ADVERTISEMENT

Hundreds of FAA employees are let go as Trump's mass layoffs continue

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
79,580
62,926
113
This seems wise!:

The Trump administration fired hundreds of employees with the Federal Aviation Administration over the weekend, just weeks after a fatal crash in Washington, D.C., exposed understaffing at the agency.

The union representing the employees called the firings a “hastily made decision” that would increase the workload of a workforce already stretched thin. The union statement referred to the D.C. crash as well as two others in recent weeks across the country as evidence that it was not the time to cut back personnel at the agency.



“This decision did not consider the staffing needs of the FAA, which is already challenged by understaffing," David Spero, the national president of the Professional Aviation Safety Specialists, AFL-CIO, said in a statement. “Staffing decisions should be based on an individual agency’s mission-critical needs. To do otherwise is dangerous when it comes to public safety. And it is especially unconscionable in the aftermath of three deadly aircraft accidents in the past month.”

A union spokesperson said close to 300 of its members received termination notices over the weekend, and those affected worked as maintenance mechanics, aeronautical information specialists, environmental protection specialists, aviation safety assistants as well as management and program assistants.

 
This seems wise!:

The Trump administration fired hundreds of employees with the Federal Aviation Administration over the weekend, just weeks after a fatal crash in Washington, D.C., exposed understaffing at the agency.

The union representing the employees called the firings a “hastily made decision” that would increase the workload of a workforce already stretched thin. The union statement referred to the D.C. crash as well as two others in recent weeks across the country as evidence that it was not the time to cut back personnel at the agency.



“This decision did not consider the staffing needs of the FAA, which is already challenged by understaffing," David Spero, the national president of the Professional Aviation Safety Specialists, AFL-CIO, said in a statement. “Staffing decisions should be based on an individual agency’s mission-critical needs. To do otherwise is dangerous when it comes to public safety. And it is especially unconscionable in the aftermath of three deadly aircraft accidents in the past month.”

A union spokesperson said close to 300 of its members received termination notices over the weekend, and those affected worked as maintenance mechanics, aeronautical information specialists, environmental protection specialists, aviation safety assistants as well as management and program assistants.


Don’t panic. It works out to an average of 4-5 per state.
 
Last edited:
This seems wise!:

The Trump administration fired hundreds of employees with the Federal Aviation Administration over the weekend, just weeks after a fatal crash in Washington, D.C., exposed understaffing at the agency.

The union representing the employees called the firings a “hastily made decision” that would increase the workload of a workforce already stretched thin. The union statement referred to the D.C. crash as well as two others in recent weeks across the country as evidence that it was not the time to cut back personnel at the agency.



“This decision did not consider the staffing needs of the FAA, which is already challenged by understaffing," David Spero, the national president of the Professional Aviation Safety Specialists, AFL-CIO, said in a statement. “Staffing decisions should be based on an individual agency’s mission-critical needs. To do otherwise is dangerous when it comes to public safety. And it is especially unconscionable in the aftermath of three deadly aircraft accidents in the past month.”

A union spokesperson said close to 300 of its members received termination notices over the weekend, and those affected worked as maintenance mechanics, aeronautical information specialists, environmental protection specialists, aviation safety assistants as well as management and program assistants.

LOL - You do realize not everyone who works for the FAA is a Air Traffic Controller? You realize that don't you?
 
Yes, the left wing position is to let planes crash until carbon emissions are minimized. If planes keep crashing, eventually people will buy bicycles, hybrids, and EVs.

Nicolas Cage Bullshit GIF
 
Ok...so what's some hard information for the thread? Hmm. The FAA currently employs approximately 45,000 people. Roughly 300 FAA workers, many of whom were probationary employees, were laid off. Oh, but the crashes! What's going on in commercial aviation?? Well, what's going on is approximately 2.9 million people fly commercially every single day resulting in 350 deaths per-year. Or, I guess I should have said over a billion people fly commercially annually. And 350 die as a result. Thanks.
 
Ok...so what's some hard information for the thread? Hmm. The FAA currently employs approximately 45,000 people. Roughly 300 FAA workers, many of whom were probationary employees, were laid off. Oh, but the crashes! What's going on in commercial aviation?? Well, what's going on is approximately 2.9 million people fly commercially every single day resulting in 350 deaths per-year. Or, I guess I should have said over a billion people fly commercially annually. And 350 die as a result. Thanks.
We were already in a shortage . . . we having already had some accidents recently, including where even though the staffing time levels dictated a single operator, had another person been there, could have kept better eyes and tried to have averted the crash. Airflight is supposed to be safer, do we really want to decrease the safety in the air?

Where do republicans even come from to think that this is a good idea. Other than trying to defend their supreme Overlord, this is just beyond stupid.
 
We were already in a shortage . . . we having already had some accidents recently, including where even though the staffing time levels dictated a single operator, had another person been there, could have kept better eyes and tried to have averted the crash. Airflight is supposed to be safer, do we really want to decrease the safety in the air?

Where do republicans even come from to think that this is a good idea. Other than trying to defend their supreme Overlord, this is just beyond stupid.

Wow. Well, I tried.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BelemNole
Ok...so what's some hard information for the thread? Hmm. The FAA currently employs approximately 45,000 people. Roughly 300 FAA workers, many of whom were probationary employees, were laid off. Oh, but the crashes! What's going on in commercial aviation?? Well, what's going on is approximately 2.9 million people fly commercially every single day resulting in 350 deaths per-year. Or, I guess I should have said over a billion people fly commercially annually. And 350 die as a result. Thanks.
This shouldn't be happening. Period is the correct answer
 
Ok...so what's some hard information for the thread? Hmm. The FAA currently employs approximately 45,000 people. Roughly 300 FAA workers, many of whom were probationary employees, were laid off. Oh, but the crashes! What's going on in commercial aviation?? Well, what's going on is approximately 2.9 million people fly commercially every single day resulting in 350 deaths per-year. Or, I guess I should have said over a billion people fly commercially annually. And 350 die as a result. Thanks.

I liked it better when you tried to fight @Here_4_a_Day

Much less of a stick in the mud
 
  • Sad
Reactions: CallingADeerAHorse
Let me try and understand this from the POV of the thread's liberal posters...keeping the 300 employees that were laid off would have helped to reverse the rash of deaths currently going on in commercial aviation. Is that a fair statement?

In the grand scheme of things probably not. But this is just another dumb thing that Trump does. How about the NNSA firings? Whoops, wasn't supposed to do that! Also we're not really sure how to get a hold of them to tell them to come back!?! Would they even want to?!?

So sure 300 FAA interns being fired, isn't going to make planes fall out of the sky but firing another group may just lead to some pretty big issues. I guess you like FAFO? Most don't
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT