Juan Williams Claims "Nothing There"
- Thread starter IowaHawkeyeFBnBB4Life
- Start date
You really ought to get out and explore your world more, IowaHawk. If Juan is as political as you can get, you haven't exposed yourself to much.
This remark is ALMOST too stupid to refute! Just when I think you can't get any more ridiculous... you do. Since Obama was elected, the cons have become more hateful, more resentful, and more obstructive than at any time in my life.
Since you watch Fox Entertainment Network. with the likes of Hannity/Rove/Beck and others, your interpretation of "partisan" means little.
Stick to those polls you so enjoy posting and leave the thoughtful discussion to the adults.
You do realize, or perhaps you don't, the ratio of Cons to Libs on that program is 4 to 1?
You can't be that naïve!
-Hannity is ok
-Not a fan of Rove
-Definitely not a fan of Beck
I prefer to listen to Breitbart News Daily and the Wilkow Majority.
A
anon_01irjibf16qqj
Guest
Breitbart News Daily is one of the better radio shows out there. Although it was better when Bannon was hosting.
How can anyone of normal mentality think even remotely that Glenn Beck is anything but fringe nut-job? The guy is a creep! God......save us from ourselves!
I wonder what time Mr. Williams made this statement? The same day that the documents were released.... 58 pages.... how did he pore over all that so quickly and determine that there was nothing there?
Yep. Alan Coombs used to be that guy when they had him paired up with Hannity. Once Hannity kept losing all the discussions, they had to reduce the Dem's viewpoint so he lost air time.
When I first started watching Fox, they were a bit more objective. But that was when Bush was still President. Once Obama got elected... they went into "full anti-Dem mode".
It's not a big deal any more because I know what to expect when I view that network. There are only a few somewhat objective talking heads that remain on the broadcasts and none of those get the prime time slots.
BTW: Since the revelations about Roger Ailes, I always wonder which of the female on-air personalities got to where they are by banging him?
A
anon_01irjibf16qqj
Guest
(((DeanObeidallah))) @Deanofcomedy 8h8 hours ago
This election involves letter "C" - C for Hillary's confidential emails and C for Trump's rental applications that stood for colored peeps
This election involves letter "C" - C for Hillary's confidential emails and C for Trump's rental applications that stood for colored peeps
On a side note- The story of Patty Anne Brown
Back in the day She had implants even larger than this pic. She was the morning host and was always dressed in the standard attire that Ailes demanded. Well, one morning they were doing an outside exercise segment and she was in a super tight white t shirt. As the training expert asked her to get down on the ground to do an exercise alongside him she refused and the dude on air says "I was told you were going to do this". After that segment Brown disappeared for a loooong time and when she reappeared it was to do off studio small segments at all hours of the day AND the implants were gone. I believe she still works at the network.
Does everyone realize that the only reason people like Juan Williams, or "contributors" as they say, are invited on these programs is because they're partisan? When everyone agrees, debate isn't entertaining, and quickly swings all participants toward the wings.
Having a strong opinion gets these people invited back (they need the money), not whether their statements are well-balanced or fair.
Having a strong opinion gets these people invited back (they need the money), not whether their statements are well-balanced or fair.
Cowardly ... as in it's cowardly and Stolen Valor to claim to have come under enemy sniper fire when you didn't?
