Over the last 100 years, the income gap has increased. True or False? Sound off, my HROT brethren!
I don't know about the Income gap, even though I was once an economist for...........
But, I am certain the America's standards, both educational and societal have been
DUMBED-down over say, the past 7 years.
It is not his color.....it's his Communism!It's that dang ole colored president huh Jim Bob.
It is not his color.....it's his Communism!
The answer is yes actually. Doesn't matter how it got to the point it is at, it's higher than ever at this time.If you insist on using a century of data, the answer appears to be no. I might suggest that's a meaningless negative however.
![]()
![]()
Tell us what communism is.You don't know what communism is so it must be his color.
We disagree How it got to that point seems to be a rather monumental concern. And pushing the timeline back doesn't help make your analysis appear more sound or less in need of support.The answer is yes actually. Doesn't matter how it got to the point it is at, it's higher than ever at this time.
It's that dang ole colored president huh Jim Bob.
Wealth gap, all time high, now. Prime wins again, just as be always does.We disagree How it got to that point seems to be a rather monumental concern. And pushing the timeline back doesn't help make your analysis appear more sound or less in need of support.
We have a red team running the economy. Who do you think sets tax and trade and spending policy. Link to the historic achievement?Wealth gap, all time high, now. Prime wins again, just as be always does.
You likely wouldn't have such a hard time with this fact, if there was a Red Teamer in the Oval Office.
Playing the race card, how dull.It's that dang ole colored president huh Jim Bob.
Look who stood directly behind the Fed in support as they used QE to increase the wealth gap. Did he not sign in the Stimulus as well? Didn't he sell companies to Italy and China for us as well? Isn't the ACA directly affecting the economy negatively as well?We have a red team running the economy. Who do you think sets tax and trade and spending policy. Link to the historic achievement?
Apparently you've already given up on proving anything. Seems to be a common theme for folks on your team.Look who stood directly behind the Fed in support as they used QE to increase the wealth gap. Did he not sign in the Stimulus as well? Didn't he sell companies to Italy and China for us as well? Isn't the ACA directly affecting the economy negatively as well?
You can never beat me.
Tell us what communism is.
Apparently you've already given up on proving anything. Seems to be a common theme for folks on your team.
More deflecting. If this is all you got you should run along home boy.You realized I always addressed this, right?
LOL! You sound like a broken record. I used to think of you as someone above average in intelligence, that just likes to be a troll. Now I just realize that you're an idiot who trolls as a last defense.
More deflecting. If this is all you got you should run along home boy.
Your optimism is charming, like the boy who fancies himself Superman. Go get 'em tiger!What am I deflecting? I don't even know what you're discussing. I just see trends.
It's why I'm going to be brilliant in the financial industry.
Your optimism is charming, like the boy who fancies himself Superman. Go get 'em tiger!
It's cute the way you pull on my pant leg. You're a good boy you are. Now do a trick.My optimism aside, I like being here because it increases my bulls*** detector, plus it allows me to learn how to manipulate people. Both are paramount to being successful. I figured you out a long time ago. You aren't very difficult. Maybe it's my years of dealing with forty people every day, six, and sometimes seven, days a week. You obviously learn a lot about human nature by engaging humans.
It's cute the way you pull on my pant leg. You're a good boy you are. Now do a trick.
Good boy, stick with me and I'll keep schooling you.I'm not the one doing tricks. I'm the one learning.![]()
Good boy, stick with me and I'll keep schooling you.
We disagree How it got to that point seems to be a rather monumental concern. And pushing the timeline back doesn't help make your analysis appear more sound or less in need of support.
I've read this entire thread twice and I can't for the life of me figure out what you guys are arguing about. Could somebody clear this up?
You're making your already weak self seem weaker. I despise such weakness. Have you not spine my dear friend? You can't even type straight in my presence.Piss off you clown. Why would bother. I cringe when I see you quote me.
This is proven already, you know this do you not?Apparently you've already given up on proving anything. Seems to be a common theme for folks on your team.
I think we're just having a pissing contest. We all think the income gap is growing. Some think FDR is to blame, others think Obama. I appreciate that they feel it's blame worthy while on a mission to get them to show their work and entertaining myself.I've read this entire thread twice and I can't for the life of me figure out what you guys are arguing about. Could somebody clear this up?
I think we're just having a pissing contest. We all think the income gap is growing. Some think FDR is to blame, others think Obama. I appreciate that they feel it's blame worthy while on a mission to get them to show their work and entertaining myself.
You're the guy dancing to my tune.LOL! Do you truly have no other retort? I kind of feel bad for you.
I will when you link the evidence.This is proven already, you know this do you not?
Link evidence against my claim first.I will when you link the evidence.
If by crazy you mean providing a researched direct answer. The world should be so crazy.There's really no arguing. I ask Natural a question and he goes all crazy on me. It isn't like I make the questions difficult. They are, a lot of time, yes or no questions.
Scroll up. Your turn.Link evidence against my claim first.
Wealth gap, all time high, now. Prime wins again, just as be always does.
You likely wouldn't have such a hard time with this fact, if there was a Red Teamer in the Oval Office.
You're missing the water sports.Ok...maybe I'm totally off the mark...but doesn't natural AGREE that the wealth gap is higher now? WTH am I missing here?
If by crazy you mean providing a researched direct answer. The world should be so crazy.