ADVERTISEMENT

Hillary wins GOP debate big

PP is just a vendor. No one wants to cut funding for women's health care. A lot of people simply don't like this particular vendor's track record and would prefer that the funding be directed elsewhere.....
 
But to be fair, you don't understand why the govt. should fund anything but an expanded military and tax breaks for the extremely wealthy.

You are probably mistaking me for somebody else. Divorce the politics from the question. I have no problem with women having the right to choose. I don't think the govt should be required to pay for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hawkeye54545
PP is just a vendor. No one wants to cut funding for women's health care. A lot of people simply don't like this particular vendor's track record and would prefer that the funding be directed elsewhere.....

Sure, Christian-based women's health care. That's a non starter too! For too many reasons than you can understand.
 
Sure, Christian-based women's health care. That's a non starter too! For too many reasons than you can understand.

I've not seen anywhere where "christian based women's health care" has been suggested as a prerequisite, nor would I ever suggest that it become one.....
 
But to be fair, you don't understand why the govt. should fund anything but an expanded military and tax breaks for the extremely wealthy.
True, government supports these things. Yet you still support them? That's kind of silly.
 
Sure, Christian-based women's health care. That's a non starter too! For too many reasons than you can understand.
Since when is a woman wanting to have a mistake ripped out of her body somebody else's financial problem?
Oh wait I forgot they are all, rape victims.
 
Since when is a woman wanting to have a mistake ripped out of her body somebody else's financial problem?
Oh wait I forgot they are all, rape victims.

What an idiotically simplistic stance. There are certainly valid and reasonable reasons to be against abortion, to be against PP, and to be against government funding of any of it. This is a dumbass one, fits you well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
What an idiotically simplistic stance. There are certainly valid and reasonable reasons to be against abortion, to be against PP, and to be against government funding of any of it. This is a dumbass one, fits you well.
Does it upset you that the blunt nature of my statement is very true? Let's face it, abortions mostly happen because women had an oops moment. If there are in fact cases, that let's say rape occurred, incest, or a very REAL possibility of fatality to the mother and unborn child, then we have a discussion.

Planned parenthood was brought forth to us through the efforts of a dastardly and devious villainess going by the name, Margaret Sanger.

Take heed children and read the moralistic and humane statements made by her. She is the grandmother of abortion in American.

"The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it."-Margaret Sanger

"Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race"-Margaret Sanger

"We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members."-Margaret Sanger

Excerpts from her Birth Control Review:

Article 1. The purpose of the American Baby Code shall be to provide for a better distribution of babies… and to protect society against the propagation and increase of the unfit.

Article 4. No woman shall have the legal right to bear a child, and no man shall have the right to become a father, without a permit…

Article 6. No permit for parenthood shall be valid for more than one birth.

Woman and the New Race, ch. 6: “The Wickedness of Creating Large Families.” Here, Sanger argues that, because the conditions of large families tend to involve poverty and illness, it is better for everyone involved if a child’s life is snuffed out before he or she has a chance to pose difficulties to its family."-Margaret Sanger



 
http://cns7prod.s3.amazonaws.com/attachments/ministers_letter.pdf

Letter calling for the removal of the KKK and Hitler sympathizer Margaret Sangers statuette.

This excerpt if from the letter linked above. It was written by a group of black pastors:

Perhaps the Gallery is unaware that Ms. Sanger supported black eugenics, a racist attitude toward black and other minority babies; an elitist attitude toward those she regarded as “the feeble minded;” speaking at rallies of Ku Klux Klan women; and communications with Hitler sympathizers. Also, the notorious “Negro Project” which sought to limit, if not eliminate, black births, was her brainchild. Despite these well-documented facts of history, her bust sits proudly in your gallery as a hero of justice. The obvious incongruity is staggering!

Perhaps your institution is a victim of propaganda advanced by those who support abortion. Nevertheless, a prestigious institution like the National Portrait Gallery should have higher standards and subject its honorees to higher scrutiny.

Until now the national spotlight has not fallen on Sanger’s background. However, the recent revelations about aborted babies’ organs and body parts being sold, have not only brought Planned Parenthood under intense scrutiny, but also raised questions about its founder, Margaret Sanger. If the revelations were not consistent with her character and ideas, one might argue that Planned Parenthood has “gone rogue” and abandoned Sanger. The fact is that the behavior of these abortionists, their callous and cavalier attitude toward these babies, is completely in keeping with Sanger’s perverse vision for America.
 
Does it upset you that the blunt nature of my statement is very true? Let's face it, abortions mostly happen because women had an oops moment. If there are in fact cases, that let's say rape occurred, incest, or a very REAL possibility of fatality to the mother and unborn child, then we have a discussion.

Planned parenthood was brought forth to us through the efforts of a dastardly and devious villainess going by the name, Margaret Sanger.

Take heed children and read the moralistic and humane statements made by her. She is the grandmother of abortion in American.

"The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it."-Margaret Sanger

"Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race"-Margaret Sanger

"We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members."-Margaret Sanger

Excerpts from her Birth Control Review:

Article 1. The purpose of the American Baby Code shall be to provide for a better distribution of babies… and to protect society against the propagation and increase of the unfit.

Article 4. No woman shall have the legal right to bear a child, and no man shall have the right to become a father, without a permit…

Article 6. No permit for parenthood shall be valid for more than one birth.

Woman and the New Race, ch. 6: “The Wickedness of Creating Large Families.” Here, Sanger argues that, because the conditions of large families tend to involve poverty and illness, it is better for everyone involved if a child’s life is snuffed out before he or she has a chance to pose difficulties to its family."-Margaret Sanger



As usual, NONE of that nonsense pertains to what you said earlier, nor why I said your statement was idiotic and simplistic. Again, not surprised you can't actually figure it out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
As usual, NONE of that nonsense pertains to what you said earlier, nor why I said your statement was idiotic and simplistic. Again, not surprised you can't actually figure it out.

You see one car during a traffic jam and that is all you see. I see the entire traffic jam and everything else around it. That is the difference between you and me. That's the reason you have never been able to keep up with me.

Basically, your camera is capable of .5 megapixel pictures. I'm a +100 Megapixel camera wielder. It's just easier for me to decipher information, due to my greater ability to capture it.
 
As usual, NONE of that nonsense pertains to what you said earlier, nor why I said your statement was idiotic and simplistic. Again, not surprised you can't actually figure it out.
No comment on Margaret Sangers, very obvious and open opinions on why abortion was important? No comment on her blatantly racist and tyrannical statements, which lacked empathy and most of all any humanity whatsoever? It's clear she was a sociopath, that saw life in numbers, rather than what life actually is.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT