Part A. Is ranking the players using the ‘eye’ test. Who do you think the best players are in terms of ranking them by say,
1. Conference results. As they provide a consistent competitive standard and this is for the most part post Jobo so the remaining 8 will have similar consistent minutes played.
2. Let’s look at non ‘counting numbers’ as Garza gets the most minutes and shots so he will win all, and so on, so we can look at contributions over 40m to normalize the comparisons.
the poll is pretty easy, select the configuration that best ranks the players using the eye test, do so quickly, go with your gut, and try to do so without ‘cheating’ by looking at advanced sites, as that defeats the purpose of trusting your ‘gut’ and ‘eyes’
please feel free to share your thoughts on the key point or 3 that guided your decision making
1. Conference results. As they provide a consistent competitive standard and this is for the most part post Jobo so the remaining 8 will have similar consistent minutes played.
2. Let’s look at non ‘counting numbers’ as Garza gets the most minutes and shots so he will win all, and so on, so we can look at contributions over 40m to normalize the comparisons.
the poll is pretty easy, select the configuration that best ranks the players using the eye test, do so quickly, go with your gut, and try to do so without ‘cheating’ by looking at advanced sites, as that defeats the purpose of trusting your ‘gut’ and ‘eyes’
please feel free to share your thoughts on the key point or 3 that guided your decision making
Last edited: