I found this just nowsee the first paragraph immediately after the criteria)
From the 2016 NCAA DI Wrestling Committee Annual Report:
2. Selection and Seeding.
The additional coaches ranking that was added in 2015
following conference/qualifying tournaments proved valuable
to the committee. The committee recommended that the
coaches ranking criteria priority be increased to 15 percent of
the selection and seeding formula and that the number of
matches be eliminated as a selection and seeding criteria.
The committee will use the following modified weighted
criteria formula to select at-large wrestlers.
Criteria Weighted Percentage
Head-to-head 25%
Quality wins 20%
Common opponents 10%
RPI 10%
Qualifying placement 10%
Coaches rank 15%
Win percentage 10%
For 2016, the committee recommends that the qualifying
tournament placement selection and seeding criteria only be
awarded to wrestlers who earn a pre-allocated spot in their
respective conference tournament. This puts more emphasis
on the conference tournaments, rewarding conference
champions and wrestlers that place within the earned allocated
spots.
The definition of a quality win will remain the same.
However, a tiered structure will be added to the formula that
considers the strength of the quality wins and not simply the
number of quality wins. This will provide a better picture of
the full body of work
From the 2016 NCAA DI Wrestling Committee Annual Report:
2. Selection and Seeding.
The additional coaches ranking that was added in 2015
following conference/qualifying tournaments proved valuable
to the committee. The committee recommended that the
coaches ranking criteria priority be increased to 15 percent of
the selection and seeding formula and that the number of
matches be eliminated as a selection and seeding criteria.
The committee will use the following modified weighted
criteria formula to select at-large wrestlers.
Criteria Weighted Percentage
Head-to-head 25%
Quality wins 20%
Common opponents 10%
RPI 10%
Qualifying placement 10%
Coaches rank 15%
Win percentage 10%
For 2016, the committee recommends that the qualifying
tournament placement selection and seeding criteria only be
awarded to wrestlers who earn a pre-allocated spot in their
respective conference tournament. This puts more emphasis
on the conference tournaments, rewarding conference
champions and wrestlers that place within the earned allocated
spots.
The definition of a quality win will remain the same.
However, a tiered structure will be added to the formula that
considers the strength of the quality wins and not simply the
number of quality wins. This will provide a better picture of
the full body of work