Ken Starr suggests Sondland’s testimony could prompt GOP to ask Trump to resign
- Thread starter Kenneth Griffin
- Start date
-
- Tags
- trad sucks
Holy shit! Sondland's testimony is a BIG deal!
If Trump didn't have a heart attack over the weekend, he most likely did when he saw Sondland's testimony! Resign and blame it on health issues! This may have been Trump's reason for visiting Walter Reed Hospital. Giuliani probably came up with that idea!
The Wicked Witch is shriveling up!
If Trump didn't have a heart attack over the weekend, he most likely did when he saw Sondland's testimony! Resign and blame it on health issues! This may have been Trump's reason for visiting Walter Reed Hospital. Giuliani probably came up with that idea!
The Wicked Witch is shriveling up!
yes this testimony of "I don't know... don't recall... only if you say so..." is really worrisome to trump.
wasn't ken starr president of baylor while they let the basketball players murder folks and the football players rape folks?
I don't think he got to Baylor yet when they were murdering people but he was there while there was raping and other crap going on.
There is quite literally no defense left other than it's not a crime if the president does it. There are a number of GOP senators who don't want to parrot that line. They can pressure Moscow Mitch. I went from "no way in hell do they convict" to "maybe...just maybe..."
I was at the gym earlier and they have several TVs mounted to the wall, each tuned in to different news broadcasts. Pretty much all of them had headlines that read: "Sonderland Testifies to Quid Pro Quo" or something like that.
Then there were the Fox News headlines, most of them obscure, but one read: "Sonderland Testifies No Quid Pro Quo from Trump," or something like that.
So, who's correct? We don't just have nuanced or slanted facts anymore. We have two completely different realities.
Then there were the Fox News headlines, most of them obscure, but one read: "Sonderland Testifies No Quid Pro Quo from Trump," or something like that.
So, who's correct? We don't just have nuanced or slanted facts anymore. We have two completely different realities.
Well if the president says it, it must be true.
So Trump gets wind that this crime is about to break and suddenly says in a weirdly specific way that there was no quid pro quo. And there are some who believe that?
Surprised to see you pop your head up on this day that will live in infamy. Removal from office or not, its a BAD day for Republussians.
A lot of collusion and covering up, too. Maybe the WH should release all the documents and allow people to testify? That might clear things up.
What’s it like going from being a proud Republican to seeing Devin Nunes and Jim Jordan as your first string out there defending a criminal organization?
The joy this is bringing really is something. In the end if Trump gets removed or resigns your life will not be different one bit.
We will at least have a (wo)man in the White House who is fitting of the office. Perhaps even Pence, but it looks like he's being implicated as well.
If you bribe someone, you don’t mitigate it saying “it’s not a bribe.”
You understand that, don’t you?
There is a good chance that the world becomes more secure, my air and water probably get cleaner, and dignity is restored to the Executive Branch which should affect all Americans on some level.
Nunes gives the Orange Turd a run for the dumbest person on earth. Wow!
Catching the Son of Sam didn't change me life even a tiny bit. I was still happy about it.
His 23 page opening statement was bad for Trump. Things turned around when he got questioned. The exchange with Jim Jordan on why he left out the “Trump said be quid pro quo” was remarkable. He said he ran out of room. Wtf kind of answer is that.
the Ken Starr comments came before the cross examination
the Ken Starr comments came before the cross examination
Yep, AFTER he was told of the whistleblower complaint. No way Trump knew what quid pro quo was prior to this...
Hey hawkland14, how does that new asshole you just got feel?
Trump said no quid pro quo after the whistleblower had blown his whistle. It's meaningless.
sure but they didn’t understand the coded language like LC
Trump not asking for a quid quo pro, is like him asking someone to go into a bank with a gun and ask for the money, but saying he doesn’t want them to rob a bank. Just saying you don’t want it, does t mean you didn’t do it.
MPs demand Zelensky, Trump investigate suspicion of U.S.-Ukraine corruption involving $7.4 bln
KYIV. Nov 20 (Interfax-Ukraine) – Ukrainian members of parliament have demanded the presidents of Ukraine and the United States, Volodymyr Zelensky and Donald Trump, investigate suspicions of the legalization of $7.4 billion by the "family" of ex-President Viktor Yanukovych through the American investment fund Franklin Templeton Investments, which they said has ties to the U.S. Democratic Party.
At a press conference at the Interfax-Ukraine agency on Wednesday, MP Andriy Derkach announced that deputies have received new materials from investigative journalists about international corruption and the participation of Ukrainian officials in it.
"Last week, November 14, the Prosecutor General's Office (PGO), unnoticed by the media, announced a new suspicion to the notorious owner of Burisma, ex-Ecology Minister Zlochevsky. According to the suspicion, the Yanukovych family is suspected, in particular, with legalizing (laundering) of criminally obtained income through Franklin Templeton Investments, an investment fund carrying out purchases of external government loan bonds totaling $7.4 billion," Derkach said.
https://en.interfax.com.ua/news/press-conference/625831.html
What happens when the PUBLIC discovers the TRUTH [magnitude] re: [D] party corruption?
What happens when the PUBLIC discovers the TRUTH re: [FAKE NEWS] coordination w: [D] party to conceal, shelter, and protect those criminally responsible?
Define 'Projection'.
THE GREAT AWAKENING
SHEEP NO MORE
KYIV. Nov 20 (Interfax-Ukraine) – Ukrainian members of parliament have demanded the presidents of Ukraine and the United States, Volodymyr Zelensky and Donald Trump, investigate suspicions of the legalization of $7.4 billion by the "family" of ex-President Viktor Yanukovych through the American investment fund Franklin Templeton Investments, which they said has ties to the U.S. Democratic Party.
At a press conference at the Interfax-Ukraine agency on Wednesday, MP Andriy Derkach announced that deputies have received new materials from investigative journalists about international corruption and the participation of Ukrainian officials in it.
"Last week, November 14, the Prosecutor General's Office (PGO), unnoticed by the media, announced a new suspicion to the notorious owner of Burisma, ex-Ecology Minister Zlochevsky. According to the suspicion, the Yanukovych family is suspected, in particular, with legalizing (laundering) of criminally obtained income through Franklin Templeton Investments, an investment fund carrying out purchases of external government loan bonds totaling $7.4 billion," Derkach said.
https://en.interfax.com.ua/news/press-conference/625831.html
What happens when the PUBLIC discovers the TRUTH [magnitude] re: [D] party corruption?
What happens when the PUBLIC discovers the TRUTH re: [FAKE NEWS] coordination w: [D] party to conceal, shelter, and protect those criminally responsible?
Define 'Projection'.
THE GREAT AWAKENING
SHEEP NO MORE
