God ****ing damn it. Frans fault
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Agreed. Expected this to be Ulis and not Toussaint. Not sure I understand working your way to a starting position for 3 years and then leaving when it's finally in your lap, but JT was probably capped at 25 mins per game next year so can understand if he wants more.It’s Fran’s fault that Joe doesn’t want to compete for the wide open PG spot? Ok.
Fans everywhere had better get used to temporary rosters. Teams are going to look different year over year.
I don’t think it’s good for CBB but overall but it’s beneficial to individual players.
Probably because ultra talented connor mccaffrey is coming back to take minutes of players who actually should be playing big ten basketballAgreed. Expected this to be Ulis and not Toussaint. Not sure I understand working your way to a starting position for 3 years and then leaving when it's finally in your lap, but JT was probably capped at 25 mins per game next year so can understand if he wants more.
Sure hope the recruits this fall can step in quickly and capably.
A great perimeter defender who can beat people off the dribble. Give me a freakin break.Joe, like Bohannon, is a one dimensional player. Just at the other end of the court. His specialty is D, which as we all know is secondary to offense for Fran. That’s why he didn’t play more minutes. Connor didn’t cut into Joe’s minutes, Jordan did. Now that Jordan’s gone….well kind of an odd move imo but it goes back to Fran emphasizing O over D. Best of luck to Joe.
Connor was very rarely taking minutes from JT.Probably because ultra talented connor mccaffrey is coming back to take minutes of players who actually should be playing big ten basketball
I'm triggggggered. Just let me have this, I'll get over itStay unhinged, Bro.
Did Fran try much Perkins and Toussaint this year? The reason I say this, is because I believe Perkins was just as much of a reason that Iowa finished well, rather than Bohannon.um… love Joe T he’s a hell of a hawk and his attitude was unreal especially in this day and age but Iowa got better when he went to the bench.
I'm hoping Bowen can do both of those and shoot effectively.A great perimeter defender who can beat people off the dribble. Give me a freakin break.
Joe T was never given a fair shake. He had the shortest leash I’ve ever seen. That anxiety no doubt carried over into his play on the court, as he often tried to do too much.Joe, like Bohannon, is a one dimensional player. Just at the other end of the court. His specialty is D, which as we all know is secondary to offense for Fran. That’s why he didn’t play more minutes. Connor didn’t cut into Joe’s minutes, Jordan did. Now that Jordan’s gone….well kind of an odd move imo but it goes back to Fran emphasizing O over D. Best of luck to Joe.
This is a good point. To get to that “next level” it’s essential that your PG can do it all. Like I said previously, our PG play was flawed because they were all one dimensional.I'm hoping Bowen can do both of those and shoot effectively.
Who?Must mean the Brown kid coming in next year is pretty good
We may disagree on the why but Joe T just never fully developed. I hope he kills it wherever he lands.Joe T was never given a fair shake. He had the shortest leash I’ve ever seen. That anxiety no doubt carried over into his play on the court, as he often tried to do too much.
I’m surprised Joe didn’t leave after last year, tbh. I don’t know that this is a bad thing for Iowa basketball, though, as it should pave the way for this Bowen we’ve heard so much about to earn his way into meaningful minutes.
This is really not a surprise after losing his starting spot. Neither would Connor be running the point next year. Good luck Joe!
Yep. There were a lot of things I liked about Joe, but he didn’t move the needle in comparison to other Fran pgs. And that’s really where we’re still at in the Fran era: waiting on a difference maker at pg.This is a good point. To get to that “next level” it’s essential that your PG can do it all. Like I said previously, our PG play was flawed because they were all one dimensional.
💯Yep. There were a lot of things I liked about Joe, but he didn’t move the needle in comparison to other Fran pgs. And that’s really where we’re still at in the Fran era: waiting on a difference maker at pg.
um… love Joe T he’s a hell of a hawk and his attitude was unreal especially in this day and age but Iowa got better when he went to the bench.
What makes you think the starting position was his for the taking?Agreed. Expected this to be Ulis and not Toussaint. Not sure I understand working your way to a starting position for 3 years and then leaving when it's finally in your lap, but JT was probably capped at 25 mins per game next year so can understand if he wants more.
Sure hope the recruits this fall can step in quickly and capably.
I can only assume he's referring to next year.Connor was very rarely taking minutes from JT.
I don’t think there’s much of a why to disagree on. Joe T was flashy and quick, but he was a turnover liability and a below average shooter. What he did excel at is defense, which I felt separated him from the other pg options Iowa had.We may disagree on the why but Joe T just never fully developed. I hope he kills it wherever he lands.
The roster composition next season and the fact he has started many games in his career to date.What makes you think the starting position was his for the taking?
And lost his starting point guard position for the second time. If I were Joe I wouldn't have any confidence that I'd be starting especially if Connor's coming back.The roster composition next season and the fact he has started many games in his career to date.