I can’t find it in the rule book that describes the call from last night, can anyone point this out?
Also,I can’t find it in the rule book that describes the call from last night, can anyone point this out?
Apparently if drag him forward it is not a penalty which is horseshitI can’t find it in the rule book that describes the call from last night, can anyone point this out?
I think it was the correct call, but it definitely needs to get changed.Apparently if drag him forward it is not a penalty which is horseshit
interesting. but the runner still was affected by the grab around the neck.Horse Collar Tackle—ARTICLE 15
Approved Ruling 9-1-15
I. As ball carrier A20 races down field near the sideline, defender B56 grabs him from behind by the back of the jersey at the collar or by the collar of his shoulder pad. B56 continues with this contact for several yards but A20 does not go to the ground until tackled by another defender. RULING: Legal play. B56 did not foul because he did not immediately pull A20 down.
Agreeinteresting. but the runner still was affected by the grab around the neck.
maybe they need to tweak the rule because the goal should be player safety and I don't think grabbing behind the player's neck is exactly safe (whip lash or not).
Thoughts?
i think the original intent of the horse collar was to prevent neck, back, and leg injuries that might result when violently, suddenly being pulled backwards.Kind of an odd rule.
I guess my only problem is it introduces even more subjectivity into officiating. Sargeant wasn't yanked down but was slowed down quite abruptly. A little stronger yank and the correct call would be quite debatable it seems.
That should already be the rule. How many kids have been punished that had no intention of "targeting", or malice of any kind? The answer is plenty because it's a fast game and shit happens that you have no control over. Wrong place at wrong time. You thought they were going to zig and instead they zagged and your job is to get them to the ground with the least amount of yardage allowed.i think the original intent of the horse collar was to prevent neck, back, and leg injuries that might result when violently, suddenly being pulled backwards.
I would like to see the horse collar evolve into what the face mask rule has become. Grab it, no matter the direction you force the player? 15 yd penalty.
Yeah, I didn't mean the rule or concept itself was odd, just that there exists some leeway.i think the original intent of the horse collar was to prevent neck, back, and leg injuries that might result when violently, suddenly being pulled backwards.
I would like to see the horse collar evolve into what the face mask rule has become. Grab it, no matter the direction you force the player? 15 yd penalty.
I’ve seen it called on every solo tackle when the fingers went inside the pad. Front back and side. I’ve seen it missed but never applied in the manner described in this game.It’s to prevent the sudden pulling of the runner backwards, protecting their knees and ankles. I’ve never seen it called besides the sudden pulling them backwards.
This. The rule was put into place because of several severe leg breaks to players who were abrubtly pulled backwards away from their momentum, causing extra stress on bones and joints. Anyone who has seen some of these incidents during a game can understand the difference from what happened to Sarge on Saturday. That was one of the few calls I had no problem with.It’s to prevent the sudden pulling of the runner backwards, protecting their knees and ankles. I’ve never seen it called besides the sudden pulling them backwards.