How much more evidence do y’all need that Trump is working for Putin?
- Thread starter Tom Paris
- Start date
"stand down from all planning against Russia, including offensive digital actions.” The outlet cites three anonymous sources who are familiar with the matter. The order reportedly does not apply to the National Security Agency"
Holy overreaction Batman. We don't even really have details on this yet.
You guys crack me up continually.
Holy overreaction Batman. We don't even really have details on this yet.
You guys crack me up continually.
Putin is thanking our government now for aligning with them. Awesome.
Sure, sure, sure. Nothing to see here. Same bullshit. If Biden had done this you would be blowing a gasket. Republicans can never claim to be strong on defense ever again.
Nope, I wait until all available facts are known before reacting and certainly before making decisions. Emotion and overreaction are the enemy of profit and running a successful business in challenging times such as we have now faced for several years.
hawkeyetraveler
HB Heisman
At some level it honestly doesn’t matter whether Trump an agent or not. There is not a single thing I have seen from him this term that would be any different if he is an agent.
Whether deliberate, or just due to his perverted world view he is making Russia Great Again.
Whether deliberate, or just due to his perverted world view he is making Russia Great Again.
It’s deliberate. Every single thing he’s doing is making Putin happy. Comrade Tulsi is blaming Zelensky for “escalating”. I hate what they have done to America. They are destroying The Great Experiment.
None of my response was emotional. It's based on facts and actions. It's emotion that is keeping you from seeing the truth right now.
I'm not sure I posted your response was emotional? In fact, I didn't post this, so the first part of your response is not germane.
Your response is based on facts and actions? What specific facts and actions are you basing your response on given the overall lack of verified information on this specific topic, and in the cited news article?
Leave that aside, the third part of your response is inaccurate. I'm letting my emotions prevent me from seeing the truth? The truth in a news article that cites anonymous sources, seems to hint that this only applies to offensive planning (not defense), doesn't apply to the NSA and has no real information?
We're going to agree to disagree here. There isn't nearly enough information to even begin to form an opinion.
If what this argument says is correct given what we have seen in the last week, it’s a problem. I have constantly made fun of lefties in this board for the mental gymnastics required to hold their views. What you are doing here is an excellent example of that.
Myself waiting for more facts prior to formulating an opinion is an example of what lefties do on this board? Quite the opposite, but you do you.
And what about Zelenskyy? Who is he? Is he an organic leader who came from nowhere or was he installed?
Covert Action reported that, in 2020, Zelenskyy secretly met with MI6 head Richard Moore. Why would a foreign president meet with the UK’s top spy instead of its PM?
Is Zelenskyy a UK asset? According to reports, he is personally protected by British, not Ukrainian security. When he visited the Vatican, he snubbed the Pope and met with a British bishop. Guess who else was there? Richard Moore from MI6 again! That's some coincidence.
Before politics, Zelenskyy was a comedian and actor—literally playing the president on a TV show. Then, with the help of Western PR teams, fiction became reality.
His campaign was funded by oligarch Ihor Kolomoisky, who owned Ukraine’s largest oil company and bank.
Once in power, Zelenskyy’s priority wasn’t fighting corruption—it was making sure BlackRock & Western banks took over Ukraine’s economy.
Meanwhile, he funneled millions into offshore accounts and acquired a $34m mansion in Miami as well as a £multi London apartment.
Covert Action reported that, in 2020, Zelenskyy secretly met with MI6 head Richard Moore. Why would a foreign president meet with the UK’s top spy instead of its PM?
Is Zelenskyy a UK asset? According to reports, he is personally protected by British, not Ukrainian security. When he visited the Vatican, he snubbed the Pope and met with a British bishop. Guess who else was there? Richard Moore from MI6 again! That's some coincidence.
Before politics, Zelenskyy was a comedian and actor—literally playing the president on a TV show. Then, with the help of Western PR teams, fiction became reality.
His campaign was funded by oligarch Ihor Kolomoisky, who owned Ukraine’s largest oil company and bank.
Once in power, Zelenskyy’s priority wasn’t fighting corruption—it was making sure BlackRock & Western banks took over Ukraine’s economy.
Meanwhile, he funneled millions into offshore accounts and acquired a $34m mansion in Miami as well as a £multi London apartment.
Democrats react and make all of their decisions on emotions, that's why they're soft.
Sounds a lot like what Trump says about Putin. But of course Trump carries water for Putin, not Clinton.
White boomer males are the softest motherfvckers currently walking the planet. AIAEC.
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
I de-committed, and nobody wanted to be my friend. (Kadyn Proctor)- Latest: LeftyNovotny
-