I think the Oline aspect of this is particularly egregious. Iowa's line in 2021 was bad, and it was obviously so. And it was young, there has been a ton of attrition among the "senior" classes (2018 and 2019) that should have been the nucleus of the 2021 and 2022 teams. Despite this, Iowa made zero moves in the portal after the 2021 season to try and shore up the Oline. Add to that, we were losing our far-and-away best player on the line, Linderbaum. So the net effect going into 2022 was significantly negative. And that is on the coaches to not have addressed the issue before 2022.
Frankly, I'm not sure they've done much to expect things to be significantly better next season. Feth seems like a decent enough player, but I don't think he's anything more than a replacement-level B1G player. Which is still better than half our options, but rather telling. And I think there is a TON of wishcasting going on with regard to Parker. He's a D-2 player making a huge jump who had absolutely no P5 interest outside of UVA (as a resident of Virginia, I can assure this is not something to be celebrated). He's facing a steep learning curve, and he only has this next season to play since he only has 1 year of eligibility remaining.
I had mentioned at the old GIA site during the season that it didnt' look like the coaches had a plan or knew how to fix the Oline in 2023 and beyond other than throwing in Proctor immediately like we did with Wirfs and hope that others develop significantly. And they do not appear to have had a backup plan in place when they lost Proctor (I am not blaming the coaches for "losing" him). and I think they are sort of scrambling now. But it's a case of too little, too late for next year.