ADVERTISEMENT

Iowans claim instances when Sanders was shorted delegates

moral_victory

HB Legend
Jan 21, 2014
11,094
15,980
113
http://www.desmoinesregister.com/st...nces-when-sanders-shorted-delegates/79902080/

Keane Schwarz is certain he knows the outcome of the vote in his precinct: He was the lone caucusgoer in Woodbury County No. 43.

But the Iowa Democratic Party's final results state that Hillary Clinton won one county delegate and Bernie Sanders received zero.

"I voted for Bernie," Schwarz, 36, of Oto, told The Des Moines Register. “It was really suspicious … I’m actually pretty irate about it.”

Some complaints that Iowa Democrats have shared with the Register about discrepancies in caucus results appear to be valid. Others stem from confusion over how the math-heavy delegate-awarding system works in the Democrats' caucus process.

Party officials on Friday night were still reviewing reports and correcting errors and hadn’t yet shared candidates' updated totals of state delegate equivalents, which determine the winner of the caucuses.

Sanders’ backers are more likely than Clinton’s to think the political system is rigged, polling has found. So it might not come as a surprise, especially since he lost by a hairsbreadth, that some think the Democratic caucus system is rigged. It also doesn't help the optics that the state party chairwoman drove around for years in a car with “HRC2016” license plates.

Several caucusgoers told the Register they thought Sanders had been shorted county delegates, including in Knoxville No. 3.

Molly Tedesco sports patriotic colors at Senator Marco Rubio's campaign party in the Iowa Ballroom at the Marriott in downtown Des Moines, Monday, Feb. 1, 2016. Rachel Mummey/The Register
A total of 110 people were present for the final vote, and the count was 58 people for Sanders and 52 people for Clinton — which amounted to five county delegates for Sanders and four for Clinton, said Lonnie McCombs, a 59-year-old Knoxville Democrat who is retired from careers in the military and in manufacturing,

“That’s how it was recorded,” said McCombs, a Sanders backer.

But when the Knoxville Journal Express newspaper posted the Democratic Party’s official results, it showed Knoxville No. 3 results as Clinton with five county delegates and Sanders with four.

“It cost Bernie a (county) delegate,” said McCombs, who took to Facebook to report his concerns.

Steve Eck, who was Clinton’s precinct captain for Knoxville No. 3, confirmed: “Somebody transposed those numbers.”

Eck, a 61-year-old nurse anesthesiologist, said the problem was reported to party officials.
 
http://www.desmoinesregister.com/st...nces-when-sanders-shorted-delegates/79902080/

Keane Schwarz is certain he knows the outcome of the vote in his precinct: He was the lone caucusgoer in Woodbury County No. 43.

But the Iowa Democratic Party's final results state that Hillary Clinton won one county delegate and Bernie Sanders received zero.

"I voted for Bernie," Schwarz, 36, of Oto, told The Des Moines Register. “It was really suspicious … I’m actually pretty irate about it.”

Some complaints that Iowa Democrats have shared with the Register about discrepancies in caucus results appear to be valid. Others stem from confusion over how the math-heavy delegate-awarding system works in the Democrats' caucus process.

Party officials on Friday night were still reviewing reports and correcting errors and hadn’t yet shared candidates' updated totals of state delegate equivalents, which determine the winner of the caucuses.

Sanders’ backers are more likely than Clinton’s to think the political system is rigged, polling has found. So it might not come as a surprise, especially since he lost by a hairsbreadth, that some think the Democratic caucus system is rigged. It also doesn't help the optics that the state party chairwoman drove around for years in a car with “HRC2016” license plates.

Several caucusgoers told the Register they thought Sanders had been shorted county delegates, including in Knoxville No. 3.

Molly Tedesco sports patriotic colors at Senator Marco Rubio's campaign party in the Iowa Ballroom at the Marriott in downtown Des Moines, Monday, Feb. 1, 2016. Rachel Mummey/The Register
A total of 110 people were present for the final vote, and the count was 58 people for Sanders and 52 people for Clinton — which amounted to five county delegates for Sanders and four for Clinton, said Lonnie McCombs, a 59-year-old Knoxville Democrat who is retired from careers in the military and in manufacturing,

“That’s how it was recorded,” said McCombs, a Sanders backer.

But when the Knoxville Journal Express newspaper posted the Democratic Party’s official results, it showed Knoxville No. 3 results as Clinton with five county delegates and Sanders with four.

“It cost Bernie a (county) delegate,” said McCombs, who took to Facebook to report his concerns.

Steve Eck, who was Clinton’s precinct captain for Knoxville No. 3, confirmed: “Somebody transposed those numbers.”

Eck, a 61-year-old nurse anesthesiologist, said the problem was reported to party officials.
This is not surprising at all. Who actually supports her? Only those looking for a kickback. There is so little excitement for her it wouldn't surprise me if her actual vote % was less than 40%.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Herkmeister
Why even waste time with facts? NO GOOD DEMOCRAT GIVES A RATS ASS ABOUT FACTS!!!!

But they're feeling warm and fuzzy that Hill won!!

Facts don't matter. The means to the end don't matter. Only the end. Hell yes the bitch cheated. So did TrusTED.
 
This is not surprising at all. Who actually supports her? Only those looking for a kickback. There is so little excitement for her it wouldn't surprise me if her actual vote % was less than 40%.

My district count was 110 Clinton to 67 Sanders...10 delegates to 6 I believe so she does have some support at least in my area.
 
205_174999.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: shank hawk
The Clintons must have learned a lot about stealing elections..............from their good friends in the Bush klan. :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: moral_victory
I'd like to know what the actually vote numbers were. I know when I caucused in 2008 it was for John Edwards. We were barely viable in my precincts,but when it was all said and done it ended with Clinton - 2, Obama - 1, Edwards - 1 in delegates. Even though we maybe had 20% of the votes after the second time. If it was popular vote my guess is it would have been more like Clinton 55%, Obama 25-30%, Edwards 15%-20% in my precinct in 2008.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT