Oh that doesnt matter. Pro family God fearing constitutuionalist Christians are held to a different standard.How many years of federal court experience did Elena Kagan have?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh that doesnt matter. Pro family God fearing constitutuionalist Christians are held to a different standard.How many years of federal court experience did Elena Kagan have?
25 years or so ago, Conservative Evangelicals would have freaked out over a CATHOLIC Cult member being appointed to the supreme court.
Then and now they will claim that GOD is leading them in their conclusions.
8 working days, the FBI and the Senate will have to,
- FBI conducts background check
- Senate conducts own background check
- Obtain and read over 100 7th District opinions written by her
- Plan strategy and line of questioning for hearings
- Setup hearings
- Hold hearings
- Allot time for Senators to decide
- Schedule vote
- Hold vote
25 years or so ago, Conservative Evangelicals would have freaked out over a CATHOLIC Cult member being appointed to the supreme court.
Then and now they will claim that GOD is leading them in their conclusions.
Oh, that doesn't matter. Pro-family, God-fearing, corporatists, and Christians are held to a different standard.
This sounds about right.In 8 working days, they will actually do the following
- Conduct committee hearing with no questions allowed
- Schedule vote
- Hold vote
Great a Federalist Society judge who is also a zealot. We are so lost.
Nah, let them appoint her. Then pack the court. She can have fun voting in the minority after Biden wins and the Dems take the Senate.
So we should kill the unborn children rather than have a single parent family ? I dont think you are fit to decide who lives and dies.The pro-family and god-fearing portions will work against each other. As anti-choice will create a good deal more single parent families.
We should also probably stop the constitutionalist charade. It is just an exercise in virtue signalling and dishonesty.
There are, without a doubt, certain types of Christians (and other religious factions) that deserve extra scrutiny.
So we should kill the unborn children rather than have a single parent family ? I dont think you are fit to decide who lives and dies.
The constitution is not a charade. We dont have a country without it.
Christians dont deserve more scrutiny unless you are a bigot.
I was essential saying your people don't care about it, you use it as a false shield.
Speaking as someone who wants Trump to lose but who probably agrees with Barrett on more issues than not, I hope the left focuses on substance and not on stupid stuff like tearing down her religious beliefs.
I'm sure the Vatican approves. The irony is way back when, the 80's, WAPs hated catholics. Now they are conservative bum chums.
the objectives of Republicans is to stick it to the Democrats/Libs.. That is their entire movement. They used to pretend to be conservatives, but they have shown that really isn't the case. Really it is the fault of the intellectuals on the right. They used to think they could keep the morons pinned in, use them for votes and advanced their beliefs.. they were wrong, the morons took over the party and the intellectuals have mostly fled.
uNBoRn CHildREn!!!
Perhaps, my statement was too nuanced for you on the constitution. No shock, to be honest. I was essential saying your people don't care about it, you use it as a false shield.
How about if she was part of Westboro. Does that deserve more scrutiny? How about part of the Islamic State? The Southern Baptist branches that get bit by venomous snakes? People that go into seizures for the Lord?
She just went through a confirmation a few years ago. You're acting like nothing is known about her and she has never been vetted.In 8 working days, the FBI and the Senate will have to,
The corner cutting will be insane to get all of this done.
- FBI conducts background check
- Senate conducts own background check
- Obtain and read over 100 7th District opinions written by her
- Plan strategy and line of questioning for hearings
- Setup hearings
- Hold hearings
- Allot time for Senators to decide
- Schedule vote
- Hold vote
How many years of federal court experience did Elena Kagan have?
Didn't Obama nominate Garland in an election year? Didn't most Dems support a vote in the Senate? Aren't you now criticizing the Senate for not voting in 2016?the hypocrisy is just incredible, whether it is Trump, McConnell or others, there is always a tweet saved in time that will show what repulsive and hypocritical people we are dealing with in the White House and Senate, they will do ANYTHING to maintain and increase their power and won't flinch for a split second if they have to trample on american citizens or the democracy of the United States formed over two centuries.
What does her former confirmation have to do with this? All the other SCOTUS justices were confirmed to lower nominations prior to their higher nomination. They still took an average of 67 days to get confirmed. You're only proving my point that the plan is to cut corners.She just went through a confirmation a few years ago. You're acting like nothing is known about her and she has never been vetted.
Didn't Obama nominate Garland in an election year? Didn't most Dems support a vote in the Senate? Aren't you now criticizing the Senate for not voting in 2016?
Kagan's confirmation also took 88 days, so any questions if her suitability had more than ample time to be answered.She wasn’t allowed a vote. She was also the Dean of Harvard Law School. She was certainly far more successful as an academic.
Remember when Trump touted that Gorsuch and Kavanaugh went to Yale, and said he liked people who went to the best schools?
And as a desperate attempt to fix Trump's problems with women voters.Serious question, does anybody believe she was nominated for any reason other than her religious convictions?
I do t k ow what’s worse. Menace calling this woman mentally ill or all the people who liked it. It really is something to see what Trump has done to some mentally weak people.So Trumpian. As is her cult membership. This woman is mentally ill...
Amy Coney Barrett purposely hid her membership in religious group
Amy Coney Barrett and her husband Jesse are members of People of Praise, a small group that teaches that wives have to obey their husbands in all things.www.dailymail.co.uk
Another one of the crazies got out. YikesSo it’s the cute little handmaiden? I’m not surprised. She’ll be good breeding stock in our theocratic post apocalyptic society. She knows her place.
So it’s the cute little handmaiden? I’m not surprised. She’ll be good breeding stock in our theocratic post apocalyptic society. She knows her place.
Serious question, does anybody believe she was nominated for any reason other than her religious convictions?
I remember a time when conservative Christians, especially Baptists, thought that Catholics were of the devil. Maybe over 25 years ago, but definitely in my adult lifetime. I did live in N. Carolina in the 70s and 80s, so I saw it.You realize Scalia and Kennedy were both appointed to the Supreme Court in the late 80’s right?
Years ago it would have been conservative Christians. I lived in N. Carolina in the 70s and 80s and knew plenty of Baptists who thought Catholics were of the devil.meaningless post.
The only people attacking the nominee for her religous beliefs are Leftist bigots.
Are you a bot?Years ago it would have been conservative Christians. I lived in N. Carolina in the 70s and 80s and knew plenty of Baptists who thought Catholics were of the devil.
Liberals who are worried about her are worried that she will put her oath to her cult above her oath to the constitution.
Years ago it would have been conservative Christians. I lived in N. Carolina in the 70s and 80s and knew plenty of Baptists who thought Catholics were of the devil.
Liberals who are worried about her are worried that she will put her faithfulness to the constitution above radical socialism.