ADVERTISEMENT

Iowa Rep. Steve King endorses Ted Cruz for president

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
79,364
62,380
113
Republican presidential candidate Ted Cruz received a big endorsement today from a leading member of Iowa’s conservative Christian right bloc – U.S. Rep. Steve King.

King, who did not endorse in 2012, said he believes the Texas senator has the ability to “unite conservatives” and build an organization to defeat Democrat Hillary Clinton.

“(Ted Cruz) has consistently and tirelessly fought on the issues that matter most to conservatives, such as Obamacare, religious liberty, life and stopping Obama’s lawless executive actions,” said King in a press release.

King’s endorsement may make it tough for four other candidates in the Republican presidential field to win over Iowa’s powerful religious right community: Ben Carson, Bobby Jindal, Rick Santorum and Mike Huckabee.

King’s endorsement was seen by many as an attempt for the conservative right community to begin winnowing the field and putting its support behind a single candidate.

http://www.omaha.com/news/iowa/iowa...cle_97822daa-8c81-11e5-8ecf-b75004c88cd0.html
 
Ted Cruz is the worst. He's a big reason why Boehner resigned.

Cruz says things like he's going to abolish the IRS and overturn Obamacare. He KNOWS that those things are impossible, he's just saying it to rile his base.

I always thought this Dana Milbank column on Cruz was one of the best descriptions of him:

During the 2000 presidential campaign, I went to Austin to profile the whippersnappers on George W. Bush’s team. Bush headquarters was full of young talent, but one man surprised me with his blatant audition to be featured in my article.

This eager staffer told me about how at Princeton he was the nation’s top debater, about his Supreme Court clerkship and his time on the Harvard Law Review, and about his well-placed connections. When I mentioned this self-promotional effort to a senior Bush adviser, I received a knowing eye-roll in response, and I decided to focus my profile on somebody else.

Perhaps I should have listened to the ambitious fellow: His name was R. Ted Cruz, and he is now a shoo-in to be the next U.S. senator from Texas. He kept me informed of his progress as he worked his way up through the Bush Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission before heading home to be Texas’ solicitor general.

These days we’re hearing about a different Ted Cruz: darling of the tea party, choice of Sarah Palin and Glenn Beck. This Ted Cruz wants to abolish the Commerce, Education and Energy departments, the IRS and the Transportation Security Administration.

I don’t doubt that Cruz holds conservative views. But a lot of the excess in the ideas he expresses now is surely less about ideology than expediency. The ambitious Cruz recognized that aligning himself with the burgeoning tea party movement would help propel him past the favorite to win the Republican Senate primary.

I reached out to Cruz’s campaign to see whether he would talk to me; I thought he should be portrayed as something more than a tea party caricature. But my requests were ignored; in his current incarnation, being promoted in the mainstream media is apparently no longer desirable. Still, I am comforted by the theory that Cruz is driven more by ambition than by tea party doctrine.

In this sense, I put Cruz in a category with the Republicans’ new vice presidential candidate, Paul Ryan, a product of the elite Miami University of Ohio and a reasonable man who hardened his views to keep up with the Republicans’ ascendant conservatism. These are intellectually curious, liberal-arts conservatives who, although far to the right, are not temperamentally as unreasonable as they must pretend. If I’m correct that these are ambitious men using the tea party to get what they want, this could be good news if they achieve power and the irrational passions of the moment fade.

When I met Cruz a dozen years ago, I recognized his breed of Ivy League conservative. In the Yale Political Union, where I debated a quarter-century ago, there was a group called the Party of the Right, a band of young men who read Ayn Rand and were forever trying to get the union to hold a moment of silence in memory of Britain’s Charles the Martyr. A few were off the deep end, but most were harmless: They enjoyed mixing it up in debates on esoteric topics. Their far-out positions were taken, mostly, with a twinkle in the eye, and they went off to careers on Wall Street.

In Cruz, there is still evidence of this type of debating-society conservative. His law firm bio boasts that he “argued more cases before the U.S. Supreme Court than any other lawyer in Texas” and puts his win-loss record as 23-4. It also notes that the National Association of Attorneys General awarded him the “Best Brief Award” for five straight years.

So how to reconcile that conventionally ambitious Cruz with the one who, in his recent victory speech, thanked, among others, Palin, Beck, Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, Rand Paul, Ron Paul, FreedomWorks and the Tea Party Express.

Maybe I’m kidding myself, but I prefer to believe Cruz is playing the tea party for his own gain. The Senate can tolerate an operator more easily than another ideologue.

http://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/l...5-dana-milbank-which-is-the-real-ted-cruz.ece
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrianNole09
So you're saying you think King is pretty and sane? Ok moondoggie.
Did I say that ? NO ! I am a Conservative, Christian. This country is being led into the abyss by the Left and their agenda's . We need to right the ship. And it is not being PC. And Natural I have never attacked you for being what you are. I am a believer that a true conservative can help get the country back on track.
 
Did I say that ? NO ! I am a Conservative, Christian. This country is being led into the abyss by the Left and their agenda's . We need to right the ship. And it is not being PC. And Natural I have never attacked you for being what you are. I am a believer that a true conservative can help get the country back on track.
Of course you said that when you made sanity and looks your objection to the opposition. If you want a conservative, vote for Paul. Cruz and King are insane radicals. Nothing even a little bit conservative about where they want to take the nation.
 
Of course you said that when you made sanity and looks your objection to the opposition. If you want a conservative, vote for Paul. Cruz and King are insane radicals. Nothing even a little bit conservative about where they want to take the nation.
Lol.
 
Of course you said that when you made sanity and looks your objection to the opposition. If you want a conservative, vote for Paul. Cruz and King are insane radicals. Nothing even a little bit conservative about where they want to take the nation.

Paul is probably the most liberal person running...at least in the classic liberal sense, before people started changing the definition of words.
 
Did I say that ? NO ! I am a Conservative, Christian. This country is being led into the abyss by the Left and their agenda's . We need to right the ship. And it is not being PC. And Natural I have never attacked you for being what you are. I am a believer that a true conservative can help get the country back on track.
How will more tax cuts for the wealthy, fewer regulations on trashing the environment, cuts to the safety net, and teaching bad science "help get the country back on track"?
 
Did I say that ? NO ! I am a Conservative, Christian. This country is being led into the abyss by the Left and their agenda's . We need to right the ship. And it is not being PC. And Natural I have never attacked you for being what you are. I am a believer that a true conservative can help get the country back on track.
Cruz and King are ultra right wing nut jobs. Who gives a $hit if a candidate is Christian or not? That's just insane thinking as far as I'm concerned.
 
Do you think Romney would qualify as Christian? How about Thomas Jefferson and George Washington?

I had a book on the religions of the founders, but it's been a while since I read it. Very interesting book. I think it was called 'Faith of the Founders' or something like that. I think the only real Christian was James Madison. Most of them were monotheists and Benjamin Franklin was a polytheist.
 
I had a book on the religions of the founders, but it's been a while since I read it. Very interesting book. I think it was called 'Faith of the Founders' or something like that. I think the only real Christian was James Madison. Most of them were monotheists and Benjamin Franklin was a polytheist.
I hadn't heard that theory on Ben before. I wonder if your book was citing a younger belief he moved away from? Franklin laid out his belief system near his death in a letter. While not Christian owing to his opinion on Jesus, he professed to believe in one God and an immortal soul.

"Here is my Creed: I believe in one God, Creator of the Universe. That He governs it by his Providence. That he ought to be worshipped. That the most acceptable Service we can render to him, is doing Good to his other Children. That the Soul of Man is immortal, and will be treated with Justice in another Life respecting its Conduct in this. These I take to be the fundamental Principles of all sound Religion, and I regard them as you do, in whatever Sect I meet with them. As to Jesus of Nazareth, my Opinion of whom you particularly desire, I think the System of Morals and his Religion as he left them to us, the best the World ever saw, or is likely to see; but I apprehend it has received various corrupting Changes, and I have with most of the present Dissenters in England, some Doubts as to his Divinity: tho' it is a Question I do not dogmatise upon, having never studied it, and think it needless to busy myself with it now, when I expect soon an Opportunity of knowing the Truth with less Trouble. I see no harm however in its being believed, if that Belief has the good Consequence as probably it has, of making his Doctrines more respected and better observed, especially as I do not perceive that the Supreme takes it amiss, by distinguishing the Believers, in his Government of the World, with any particular Marks of his Displeasure."

http://www.beliefnet.com/resourcelib/docs/44/Letter_from_Benjamin_Franklin_to_Ezra_Stiles_1.html
 
  • Like
Reactions: lucas80
You're just a religious bigot. Christ wasn't.
Oh I think you give the character of Jesus too much credit. He was not tolerant of other religions. He flat out said he was the only path to salvation and that his followers should convert everyone. One path to eternal life and saying other faiths are wrong is not a tolerant position. Jesus would probably think only a Jew should be President, he was Jewish after all, not Christian.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mstp1992
Did I say that ? NO ! I am a Conservative, Christian. This country is being led into the abyss by the Left and their agenda's . We need to right the ship. And it is not being PC. And Natural I have never attacked you for being what you are. I am a believer that a true conservative can help get the country back on track.

Dadgummit, them there whippersnappers done been pole-yackin' with 'em there guttersnipes an' now the whole dang country done be living' in sum hippy Homersexual commune right now!
 
Oh I think you give the character of Jesus too much credit. He was not tolerant of other religions. He flat out said he was the only path to salvation and that his followers should convert everyone. One path to eternal life and saying other faiths are wrong is not a tolerant position. Jesus would probably think only a Jew should be President, he was Jewish after all, not Christian.
So, if Speedway (and others like him) are truly followers of Jesus Christ then Bernie Sanders is their man.

FB_IMG_1433510300433.jpg


tumblr_nw7yn7dJsA1ui3cmto1_1280.jpg
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT