ADVERTISEMENT

I need a lesson in religion

.... im asking you to elaborate. Its easy to post a book and say, here, read this. If you have a compelling argument, make one. Otherwise I will assume you cant.
You can assume whatever you wish. Making an argument on any controversial topic, much less a religious one, in this time of setting is an exercise in futility. The resources are available if you wish to take advantage. If you are truly interested in discussing this topic then you can DM me.
 
Nothing traumatic. Grew up a catholic then became older & realized how crazy all the aspects of religion entail. Hate how it gets pulled into politics & every day life so I laugh at adults who believe in sky fairies. Not just christianity, I enjoy mocking all religions, same as I do Clone fans.
well at least we agree on the Clone fans lol.
and as far as religion and politics go, shouldn't ever be that way.. Jesus rejected the politics of his day and refused to be King, even though the Jews wanted him to lead a revolt against Rome. He preached about Gods Kingdom, that would be the true source of solving all of mankinds problems. Problem is most religion who claim to represent the God of the Bible, throw their support behind earthly governements, thus turning their back on the very Lord and Savior they claim to follow.
 
Nothing traumatic. Grew up a catholic then became older & realized how crazy all the aspects of religion entail. Hate how it gets pulled into politics & every day life so I laugh at adults who believe in sky fairies. Not just christianity, I enjoy mocking all religions, same as I do Clone fans.

Have you ever studied Thomas Aquinas or Saint Augustine?

They're pretty amazing. You could study them for a lifetime and not get your fill.
 
I pretty much fall in line with Ricky Gervais on religion. I'm not saying there is no higher being, but the utter nonsense of so many religions is beyond stupid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HawkRugged17
This is a truth claim. Prove it.

I don't need to prove something that has never been proven. It is your belief. So be it. There is no evidence to prove that heaven or hell exist.

And for my Catholic HROT friends, by your own definition infants that die before joining the church / baptized are in this fictional area called purgatory.
 
I don't need to prove something that has never been proven. It is your belief. So be it. There is no evidence to prove that heaven or hell exist.

And for my Catholic HROT friends, by your own definition infants that die before joining the church / baptized are in this fictional area called purgatory.
You seem like a shoddy lawyer.
 
How can we know that there is a God?

"The heavens declare the glory of God, the sky above
proclaims His handiwork." Psalm 19:1

By looking at nature we can see the handiwork of God.
He created the sun, moon, and stars. He creates the
rain & snow as well as the four seasons of Spring, Summer,
Fall, and Winter. God has created day and night.

Of course God is also the Creator of the mountains, the
oceans, the plains, the birds, the fish, the land animals.
and human beings. By looking at nature we know there
is a God.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HawkFan1298
But you're going to die and you'll be dead forever.

Atheism is just a terrible bet.

If there is a God I think it would be able to see thru the bullshit of believing just to be safe.

Kind of like being good because you're scared of punishment, not because you're actually a good person.
 
No, but the use of the bible as a reason for why the bible is true isnt really an argument at all. Its blind faith.
I understand your skepticism and will frame my questions to concur that the need for truth is important.

It is noteworthy that the Bible has written chronicals of historic events. Remove religion from this conversation for a moment and most scholars conclude that the Bible has true historical references (many at that).

Next, what does one do with an ancient text (the most popular text in the world) that contains hundreds of accurate prophecies? One correct prophecy is astonishing let alone hundreds. One of those prophecies has even occurred in some of our lifetimes that has been witnessed first-hand (the reformation of Israel in a day). From a strictly scholarly viewpoint, this is important to study and learn about, no? Belief in the faith aside, most would agree that the Bible contains lots of truth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HawkFan1298
I understand your skepticism and will frame my questions to concur that the need for truth is important.

It is noteworthy that the Bible has written chronicals of historic events. Remove religion from this conversation for a moment and most scholars conclude that the Bible has true historical references (many at that).

Next, what does one do with an ancient text (the most popular text in the world) that contains hundreds of accurate prophecies? One correct prophecy is astonishing let alone hundreds. One of those prophecies has even occurred in some of our lifetimes that has been witnessed first-hand (the reformation of Israel in a day). From a strictly scholarly viewpoint, this is important to study and learn about, no? Belief in the faith aside, most would agree that the Bible contains lots of truth.
The bible is not a historical text. Its a religious one. Just because there are things in it that refer to real people, places, and events does nothing to prove in the mythical elements. Also can you say with 100% confidence that Israel and Zionism in itself is not a large scale self-fulfilling prophecy?

Id be curious about the hundreds of other accurate prophecies youre talking about.
 
The bible is not a historical text. Its a religious one. Just because there are things in it that refer to real people, places, and events does nothing to prove in the mythical elements. Also can you say with 100% confidence that Israel and Zionism in itself is not a large scale self-fulfilling prophecy?

Id be curious about the hundreds of other accurate prophecies youre talking about.
Again, I’m framing this with faith removed from the conversation. I’d argue that it is foolish for secularists to declare the Bible as “untrue.” The Old Testment is a historical record of the people of Israel. This really cannot be argued.

As for Israel being a self-fulfilled prophecy I would vehemently disagree. If you know your modern day history of Israel then you would know how unlikely it really was that Israel came back into existence. Then, it is also a modern-day miracle that Israel has maintained their existence since 1948. It is not self-fulfilling since many fought against (and still do) for Israel’s existence.

As for other correct prophecies that are documented and supported through archaeology, a few are:

-Babylon rules over Judah for 70 years
-Babylon’s gates open for Cyrus
-Babylon’s kingdom is destroyed
-God rescues the Jews from Babylonian rule and brings them safety
-Ninevah destroyed by fire
-Tyre attacked by many nations & Tyre’s stones, timber and soil thrown into the sea
-Edom will be destroyed
-Israel will be scattered
-Israel will be victorious over its enemy and rebuilt and gardens will bloom again
-Egypt will not rule over other nations

These are just a few that are well established and verifiable through historical & archaeological evidence. There are many others but I omitted those since they relate to the birth of Christ and His life.
 
Again, I’m framing this with faith removed from the conversation. I’d argue that it is foolish for secularists to declare the Bible as “untrue.”
To say the bible is a good source for why God exists is not example of "faith removed".


As for Israel being a self-fulfilled prophecy I would vehemently disagree. If you know your modern day history of Israel then you would know how unlikely it really was that Israel came back into existence.
Ok, make your point. I know enough to be dangerous.

-Babylon rules over Judah for 70 years
-Babylon’s gates open for Cyrus
-Babylon’s kingdom is destroyed
-God rescues the Jews from Babylonian rule and brings them safety
-Ninevah destroyed by fire
-Tyre attacked by many nations & Tyre’s stones, timber and soil thrown into the sea
-Edom will be destroyed
-Israel will be scattered
-Israel will be victorious over its enemy and rebuilt and gardens will bloom again
-Egypt will not rule over other nations
I dont know enough about these really address it. I remain skeptical though. Religious types have a tendency to fit an event to their narrative.

Also, none of these things do anything to prove the mythology.
 
Describe what we're looking for it and where it's supposed to be, and let's see if we can find it.
Spiritual transcendence. You can probably find it within yourself. But you won't find it unless you look. It takes more than just faith I believe. Those that don't find it will simply be removed from the collective unconsciousness, like a farmer pulling the weeds. It's not easy. I'll probably be one of the weeds.
 
As for other correct prophecies that are documented and supported through archaeology, a few are:

-Babylon rules over Judah for 70 years
-Babylon’s gates open for Cyrus
-Babylon’s kingdom is destroyed
-God rescues the Jews from Babylonian rule and brings them safety
-Ninevah destroyed by fire
-Tyre attacked by many nations & Tyre’s stones, timber and soil thrown into the sea
-Edom will be destroyed
-Israel will be scattered
-Israel will be victorious over its enemy and rebuilt and gardens will bloom again
Interesting stuff. I'd be interested in knowing when these were prophesied and when they occurred.

As I understand it the oldest OTs we have are translations dating back only 2-3 centuries BC. So I'm assuming all these things happened after that. Otherwise they might be history, but not prophesy.

It would also be fun to see the words of prophesy lined up with the actual events that are said to have fulfilled them, just to see if the prophesies are actually clear and were actually fulfilled.

There is, of course, one other huge problem with using prophesies as proof. Namely what's the difference between prophesy and just smart guesswork?

People predict the future all the time. Sometimes they are right. We may praise them, but that doesn't mean other things they say are necessarily going to be right. And it definitely doesn't prove they were guided by God, or that God's hand can be seen in the outcome they correctly predicted.
 
Spiritual transcendence. You can probably find it within yourself. But you won't find it unless you look. It takes more than just faith I believe. Those that don't find it will simply be removed from the collective unconsciousness, like a farmer pulling the weeds. It's not easy. I'll probably be one of the weeds.
This is not an answer.
 
To say the bible is a good source for why God exists is not example of "faith removed".



Ok, make your point. I know enough to be dangerous.


I dont know enough about these really address it. I remain skeptical though. Religious types have a tendency to fit an event to their narrative.

Also, none of these things do anything to prove the mythology.
I am merely speaking of facts that the Bible presents. It is not my job to compel you to faith. The Bible however should be examined closely and merits scholarly review from believers as well as non-believers.

Re Israel, I find it to be a modern day miracle that is exists at all today. Between 1945 and early 1948 there was no appetite in the world to make this happen. There were just a few other things going on. Even so, for every 1,000 Jews who wanted to return to their homeland, there were a million ready to fight against it. It was “formed in a day” just as the Bible predicted via the UN. Arabs went to war the very next day and lost. Israel had no formal anything yet they still pushed back the Islamists. In 1967, things were again stacked against Israel yet they prevailed again. Iran openly admits to wanting to wipe Israel off the face of the Earth and yet, Israel still stands.
 
Spiritual transcendence. You can probably find it within yourself. But you won't find it unless you look. It takes more than just faith I believe. Those that don't find it will simply be removed from the collective unconsciousness, like a farmer pulling the weeds. It's not easy. I'll probably be one of the weeds.
We were talking about heaven and hell.

I do like your weed comment, though. It fits one of the religions I invented.
 
Interesting stuff. I'd be interested in knowing when these were prophesied and when they occurred.

As I understand it the oldest OTs we have are translations dating back only 2-3 centuries BC. So I'm assuming all these things happened after that. Otherwise they might be history, but not prophesy.

It would also be fun to see the words of prophesy lined up with the actual events that are said to have fulfilled them, just to see if the prophesies are actually clear and were actually fulfilled.

There is, of course, one other huge problem with using prophesies as proof. Namely what's the difference between prophesy and just smart guesswork?

People predict the future all the time. Sometimes they are right. We may praise them, but that doesn't mean other things they say are necessarily going to be right. And it definitely doesn't prove they were guided by God, or that God's hand can be seen in the outcome they correctly predicted.
The Dead Sea Scrolls helped put a lot of this to rest. The prohphecies are numerous and specific, not general predictions.

There was a mathematician who reviewed the probability of a these prophecies and even just a few coming true and the number he came up with had a lot of zero’s.

 
Interesting stuff. I'd be interested in knowing when these were prophesied and when they occurred.

As I understand it the oldest OTs we have are translations dating back only 2-3 centuries BC. So I'm assuming all these things happened after that. Otherwise they might be history, but not prophesy.

It would also be fun to see the words of prophesy lined up with the actual events that are said to have fulfilled them, just to see if the prophesies are actually clear and were actually fulfilled.

There is, of course, one other huge problem with using prophesies as proof. Namely what's the difference between prophesy and just smart guesswork?

People predict the future all the time. Sometimes they are right. We may praise them, but that doesn't mean other things they say are necessarily going to be right. And it definitely doesn't prove they were guided by God, or that God's hand can be seen in the outcome they correctly predicted.

There are no objectively fulfilled prophecies in the Bible, none.
 
The Dead Sea Scrolls helped put a lot of this to rest. The prohphecies are numerous and specific, not general predictions.

There was a mathematician who reviewed the probability of a these prophecies and even just a few coming true and the number he came up with had a lot of zero’s.

Prophecy written around 1400 BC
Exodus 12:5
5 Your lamb shall be without blemish, a male of the first year. You may take it from the sheep or from
the goats.
Fulfilled 6-7 BC to 30 AD


You see why this ^ is proof of nothing right?
 
Prophecy written around 1400 BC
Exodus 12:5
5 Your lamb shall be without blemish, a male of the first year. You may take it from the sheep or from
the goats.
Fulfilled 6-7 BC to 30 AD


You see why this ^ is proof of nothing right?
From your perspective, sure. That’s why I purposefully omitted any direct prophecies related to Christ and focused on those of historical and archaeological relevance.

From my perspective, Christ was prophesied in the first page of the Bible. But that is not what I am offering up for discussion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HawkFan1298
This is lifted from the Vatican's official English version and does seem to support @Hoosierhawkeye assertion:

[1:26] Then God said, "Let us make humankind in our image, according to our likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the wild animals of the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the earth."
[1:27] So God created humankind in his image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them.​

I don't take anything in the Bible literally and have no horse in this

This is lifted from the Vatican's official English version and does seem to support @Hoosierhawkeye assertion:

[1:26] Then God said, "Let us make humankind in our image, according to our likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the wild animals of the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the earth."
[1:27] So God created humankind in his image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them.​

I don't take anything in the Bible literally and have no horse in this race. My question is why does God use the term "us"? Multiple personalities?
https://pin.it/7qo8Rje
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Obviously Oblivious
From your perspective, sure. That’s why I purposefully omitted any direct prophecies related to Christ and focused on those of historical and archaeological relevance.

From my perspective, Christ was prophesied in the first page of the Bible. But that is not what I am offering up for discussion.
.... well show me the prophecies then because after going through your link, it looks like Nostradomus crap.
 
If there is God, he is an evil God, letting such terrible things happen on this planet. You can't give thanks to God without giving him/her/it blame as well.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT