That stood out to me as well. LC asked a question, they paused off camera, came back, had her re-ask the question, clarified "legally or morally" she said "both" and I THINK* he decided it was all mickey mouse at thst point and just shut down and started saying "fifth".
Because Flynn is working for Putin.
Still waiting on their latest talking point memo.
How do you think that the answer to the question do you believe in the transfer of power legally would be different than the answer to the question do you believe in the transfer of power morally is different? If so why?
I think* he viewed the question as a "gotcha" when she brought the moral angle in. He is a general, he is there for the facts not the feelings. I'm speculating based off his response and actions.
Yeah.... and then 2 hours later he got on camera and told them to go home.
Isn't the peaceful transfer of power an vital part of the United States of America? Legally it is the law so the answer is yes. I assume you think the speculation would be morally. Give me an example where you would disagree with the transfer of power morally.
They were 2 different questions. By the time she asked the transfer of power question he had already gone into "this is Mickey mouse bullshit" mode. Basically the PC version of "I'm not going to legitimize that question with an answer".
Flynn is a Qanon piece of shit moron by the way.
I don't think that's what happened because it was a legal strategy given to him from his lawyer. Remember, they had a minute and a half conference before they answered the question. The lawyer told him to respond with the 5th. If he were just getting tired of the questions and decided to treat it as a joke he would not have had to talk to his lawyer.
O I certainly agree the lawyer likely said something like "you dont have to answer any of these" off camera.
You'll have to excuse me for not being up to snuff on Qanon shit but isn't the idea he is a "qanon piece of shit" or a "Russian asset" more qanon-esque than the possibility he was just an important guy who thought his time was being wasted?
I think he wanted to answer no to both legally and morally. His lawyer told him he'd better off taking the fifth than answering no.
Agree....the lack security at the capitol needs a deep dive. Hardly touched on....
Looks like they decided the threats weren't credible and they were wrong. What more do you want?
January 6th Intelligence Failure Timeline
The most comprehensive timeline of the intelligence failure preceding the January 6th attack on the US Capitol.www.justsecurity.org
Ample opportunity to beef up security....seems like a no brainer to me.
There is also the culture at the time. How would it have looked, and how would it have provoked, if one side was left to take over city blocks for months but as soon as anyone showed up at the capitol there was immediately armed guards.
She didn't bring up morality - they did. Not surprised you're trying to defend this piece of shit either.
Jesus dude, they asked her to clarify the question as a moral or legal question and she said "both". In my opinion, at that point, Flynn realized this was all mickey mouse because what he thinks is morale doesn't mean shit its a talking point. You argue some of the dumbest shit.
How about a gd explanation? Is that asking too much or are we just going with the dumbass story of edited clips provided by idiots with an agenda?
Exactly - they brought it up and she responded. JFC.
I think Flynn was merely asking for a Fifth of Jack Daniels or something, to help drown his sorrows.
They asked her to clarify her position and when she did they realized it was a mickey mouse question. I'm of thr belief at that point he realized this was a "gotcha" game and shut down, consecutively pleading the 5th.
FFS - as usual, you are wrong in saying she brought it up but refuse to admit it. She didn't bring up morality, they did.
Because Trump isn't around to pardon him this time. He has criminal exposure.
Why does this myth keep being perpetuated? There were barriers up. There were lots of cops across the Capitol grounds. The insurrectionists were organized. If you do a deep dive on what happened that day, say with what the NY Times put together, or the video the 1/6 Committee assembled, you can see how the Proud Boys / Oath Keepers worked in tandem to probe the various entrances, and work to overwhelm the cops. There were pitched battles on each level the cops tried to defend.
Not a myth….look at the videos it’s jarring how few capital police were there.
Myth
Keep peeling the layers and overturning the rocks. People that are afraid to get caught up in this as collateral damage are going to start talking.
I think his lawyer told him it was a gateway question. for example:
