Yes, I've complained about these before. But they continue to run, anyway.
Not only are the people obnoxious, but the arguments they made are based on the premise that their potential customers are morons.
All of the examples except one -- where the driver "taps the bumper" of another car -- are accidents in which the insured driver was not at fault. Any problems with insufficient coverage would be the fault of the other guy's policy.
Not only are the people obnoxious, but the arguments they made are based on the premise that their potential customers are morons.
All of the examples except one -- where the driver "taps the bumper" of another car -- are accidents in which the insured driver was not at fault. Any problems with insufficient coverage would be the fault of the other guy's policy.