ADVERTISEMENT

Iowa Governor ranked country’s best Governor

THE_DEVIL

HR King
Aug 16, 2005
63,351
76,434
113
Hell, Michigan
www.livecoinwatch.com
https://kelofm.com/2022/10/15/iowa-governor-ranked-countrys-best-governor/

DES MOINES, IA (KELO.com) — According to a major think-tank, Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds is number one.
The Cato Institute, a nonpartisan association, named Reynolds the top governor in the nation for fiscal responsibility in the 2022 Fiscal Policy Report Card on America’s Governors.
The biennial report card analyzes governors’ actions on state budgets, taxes and spending.
Governor Reynolds leads the pack, with a high score of 78 over five other Republican governors who also received an A grade on the report card.



logView
 
Sigh...

Just take the L torbee.
No L from me.

Conservative think tank thinks conservative governor is peachy.

What a shock 🙄

Of course the Cato institute supports a governor who wants to end restaurant inspections, agricultural regulations that protect the environment and is anti-abortion. It’s a conservative think tank.
 
No L from me.

Conservative think tank thinks conservative governor is peachy.

What a shock 🙄

Again, just take the L. It's more dignified that way.

The Cato Institute is libertarian in its political philosophy, and advocates a limited role for government in domestic and foreign affairs as well as a strong protection of civil liberties. This includes support for lowering or abolishing most taxes, opposition to the Federal Reserve system and the Affordable Care Act, the privatization of numerous government agencies and programs including Social Security and the United States Postal Service, demilitarization of the police, and adhering to a non-interventionist foreign policy.

 
  • Like
Reactions: BustingNarratives
Again, just take the L. It's more dignified that way.

The Cato Institute is libertarian in its political philosophy, and advocates a limited role for government in domestic and foreign affairs as well as a strong protection of civil liberties. This includes support for lowering or abolishing most taxes, opposition to the Federal Reserve system and the Affordable Care Act, the privatization of numerous government agencies and programs including Social Security and the United States Postal Service, demilitarization of the police, and adhering to a non-interventionist foreign policy.

Good god you are dumb 😂

Yeah, a conservative think tank likes an anti-tax, anti-regulation, anti-abortion governor.

That is neither surprising nor interesting.

You really should read more, stop being ignorant.
 
Nothing says fiscal responsibility like collecting billions in federal money but refusing to disperse it to the people.
Patience. All states have until Dec 31, 2026 to spend the money. Some are spending it like drunken sailors … others are metering it out over several fiscal years. The later approach might look wise heading in to a recession.
 
Again, just take the L. It's more dignified that way.

The Cato Institute is libertarian in its political philosophy, and advocates a limited role for government in domestic and foreign affairs as well as a strong protection of civil liberties. This includes support for lowering or abolishing most taxes, opposition to the Federal Reserve system and the Affordable Care Act, the privatization of numerous government agencies and programs including Social Security and the United States Postal Service, demilitarization of the police, and adhering to a non-interventionist foreign policy.

Northern: Cato isn't partisan.

Northern: And here's proof. A list of all the radical right wing philosophies Cato supports.
 
Patience. All states have until Dec 31, 2026 to spend the money. Some are spending it like drunken sailors … others are metering it out over several fiscal years. The later approach might look wise heading in to a recession.
Underfund schools. Keep water shitty. Fire park rangers. Make Iowa worse each year. Yeah that's some 3D chess right there.
 
Do you honestly think Kimmie will eventually start funding all this stuff? I sure don't. Why would she wait as things keep getting worse? What's the strategy there?
Probably not to the level you would want with a blank check but with four more fiscal years to spend that money I like her chances of maximizing the total gain compared to the states that wasted it with poor choices in less then two years.
 
Probably not to the level you would want with a blank check but with four more fiscal years to spend that money I like her chances of maximizing the total gain compared to the states that wasted it with poor choices in less then two years.
We need clean water now. We need fully funded schools. We need to figure out ways to keep all our small towns from dying. Every month we delay on these actions we only make these problems bigger, more expensive, and less likely to get solved.
 
We need clean water now. We need fully funded schools. We need to figure out ways to keep all our small towns from dying. Every month we delay on these actions we only make these problems bigger, more expensive, and less likely to get solved.

School funding is fine.

And get out of here with your plea for small towns. So fake...
Your side despises the people that live in them.
 
We need clean water now. We need fully funded schools. We need to figure out ways to keep all our small towns from dying. Every month we delay on these actions we only make these problems bigger, more expensive, and less likely to get solved.
I understand your concerns but none of those three issues you cited are going to get fixed with one massive infusion of cash in two years. That much money at once would just get wasted. Focus on the top priorities for the state and spend every dollar wisely through 2026 like the funding allows, especially with a recession looming.
 
Last edited:
I understand your concerns but none of those three issues you cited are going to get fixed with one massive infusion of cash in two years. That much money at once would just get wasted. Focus on the top priorities for the state and spend every dollar wisely through 2026 like the funding allows.
But she's not even starting on these problems. I agree that cleaning up our water wouldn't get done in two years. Spending the whole budget in this timeline probably would get wasted. But she hasn't even begun to lay groundwork for cleaner water. The problem grows, she has the resources to start addressing it, yet Reynolds does nothing. Why?
 
But she's not even starting on these problems. I agree that cleaning up our water wouldn't get done in two years. Spending the whole budget in this timeline probably would get wasted. But she hasn't even begun to lay groundwork for cleaner water. The problem grows, she has the resources to start addressing it, yet Reynolds does nothing. Why?
Because spending a certain amount would take away the tax cuts she promised to some people who are giving her money.
 
But she's not even starting on these problems. I agree that cleaning up our water wouldn't get done in two years. Spending the whole budget in this timeline probably would get wasted. But she hasn't even begun to lay groundwork for cleaner water. The problem grows, she has the resources to start addressing it, yet Reynolds does nothing. Why?
That’s not true on the water issue. $100 million has already been allocated with more to come.

 
Like ending the state tax on retirement income?

That isnt "some people" that's all people once you reach the age.

That's progress.
Exactly. It’s the reason this cat is keeping his permanent residence in Iowa now and not moving to a low/no tax state. Even Illinois does not tax retirement income and Iowa is in much better shape financially.
 
That’s not true on the water issue. $100 million has already been allocated with more to come.

She has received over $10 billion in federal money since 2020 (money she opposes, btw), but has only managed to invest 1% to clean up our water? It's one of the biggest problems in Iowa.
 
11% of that $100 million is going to the Field of Dreams alone. This is a massive problem. $100 just won't cut it.

Also, it puts on full display how bad Reynolds is at her job that she opposed the infrastructure plan where all of this money came from in the first place. That deeply reflects negatively on her. If she got her way there wouldn't even be a fund at all.

 
Last edited:
Exactly. It’s the reason this cat is keeping his permanent residence in Iowa now and not moving to a low/no tax state. Even Illinois does not tax retirement income and Iowa is in much better shape financially.
That tax cut was happening anyway. Withholding funds for infrastructure, water, education, that was about more corporate tax cuts.
 
ADVERTISEMENT