Put on your tinfoil hats, conservatives, more crazy at link for you to lap up.
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/09/rush-limbaugh-mars-leftist-plot-214179
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/09/rush-limbaugh-mars-leftist-plot-214179
Oh God... Rush is going crazy isn't he? It won't be long before he goes off the grid.
Put on your tinfoil hats, conservatives, more crazy at link for you to lap up.
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/09/rush-limbaugh-mars-leftist-plot-214179
Or they could simply say that Mars has global warming going on, and yet there are no humans there. That's where I would start.You cons are missing a big opportunity. Mars needs global warming. If anyone was going to use Mars as a talking point it should be a denier. If humans are ever going to live on Mars in numbers it will be because we figure out how to control Global Warming and replicate it on Mars.
We would be interested if that had discovered oil instead of water.You cons are missing a big opportunity. Mars needs global warming. If anyone was going to use Mars as a talking point it should be a denier. If humans are ever going to live on Mars in numbers it will be because we figure out how to control Global Warming and replicate it on Mars.
Is that true that Mars has GW? I think that's a point not yet in evidence.Or they could simply say that Mars has global warming going on, and yet there are no humans there. That's where I would start.
Well the ice is melting right? Isn't that what our main basis for GW is?Is that true that Mars has GW? I think that's a point not yet in evidence.
Fossil fuels on Mars would be a big deal for all of us.We would be interested if that had discovered oil instead of water.
No.Well the ice is melting right? Isn't that what our main basis for GW is?
Fossil fuels on Mars would be a big deal for all of us.
Sure it is. Let's say I ask you "Natural, how can we be absolutely positive that the temperatures have and are rising?" The first thing most would do, is show me a picture of the polar ice caps. See?
Would we use more fossil fuels getting there then the actual amount of fossil fuels we would bring back?Fossil fuels on Mars would be a big deal for all of us.
At least we would not have to argue over a pipeline.Fossil fuels on Mars would be a big deal for all of us.
No, I'd show you the temperatures taken over time. Ice melts even in the winter. Melting ice is proof that ice melts.Sure it is. Let's say I ask you "Natural, how can we be absolutely positive that the temperatures have and are rising?" The first thing most would do, is show me a picture of the polar ice caps. See?
I wouldn't think bringing them back would be smart. But burning them there to thicken the atmosphere and terraform the planet would be fun to contemplate.Would we use more fossil fuels getting there then the actual amount of fossil fuels we would bring back?
Isn't that what it's called? What do you call it? Bubbling crude, black gold, Texas tea?Just the fact that you are calling the oil fossil fuels.....
people with the agenda of acting like it's a limited resource call it "fossil fuels", they do that to make people think we gotta wait thousands of years to let the fossils break down, those of us who know it is not limited and in fact a re-plenishing resource, like the blood of the earth, people like me who listen to Lindsay Williams, we call it oil. It's all semantics like the "climate change" thing which used to be global warming.Isn't that what it's called? What do you call it? Bubbling crude, black gold, Texas tea?
people with the agenda of acting like it's a limited resource call it "fossil fuels", they do that to make people think we gotta wait thousands of years to let the fossils break down, those of us who know it is not limited and in fact a re-plenishing resource, like the blood of the earth, people like me who listen to Lindsay Williams, we call it oil. It's all semantics like the "climate change" thing which used to be global warming.
Interesting. I've never heard oil referred to as a replenishing source. Tell me more.
people with the agenda of acting like it's a limited resource call it "fossil fuels", they do that to make people think we gotta wait thousands of years to let the fossils break down, those of us who know it is not limited and in fact a re-plenishing resource, like the blood of the earth, people like me who listen to Lindsay Williams, we call it oil. It's all semantics like the "climate change" thing which used to be global warming.
I would totally expect the left to claim that somehow GW is causing the melt on Mars. We know the left, there are no limits to what they will believe.