ADVERTISEMENT

How do you feel about the President defying a court order?

How do you feel about the President defying a court order?

  • I think a President's authority is higher than the courts and it is in their power to defy an order

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    34

gohawks50

HB Legend
Gold Member
Dec 28, 2010
14,421
31,159
113
So far Trump has not defied a court order, but Musk and Vance are suggesting he could/should.
 
He should be impeached immediately and any Congressperson who votes against impeachment should also be impeached because they are most definitely NOT "defending the Constitution".

Note for the idiots: "Should" does not mean "will". We all know what will actually happen.
 
And for those of you trying to use a "But Biden!", here is how he did not actually defy a court order.


And it should be mentioned that no one actually got their student loans forgiven so, there's that.
 
He should be impeached immediately and any Congressperson who votes against impeachment should also be impeached because they are most definitely NOT "defending the Constitution".

Note for the idiots: "Should" does not mean "will". We all know what will actually happen.
For what? Upsetting you?
 
And for those of you trying to use a "But Biden!", here is how he did not actually defy a court order.


And it should be mentioned that no one actually got their student loans forgiven so, there's that.
OK......

"...The White House has said that the plan would cut many borrowers' monthly payments to zero, saving others around $1,000 per year, estimating that over 20 million Americans could benefit."

"The program has faced two separate legal challenges in Republican-led states, which argue that the president overstepped his authority in implementing his debt relief plans by not acquiring input from Congress.

Last week, federal judges in Kansas and Missouri halted parts of the SAVE plan. In Kansas, U.S. District Judge Daniel Crabtree, ruled in a lawsuit filed by the state attorney general that the Department of Education could not implement parts of the program designed to assist students with larger loans by lowering their monthly payments and reducing their repayment period from 25 years to 20 years.

He permitted parts of the program that allow students who borrowed less than $12,000 to have their remaining loans forgiven after making repayments for 10 years instead of the usual 25 years.

U.S. District Judge John Ross of Missouri ruled that the DoE could not forgive loan balances going forward, but said the federal department could lower monthly payments. He said the DoE "lacks the requisite congressional authority to forgive loans under the SAVE plan."

Sounds like they used a loophole to forgive loans.
 
OK......

"...The White House has said that the plan would cut many borrowers' monthly payments to zero, saving others around $1,000 per year, estimating that over 20 million Americans could benefit."

"The program has faced two separate legal challenges in Republican-led states, which argue that the president overstepped his authority in implementing his debt relief plans by not acquiring input from Congress.

Last week, federal judges in Kansas and Missouri halted parts of the SAVE plan. In Kansas, U.S. District Judge Daniel Crabtree, ruled in a lawsuit filed by the state attorney general that the Department of Education could not implement parts of the program designed to assist students with larger loans by lowering their monthly payments and reducing their repayment period from 25 years to 20 years.

He permitted parts of the program that allow students who borrowed less than $12,000 to have their remaining loans forgiven after making repayments for 10 years instead of the usual 25 years.

U.S. District Judge John Ross of Missouri ruled that the DoE could not forgive loan balances going forward, but said the federal department could lower monthly payments. He said the DoE "lacks the requisite congressional authority to forgive loans under the SAVE plan."

Sounds like they used a loophole to forgive loans.
If it's a loophole, it was not defying an court order.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HawkMD
OK......

"...The White House has said that the plan would cut many borrowers' monthly payments to zero, saving others around $1,000 per year, estimating that over 20 million Americans could benefit."

"The program has faced two separate legal challenges in Republican-led states, which argue that the president overstepped his authority in implementing his debt relief plans by not acquiring input from Congress.

Last week, federal judges in Kansas and Missouri halted parts of the SAVE plan. In Kansas, U.S. District Judge Daniel Crabtree, ruled in a lawsuit filed by the state attorney general that the Department of Education could not implement parts of the program designed to assist students with larger loans by lowering their monthly payments and reducing their repayment period from 25 years to 20 years.

He permitted parts of the program that allow students who borrowed less than $12,000 to have their remaining loans forgiven after making repayments for 10 years instead of the usual 25 years.

U.S. District Judge John Ross of Missouri ruled that the DoE could not forgive loan balances going forward, but said the federal department could lower monthly payments. He said the DoE "lacks the requisite congressional authority to forgive loans under the SAVE plan."

Sounds like they used a loophole to forgive loans.
So, didn't defy? They worked along what was allowable after the bulk of the plan was not allowed, is that what you are tying to say?
 
Hmmmmm, the USSC said it was unconstitutional for Biden to cancel student debt without the consent of congress. He did it anyway. Is that simple enough for you?
Hmmm… they ruled his plan to cancel the debt unconstitutional. He then rolled out a quite different plan that did not cancel/forgive debt.

Is that simple enough for you?
 
If it's a loophole, it was not defying an court order.
even saying it's a loophole is a little disingenuous.

a court order was issued regarding that attempt to forgive student loan debt. some things were allowed, some things weren't. the things allowed by the court order were implemented.

not only is that NOT defying a court order...it's explicitly FOLLOWING a court order
 
OK......

"...The White House has said that the plan would cut many borrowers' monthly payments to zero, saving others around $1,000 per year, estimating that over 20 million Americans could benefit."

"The program has faced two separate legal challenges in Republican-led states, which argue that the president overstepped his authority in implementing his debt relief plans by not acquiring input from Congress.

Last week, federal judges in Kansas and Missouri halted parts of the SAVE plan. In Kansas, U.S. District Judge Daniel Crabtree, ruled in a lawsuit filed by the state attorney general that the Department of Education could not implement parts of the program designed to assist students with larger loans by lowering their monthly payments and reducing their repayment period from 25 years to 20 years.

He permitted parts of the program that allow students who borrowed less than $12,000 to have their remaining loans forgiven after making repayments for 10 years instead of the usual 25 years.

U.S. District Judge John Ross of Missouri ruled that the DoE could not forgive loan balances going forward, but said the federal department could lower monthly payments. He said the DoE "lacks the requisite congressional authority to forgive loans under the SAVE plan."

Sounds like they used a loophole to forgive loans.
Gee, they found a loophole. NOW that's a problem? Republicans better watch out then.

But, he did not defy a court order which is what this thread is about and many people are insisting he did.
 
Really? Show me where the court DID NOT say it was unconstitutional.

You were the one that made the claim.

Biden didn’t violate a Court Order. If he did, it would be really easy for you to find because the right wing echo chamber would be all over it. You can’t find it because it doesn’t exist.

Courts said Biden couldn’t do what he was doing. One under the Save Act and one under the Heroes Act. He didn’t violate any Court Orders in either case.
 
Biden set precedent for this and was actually being sued by multiple state AGs on student loans which is why he was blocked. In this case you have a rogue activist judge claiming the secretary of the treasury has no right to accessing the treasury arbitrarily. The judge should be removed and probably imprisoned for attempting a sort of coup. Blatantly unconstitutional behavior once again from the far left.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: cigaretteman
Run Away Nuclear Bomb GIF by Identity
 
Biden set precedent for this and was actually being sued by multiple state AGs on student loans which is why he was blocked. In this case you have a rogue activist judge claiming the secretary of the treasury has no right to accessing the treasury arbitrarily. The judge should be removed and probably imprisoned for attempting a sort of coup. Blatantly unconstitutional behavior once again from the far left.
I can't imagine going thru life so objectively stupid.

Thoughts and Prayers dude, thoughts and prayers
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT