ADVERTISEMENT

I need a lesson in religion

It's the real reason society is devolving. It's not capitalism or socialism. We're just all cousins and each subsequent generation has more chromosome problems. You think we could build the pyramids today? Fat chance.
 
Yeah, Genesis is not a good start for a book that is supposed to be the divine inspiration of an omnipotent being. We start with just Adam. Then we add Eve. They have Cain and Abel. Cain kills Abel - which means an astonishing 25% murder rate in the earliest days of civilization! God might have wanted to re-evaluate his whole plan at that point.

Anyway, Cain then moves to another town and takes a wife.

Wait...what? Where did this town come from? Where did his wife come from?

The bible really is a silly book, filled with silly nonsense.
 
Still waitin on a answer. How does two populate the world with out incest? Adam must of went on alot of dad daughter date nites. Damn that adam was a sly dude and god sittin in the closet watchin. WOW seems like a decent guy So if there was incest there had to have been a rape involved and god sat back and watched.
 
Still waitin on a answer. How does two populate the world with out incest? Adam must of went on alot of dad daughter date nites. Damn that adam was a sly dude and god sittin in the closet watchin. WOW seems like a decent guy So if there was incest there had to have been a rape involved and god sat back and watched.

Fast forward to Noah and the Ark, they had to repopulate as well. Lots of incest in the good ole book.
 
Still waitin on a answer. How does two populate the world with out incest? Adam must of went on alot of dad daughter date nites. Damn that adam was a sly dude and god sittin in the closet watchin. WOW seems like a decent guy So if there was incest there had to have been a rape involved and god sat back and watched.

If you knew the answer, there wouldn't be any point in faith. Stop thinking so much about incest. Unless you're making a Pixies album.
 
Subjective!
1140-oahu-hero.jpg
 
Next question who was the 2nd female created? He had to know he needed to delete the gene pool.
 

Yeah, Genesis is not a good start for a book that is supposed to be the divine inspiration of an omnipotent being. We start with just Adam. Then we add Eve. They have Cain and Abel. Cain kills Abel - which means an astonishing 25% murder rate in the earliest days of civilization! God might have wanted to re-evaluate his whole plan at that point.

Anyway, Cain then moves to another town and takes a wife.

Wait...what? Where did this town come from? Where did his wife come from?

The bible really is a silly book, filled with silly nonsense.

My understanding is that Genesis does not indicate that Adam and Eve and their children were the only people alive. I think most people just make that assumption.
 
My understanding is that Genesis does not indicate that Adam and Eve and their children were the only people alive. I think most people just make that assumption.

When something doesn't support your beliefs in the Bible, it is important to add editorial context and fill in the gaps of what God probably wanted or meant.

When something does support your beliefs in the Bible, it is the infallible word of God and cannot be interpreted any other way.

Doesn't that sum it up?
 
When something doesn't support your beliefs in the Bible, it is important to add editorial context and fill in the gaps of what God probably wanted or meant.

When something does support your beliefs in the Bible, it is the infallible word of God and cannot be interpreted any other way.

Doesn't that sum it up?

If it doesn't say it, than how who are we to read it in there?
 
When something doesn't support your beliefs in the Bible, it is important to add editorial context and fill in the gaps of what God probably wanted or meant.

When something does support your beliefs in the Bible, it is the infallible word of God and cannot be interpreted any other way.

Doesn't that sum it up?
You can say this about other things as well, including political beliefs. In fact, it could be said that people have a natural tendency toward tribalism and dogma, and that religion has just been replaced by political dogma for many, a sort of new religion.
 
Not that I think you're looking for a serious answer...

There are numerous examples of incest in the Bible. The most commonly thought-of examples are the sons/daughters of Adam and Eve (Genesis 4), Abraham marrying his half-sister Sarah (Genesis 20:12), Lot and his daughters (Genesis 19), Moses’ father Amram who married his aunt Jochebed (Exodus 6:20), and David’s son Amnon with his half-sister Tamar (2 Samuel 13). It is important to note, however, that in two of the above instances (Tamar and Lot), one of the parties involved was an unwilling participant in the incest—better described as rape in those cases.

It is important to distinguish between incestuous relationships prior to God commanding against them (Leviticus 18:6–18) and incest that occurred after God’s commands had been revealed. Until God commanded against it, it was not incest. It was just marrying a close relative. It is undeniable that God allowed “incest” in the early centuries of humanity. Since Adam and Eve were the only two human beings on earth, their sons and daughters had no choice but to marry and reproduce with their siblings and close relatives. The second generation had to marry their cousins, just as after the flood the grandchildren of Noah had to intermarry amongst their cousins. One reason that incest is so strongly discouraged in the world today is the understanding that reproduction between closely related individuals has a much higher risk of causing genetic abnormalities. In the early days of humanity, though, this was not a risk due to the fact that the human genetic code was relatively free of defects.

Another consideration is that incest today almost always involves a pre-pubescent or powerless victim, and the perpetrator is abusing his or her authority with the goal of unilateral sexual pleasure. By that standard, the “incest” of the Bible has nothing whatsoever in common with modern-day incest. There was no power difference between Cain and his wife, for example; the goal of Abraham and Sarah’s marriage was to create a family. Intermarriage among close family members was a necessity in the generations immediately following Adam and Noah and was not a sinful perversion of sex.

It seems that, by the time of Moses, the human genetic code had become polluted enough that close intermarriage was no longer safe. So, God commanded against sexual relations with siblings, half-siblings, parents, and aunts/uncles (Genesis 2:24 seems to indicate that marriage and sexual relations between parents and children were never allowed by God). It was not until many centuries later that humanity discovered the genetic reason that incest is unsafe and unwise. Genetics was not an issue in the early centuries of humanity, and the marriages that occurred between Adam and Eve’s children, Abraham and Sarah, and Amram and Jochebed were not selfish pursuits of sexual gratification or abuses of authority; accordingly, those relationships should not be viewed as incestuous. The key is that sexual relations between close relatives were viewed differently pre-Law and post-Law. It did not become “incest” until God commanded against it.

https://www.gotquestions.org/incest-in-the-Bible.html
 
Watching you people flail about trying to make coherent statements about religion is amusing.

In your last post you inferred things that are not written.

Yeah, Genesis is not a good start for a book that is supposed to be the divine inspiration of an omnipotent being. We start with just Adam. Then we add Eve. They have Cain and Abel. Cain kills Abel - which means an astonishing 25% murder rate in the earliest days of civilization! God might have wanted to re-evaluate his whole plan at that point.

Anyway, Cain then moves to another town and takes a wife.

Wait...what? Where did this town come from? Where did his wife come from?

The bible really is a silly book, filled with silly nonsense.
 
So god created Adam and Eve and they did the dirty deed and had offspring that populated the planet. How does one take two people and populate a planet without having incest. Seems like a ban should be had on bible?
(Whispering because I know I will get attacked)

Neither creation story (the one in Genesis 1 or the completely different one in Genesis 2) are scientific. They are creation mythologies, read them as metaphor.
 
So god created Adam and Eve and they did the dirty deed and had offspring that populated the planet. How does one take two people and populate a planet without having incest. Seems like a ban should be had on bible?
“What are you doing, step Cain?
 
Still waitin on a answer. How does two populate the world with out incest? Adam must of went on alot of dad daughter date nites. Damn that adam was a sly dude and god sittin in the closet watchin. WOW seems like a decent guy So if there was incest there had to have been a rape involved and god sat back and watched.
After Seth was born he almost assuradly had incest with his sister. Then the next generation lay with their cousins. And then the next with their 2nd cousins and so on. Only then did God command that there be no more incest. Yep, its a icky story, but you can handle it now that your sister is off limits.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT