Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wow, you're post to like ratio sucks ballz. I don't want anything to do with your version of the world.Imagine this world.
There is a Republican Party? Haven't seen any evidence in yearsImagine this world.
Repubs are already working hard to now suppress the IG report due out Monday. Billy Bob Barr is working hard for his client now that he sees the report doesnt say what Trump has been screaming about for 2 yrs- I guess the conspiracy is over- also sounds like Obama wont be going to jail.
Since the "Liberal" media will pounce on the report I imagine the POTUS/GOP will have to have some sort of response. Here are a few expected responses:
1. POTUS to claim the report was internally sabotaged by the Deep State/Obama era sympathizers
2. GOP will seize on a seemingly small and irrelevant point from the report that shows some sort of "liberal" misconduct and make it their talking point despite the report clearly claiming it had no impact.
3. Jim Jordan will find a camera and yell.
4. Trump will tweet a complete lie about the report in a vicious tweet storm full of CAPS and misspellings.
5. Fox News will spend the day reporting on the War on Christmas.
6. Barr will come out with a "summary" of the report at a presser before it is released to mislead the public on what the report actually says.
I mean you guys know Republicans clearly don’t care about any of this at all and are just putting their heads in the sand right? That should piss off true Republicans who value their country’s integrity. Like if you can dispute this with facts I’m all ears but it isn’t going to happen.
I think it’s a topic that should be explored and understood more. If you don’t have any answers for me fine but I’m willing to listen.If you've spent any time on here, you know this thread wasn't necessary.
I think it’s a topic that should be explored and understood more. If you don’t have any answers for me fine but I’m willing to listen.
When one party completely ignores the facts, that is what you have to do. That is why I started this thread. I want to know why republicans are ignoring all logical points. Nobody has still given me a logical explanation.Nancy Pelosi six months ago: "We're not going to go down the road of impeachment unless there's bipartisan support."
Nancy Pelosi today: "We're going to impeach on a party line vote."
WOBWhen one party completely ignores the facts, that is what you have to do. That is why I started this thread. I want to know why republicans are ignoring all logical points. Nobody has still given me a logical explanation.
And still no counter point....
If only one side sees the facts as "so-called facts," then what the hell do you make of that situation? I'd say that's partisanship.
Good list. I would add:
7. Trump will tweet something outlandish and slightly offensive that is entirely unrelated to focus attention elsewhere. His typical "HEY look over here" defense.
I thought this same thing during Clinton impeachment for lying under oath.Imagine this world.
That’s the entire point. One side, your side will not even listen to the facts at all. They claim it’s false without even paying attention. And that doesn’t upset you at all?If only one side sees the so-called facts as "facts," then what the hell do you make of that situation? I'd say that's partisanship.
Imagine this world.
Congratulations you did not address the op at all. Learn to read.So what you’re saying is that every Dem candidate wanting to decriminalize all illegal immigrantion here and end deportations if anyone who illegally enters the country is an example of “country over party”? Lax border control and and a free for all immigration policy being advocated by every dem candidate is good for the country and not just good for their chances of winning the Hispanic vote?
Good grief.
Congratulations you did not address the op at all. Learn to read.
Imagine this world.
We put country over party that's why we elected President Trump.
I think it’s a topic that should be explored and understood more. If you don’t have any answers for me fine but I’m willing to listen.
We put country over party that's why we elected President Trump.
Nancy Pelosi six months ago: "We're not going to go down the road of impeachment unless there's bipartisan support."
Nancy Pelosi today: "We're going to impeach on a party line vote."
If only one side sees the so-called facts as "facts," then what the hell do you make of that situation? I'd say that's willful ignorance.
FIFYWe are in a cult, that's why we elected President Trump.
So what you’re saying is that every Dem candidate wanting to decriminalize all illegal immigrantion here and end deportations if anyone who illegally enters the country is an example of “country over party”? Lax border control and and a free for all immigration policy being advocated by every dem candidate is good for the country and not just good for their chances of winning the Hispanic vote?
Good grief.
I thought this same thing during Clinton impeachment for lying under oath.
thank you Democrat’s for teaching me right and wrong didn’t matter.
Would it surprise the OP to know that Republicans view Democrats exactly the same way?,.... this is not a one way street.
You don’t think Clinton would have granted political favors to foreign countries or worse to keep Monica info from becoming public.Yes, because lying about a blow job is on par with bribing a foreign government for one's own personal gain.
Salient point.
Since this thread has nothing to do with government spending and taxes, I'm not even sure why you're here.
So what you’re saying is that every Dem candidate wanting to decriminalize all illegal immigrantion here and end deportations if anyone who illegally enters the country is an example of “country over party”? Lax border control and and a free for all immigration policy being advocated by every dem candidate is good for the country and not just good for their chances of winning the Hispanic vote?
Good grief.
You don’t think Clinton would have granted political favors to foreign countries or worse to keep Monica info from becoming public.
maybe it happened.
You don’t think Clinton would have granted political favors to foreign countries or worse to keep Monica info from becoming public.
maybe it happened.
like most things the coverup is worse than the crime.
a sitting president should not put the country in that situation and they should not lie under oath.
Dems didn’t care than because it was “ there side”.
I don’t care anymore about either side.
both only care about accumulation of power and keeping that power. I just want taxes as low as possible so I can hoard money to get ready for the national debt destruction that’s coming.
There never was any evidence of it presented.
So, let's cut the hypotheticals, and stick with the FACT that Trump did violate the Constitution here. Clinton DID NOT violate the Constitution. He committed perjury over a blowjob.