and trying to reshape its meaning. He is using it as it was meant, as a sub-human term. That's how Huck used it too. And in the case of Huck, if memory serves, he then feels right poorly about it and the book goes into great length about why he used it and the ramifications. A part of the book that I recall my 8th grade teacher Mrs Spann spending a great deal of time discussing with the class.

Then later that year we read WWII holocaust literature and compared and contrasted the treatment of Jews to the treatment of slaves. All this in Jr. high in Council Bluffs Iowa. The real shame of this school is that they were just getting to this material in 11th grade.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 22*43*51
I'd quibble with that. They are both using it as a derogatory term for a black person. Douglas isn't using it in the salutation sense as it is often used today. He isn't owning the phrase and trying to reshape its meaning. He is using it as it was meant, as a sub-human term. That's how Huck used it too. And in the case of Huck, if memory serves, he then feels right poorly about it and the book goes into great length about why he used it and the ramifications. A part of the book that I recall my 8th grade teacher Mrs Spann spending a great deal of time discussing with the class.
Pic of Mrs. Spann?
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Tradition
I'd quibble with that. They are both using it as a derogatory term for a black person. Douglas isn't using it in the salutation sense as it is often used today. He isn't owning the phrase and trying to reshape its meaning. He is using it as it was meant, as a sub-human term. That's how Huck used it too. And in the case of Huck, if memory serves, he then feels right poorly about it and the book goes into great length about why he used it and the ramifications. A part of the book that I recall my 8th grade teacher Mrs Spann spending a great deal of time discussing with the class.

Then later that year we read WWII holocaust literature and compared and contrasted the treatment of Jews to the treatment of slaves. All this in Jr. high in Council Bluffs Iowa. The real shame of this school is that they were just getting to this material in 11th grade.

Disagree. Douglas is using it (specifically in the context of what you quoted) to show that the n***** is the one being kept down, as opposed to the one who became educated and is no longer a n*****. He is using their derogatory term to show the difference in how they are kept down.

Huck used it as contextual of the times, including how he felt bad about it, but because it was the "norm" nonetheless. Sure, both of them dealt with the word itself, but one was using it specifically as a negative emphasis, Huck Finn not so much.

Again, not that it should matter.
 
They took it off because students complained it made them "uncomfortable". Who the hell are these patsies? If they feel "uncomfortable" from reading a Twain book then they'll never survive!
 
Exactly. They should be required to read things that make them uncomfortable.
My personal feeling is this would have made a great teaching point. It's actually a good thing that reading the 'n' word makes them feel uncomfortable and why its usage is improper in today's setting, but explain why this was the norm back in the period the book was set.

Heck, reading about the holocaust made me feel uncomfortable (I realize, fiction vs. non-fiction), but reading about the historical context can help remind us what happened and what can be learned from it.
 
Well, that's a provocative method to get every kid in that school to go read Huckleberry Finn.

Schools have been trying to ban that book ever since it was written.
 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalmwa
My personal feeling is this would have made a great teaching point. It's actually a good thing that reading the 'n' word makes them feel uncomfortable and why its usage is improper in today's setting, but explain why this was the norm back in the period the book was set.

Heck, reading about the holocaust made me feel uncomfortable (I realize, fiction vs. non-fiction), but reading about the historical context can help remind us what happened and what can be learned from it.
I think you nailed it here, it's supposed to feel uncomfortable. How do we keep from repeating the past? We never forget the atrocities the human race has committed upon itself.
 
Must say I'm very impressed with you guys...knowing most of your passion for "PC" I would have thought you would be for it...intelligence reins on HROT.
 
Must say I'm very impressed with you guys...knowing most of your passion for "PC" I would have thought you would be for it...intelligence reins on HROT.

Intelligence long, narrow strap attached at one end to a horse's bit, typically used in pairs to guide or check a horse while riding or driving on HROT

?
 
Heck, reading about the holocaust made me feel uncomfortable (I realize, fiction vs. non-fiction), but reading about the historical context can help remind us what happened and what can be learned from it.

Am I the only one who is hoping you think that Huck Finn is the non-fiction?

Oh wait, this isn't OiT nor jakeleg.
 
My personal feeling is this would have made a great teaching point. It's actually a good thing that reading the 'n' word makes them feel uncomfortable and why its usage is improper in today's setting, but explain why this was the norm back in the period the book was set.

Heck, reading about the holocaust made me feel uncomfortable (I realize, fiction vs. non-fiction), but reading about the historical context can help remind us what happened and what can be learned from it.
I agree that this would make a good teaching point. And it's entirely possible that the high school Literature teacher did have such a discussion with the students. The article doesn't specify, so we don't really know.

But it bears repeating that the book was not banned, as the title of this thread erroneously claims. The book was taken off the school's required reading list. But it's still available in the school library. Students are welcome to read it at their leisure. They simply aren't required to read it anymore. And while this incident presented a teachable moment, there are plenty of other ways to impress upon teenagers why it's inappropriate to use the n-word.

This is sort of like when Christians complain that public schools have "banned" prayer or "banned" God. This isn't true either. Students are free to pray voluntarily in public schools. They simply aren't required to. If a student wants to quietly ask for divine guidance before his calculus final he is free to do so. If he wants to offer thanks to the Almighty for his goulash and tater tots at lunchtime, no principal is going to haul him out of the cafeteria by his ear.

Similarly, students at this high school are free to read Huck Finn if they so choose. They can borrow it from their school library. If it's already checked out then they can probably get a copy at a local public library or book store. If all else fails, they can download it to their phone or tablet for next to nothing. I bought the complete works of Mark Twain a few years ago for $1.99 plus tax. It's pretty much everything he ever published - novels, short stories, essays, etc. All for about the price of an order of french fries.

I bet the school would even allow students to form a study group or book club that reads and discusses Huck Finn.
 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalmwa
Seems like a bad idea but censorship of what is considered a great piece of literature typically is a bad idea.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT