If Naturalwma Gets Married, Can a Good Christian Still "Like" His Posts?
- Thread starter What Would Jesus Do?
- Start date
I like his posts and I am a Catholic.
I draw a distinction in these cases; I believe in the special nature of the man/woman union and the religious aspect, but I fully support the equal legal status on the civil side. I dont consider it marriage, but if people want to call it that for themselves, fine.
I draw a distinction in these cases; I believe in the special nature of the man/woman union and the religious aspect, but I fully support the equal legal status on the civil side. I dont consider it marriage, but if people want to call it that for themselves, fine.
I just don't understand why anyone would ever give a flying F about someone else's marital status.I thought misery was supposed to love company.
Other than the bit about "sin" that's how I feel. Why is baking a cake or issuing a marriage license different? Why can't those folks disapprove but still do their job?
Sure, I get that no one is insisting that you like nat's posts, whereas they are insisting that those folks do their job. But you are required to log in here - to this den of iniquity - and some would say that by doing so you are supporting gay marriage just as much as you would by baking a cake for a gay wedding.
You can choose to log in or not log in. They can choose to do their job or quit. Those choices seems on a par to me.
This is a tuff one. 9,10,8,2,7,4,6,3,11,1,5.
That's the price of forgetting your prayer rug.
And why is that other guy being allowed to desecrate the cross?
They could not just LIKE, but LOVE his posts. It would have nothing to do with his marital status or who the catcher is when he's pitching (or catching, as it were).
There is no possibility of marriage for any gay or lesbian,
since marriage was instituted by God for one man and
one woman.
However, if two gays or two lesbians want a civil union
with all the tax breaks, inheritance perks ,etc. so be it.
Bottom Line: Natural could still change teams. He might
discover that there is nothing more beautiful than
a woman's body and begin to investigate the possibilities...
since marriage was instituted by God for one man and
one woman.
However, if two gays or two lesbians want a civil union
with all the tax breaks, inheritance perks ,etc. so be it.
Bottom Line: Natural could still change teams. He might
discover that there is nothing more beautiful than
a woman's body and begin to investigate the possibilities...
Funny you asked this, I used to date a girl who "loved the gheys". I told her that I was raised more traditionally and didn't think them getting married was a big deal at all.
It came down to her almost nagging me about it, quite a bit. I would tell her if it came down to a vote, she could vote how she wanted and I would do the same. It wasn't enough for her that I simply disagreed with her.
Now that it has been legalized, she asked me if I would make a big deal about it. I said, "no it's the law of the land". Which means, I may not agree with it however I accept it. I could sit down and have dinner with natural, go to a game, or he could be my wingman at a bar. I have no problem liking his posts and I don't think he has a problem liking mine either.
What SSG and swag said, although I'd never like swag's posts, that pre-Madonna, podcast queen.
Marriage is ultimately stupid, so yes. I would just ask him why he traded daily cornflakes, for the nonstop fun pack cereals.
I'm still trying to figure out what the hell the question means?
Until I do, I'll err on the side that it's stupid.
Until I do, I'll err on the side that it's stupid.
Not a good Christian, but if the topic isn't about gay stuff, why would it matter? Like is for the post, not the poster.
You can change team too Lute. You might discover there is nothing more beautiful than a man's dilated sphincter.
Its amazing that people still think its a choice.
Well, no one minds eating different kinds of cereal everyday, it's just when the other one starts asking for the same. Jealousy, it's a terrible thing.
It doesn't need to be. Give up the idea that you own your partner. Play together. Break out of the traditional family structure. I admit that all might be easier when you are inherently a non traditional family from conception. Just one more reason why it's a lifestyle worth choosing.
I don't own a partner Natural, I rent a whole lot of them though. No need to teach a fellow master my friend.
Once I've taken a bite of cereal, it's my cereal until I decide i'm bored. Male ego,...whatever you want to call it.
That's the ownership mentality. Set your cereal free. It will make it taste better.
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
-
BREAKING: Brendan Sullivan Listed as QB1 Ahead of Game vs. Wisconsin- Latest: St. Louis Hawk