Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
As a player/coach combination? I'd say yes. I think Brady hangs them up after the end of this season.Watching the KC vs NE game, is this the year we can finally say that Bill and Tom are done?
They are 10-2
Those rare times Brady has gone down his backup has been better than he is. Brady is superhuman but has to quit soon. I have no doubt Darth Vader will keep the Patriots machine rolling after Tommy retires.
They are 10-2
That's only because the AFC is weak top to bottom this year. They'd be 5th or 6th best in the NFC.10-3 after today and "look" like the 3rd best team in the AFC.
Lol, no.Those rare times Brady has gone down his backup has been better than he is.
10-3 after today and "look" like the 3rd best team in the AFC.
Lol, no.
Bill has a great system. But your claim that “those rare times Brady has gone down his backup has been better than he is” is just plain false.Yes. Bill has a great system. Plug and play. Any QB with half-decent skills would thrive in that organization.
Bill has a great system. But your claim that “those rare times Brady has gone down his backup has been better than he is” is just plain false.
The Patriots are 217-62 (.807) in regular season games with Brady as their starter. They are 13-6 (.684) without him.Anecdotal, but I remember many games when Brady was out and everyone was thinking NE would go down and the backup carved 'em up.
They are 10-2
Garropalo
He started two games. And one of them was against your Dolphins. You’re just pissed that he beat you.That's who I was thinking of. His stats were better than Brady's.
He started two games. And one of them was against your Dolphins. You’re just pissed that he beat you.
This thread is aging well. These bastard will probably score and go for 2.
A lot of QBs do that.He carved us up like a Sunday chicken dinner.
A lot of QBs do that.
The Patriots beat you in Foxboro without Brady, 31-24. They beat you later that year in Miami with Brady, 35-14.Tom Brady has historically had a tougher time playing at Miami than away at most other opponents. We're kinda used to playing tough against them at home. Not that day with Brady out.
The Patriots beat you in Foxboro without Brady, 31-24. They beat you later that year in Miami with Brady, 35-14.
You got any anecdotes that actually align with reality?
The Patriots beat you in Foxboro without Brady, 31-24. They beat you later that year in Miami with Brady, 35-14.
You got any anecdotes that actually align with reality?
Yeah, be he also said Garropalo carved them up in Miami. Garropalo played against Miami in Foxboro. Brady carved them up in Miami that year.Brady is 7-10 in Miami. He said historically.
Yeah, be he also said Garropalo carved them up in Miami. Garropalo played against Miami in Foxboro. Brady carved them up in Miami that year.
Well, I guess that’s good enough for me. Jimmy Garoppolo, who is one of the best QBs in the league, impressed you one time when he filled in for Brady, therefore it’s reasonable to conclude the Patriots are better without Brady.Whatever. Garropolo really impressed me.
I called it last week, Nate Stanley will be drafted by the Pats take over the mantle for Brady
Are those numbers correct? I knew they were good but I didn’t think they had a .800 winning markThe Patriots are 217-62 (.807) in regular season games with Brady as their starter. They are 13-6 (.684) without him.
He has missed extended time twice. In 2008 he suffered a season-ending knee injury in the first game. Matt Cassel took over and went 10-5 as the starter. It was the only time since Brady’s second season in 2002 that the Patriots missed the playoffs.
In 2016 he was suspended the first four games of the season for Deflategate. With Garropalo and Brissett filling in, the Patriots were 3-1. But the one loss was a 16-0 shutout by the Bills. When Brady came back, the Patriots went 11-1 to finish 14-2 and went on to win the Super Bowl.
My facts trump your anecdotal evidence.
I must have mis-typed a number when I plugged them into my calculator app. It’s actually a 0.778 winning percentage. After today’s loss it’s now 0.775.Are those numbers correct? I knew they were good but I didn’t think they had a .800 winning mark