Are you a WW2 buff?
Interesting stuff. I know very little about the weaponry.
I love history & the most interesting point for me is the Prussian-German Army 1657-1945
Are you a WW2 buff?
Interesting stuff. I know very little about the weaponry.
my bad.noticed your edit. The Germans did not rearm the Mark IV's with the long barreled 75 mm until 1942 as result of encountering heaver Soviet tanks {mainly the T-34s & KV series} in such large numbers in 1941. Lessons learned.
Well the Brits brought a whole bunch of German Hessian mercenaries over the fight the colonial army but they got taken care of, not sure which battle that was, I would expect that even if French regular forces did not come into the fight, that a lot of French men might have come over on their own 1) to get out of France because their King was a madman and 2) for the excitement and chance to make a new life, get money, adventureI don’t remember if he did. I seem to recall that he did, but I’d have to check.
I've never heard the claim that the "French were the global leader in artillery, and had a marked advantage over Germany in this regard."
Some British & French tanks had thicker armor & more powerful main guns. But overall German variants of the Mark III & Mark IV are pretty underrated. But more importantly Germans had superior combined arms doctrine & had air superiority for most of the campaign.
I guess I'm not sure what you're saying? The French Army in 1940 was bad?
my bad.
@FSUTribe76 .Knows a lot of things.
“The engine of the tank is a weapon just as the main-gun." ~ Heinz Guderian
The German Army (at least a significant enough portion of it) had made a doctrinal leap that the Allies hadn’t yet.
German commanders kept beating their counterparts in the OODA loop.
Mais, pourquoi les gens dirait que je suis une femme Tribe.Merci, ça me fait plaisir.
Thanks.you were probably thinking of the Mark III series. The Germans made significant efforts to up-gun the Mark IIIs from 37 mm to 50 mm between the end of the French campaign & the beginning of the invasion of the Soviet Union. While there were 50 mm versions during the French campaign {the Gs} the overall ratio significantly increased away from the 37 mm {mainly Fs} to the 50 mm version {mainly Gs & Hs}. After the French campaign the Germans concluded the 37 mm were no longer viable against modern armor. Just as after the invasion of the Soviet Union the Germans beloved longer barreled 75 mm were required. However many 37 mm & shorter 75 mm remained in service due to necessity.
don't even get me started on the saga of the higher velocity 50 mm Mark III J LoL
Good point.If not for France, we’d still be singing God Save The Queen.
How do you think us boomers feel?🤣I've gotten more dumb as the years past. Dead serious, I blame technology. Plus, it is a message board. I exude random thoughts on here.
Did I get that grammatically correct?![]()
Sorry, Jimmy. *have gone*. It’s just something that drives me nuts.
Definitely. The other cool thing about LaFayette is that he gave ideas for our capital.We would not have won the Revolutionary War without the French assistance.
Napoleon was the best military commander of all time, IMO.
His win-loss record was something like 56-4 and he only really lost twice invading Russia and at Waterloo.
CSB.
Alexander the Great was undefeated--he never lost a single battle. And he personally fought aside his soldiers in every battle.
Of all historical figures with "the Great" after their names, Alexander was the greatest.
Alexander is my #2.
He died pretty young...32 years old.
He was undefeated in battle but didn't lead troops in 60 battles like Napoleon did.
I think Alexander fought and won at least 20 battles.
Of course, this is like comparing Wilt Chamberlain to Kobe Bryant. You can't compare eras.
Alexander was definitely great but I give the edge to Napoleon based on win-loss record.
No one has a win-loss record like Napoleon.
70-10 according to Wikipedia and he only lost at the end mostly.
Alexander was definitely great but I give the edge to Napoleon based on win-loss record.
No one has a win-loss record like Napoleon.
70-10 according to Wikipedia and he only lost at the end mostly.
Alexander was definitely great but I give the edge to Napoleon based on win-loss record.
No one has a win-loss record like Napoleon.
70-10 according to Wikipedia and he only lost at the end mostly.
I don't think W-L should be the main criteria
Actually a good point. Napolean's losses speak more than his wins. He was smart person, but an utter idiot in some things
I don't think W-L should be the main criteria
It's should be one criteria, IMO.
W-L records can be very distorted but still should of course be considered
That is my Dad’s crew. They hit Maryland shores approx. 1609.Also French Huguenots were not Norman. They’re truly a mix, many from the south of France and more Roman/Italian, not Norse
My Mom’s ancestry is part of that group too. They wound up in eastern North Carolina.That is my Dad’s crew. They hit Maryland shores approx. 1609.
So did some of mine. Are you related to the Calvert? Porter, Howson, many others bThat is my Dad’s crew. They hit Maryland shores approx. 1609.
We mostly moved South… NC and big into Georgia, Alabama, and eventually Mississippi, Florida, and Texas.So did some of mine. Are you related to the Calvert? Porter, Howson, many others b
Well, I could go on for hours about genealogy. Mine crossed the river, then went from Virginia to Tennessee, Smith county.We mostly moved South… NC and big into Georgia, Alabama, and eventually Mississippi, Florida, and Texas.
One guy was an ambassador to France, another a President of Texas. Lots of educators, Physicians and Pharmacists, amongst plenty of ne’er de wells and scalliwogs.,
My ole man was a big genealogy guy who spent many hours, with us, walking cemeteries and quizzing folks in courthouses.Well, I could go on for hours about genealogy. Mine crossed the river, then went from Virginia to Tennessee, Smith county.
They stayed in VA until about 1830, before going through the gap. Another family name was Settle of that particular branch.
While I was living in NY, I figured I’d focus on VA research because cousins lived in VA and MD. I knew I’d get back here, and then I could work on the VA to AL, and SC to GA parts of the family.
Much to talk about. Another time because I also have that Scots Irish thing on both sides, going up the valley from PA to NC and VA.My ole man was a big genealogy guy who spent many hours, with us, walking cemeteries and quizzing folks in courthouses.
He was proud of our folks, while not so happy knowing that some were slavers and killers of the first people.
Same was mostly true on my mom’s side. Scot-Irish who produced several US presidents and again mostly moved South along the great road from Pennsylvania.m
Many educators, and business folks, along with native killers. I once visited a home in which we aided the Underground Railroad Northbound.
What goes around… I have cousins and siblings who have been/are active military folks and they are near equally split politically today.
One niece who has recently been named to lead a ballistic missile command….