Kirk 3.0This can't be, because the geniuses on this board say Ferentz always favors upperclassmen over younger players. What gives geniuses?
I guess KF changed after the last time 80% of fans knew which QB to start a full year before he did...This can't be, because the geniuses on this board say Ferentz always favors upperclassmen over younger players. What gives geniuses?
This can't be, because the geniuses on this board say Ferentz always favors upperclassmen over younger players. What gives geniuses?
We’ll always have Michigan
I'm cool with it. Creamer is an athletic guy and if he is hungry to improve and not have a complacent attitude great! Depth is a serious issue for sure. We will be seeing Roberts and DJ Johnson from swarm18 now if we weren't going to already. Seems like Manny may have lost his motivation to improve maybe had a baditude too.Rumor is Creamer has been standing out and OJ had been outplaying Rugamba. If all true, not terribly surprising, but definitely a big hit to the depth chart, again, IF true.
I think that game for him was a little overblown. Go back and watch the game and see that he was burned several times and the Michigan QB was inaccurate or their receiver dropped the pass. One was a sure TD and if it goes it would have likely been the game decider. Would the narrative have been the same after a loss getting burned?
Who cares didn’t happen. Huge int on the last drive. Like I said, we’ll always have Michigan
Fans care because he didn’t perform as well as many think. Yes, he made a key play or two, but also made numerous mistakes. He has the talent, but hasn’t taken the next step. Of course he could and it helps to have him with experience, but you also have to look at all things not just the good.Who cares didn’t happen. Huge int on the last drive. Like I said, we’ll always have Michigan
Rumor is Creamer has been standing out and OJ had been outplaying Rugamba. If all true, not terribly surprising, but definitely a big hit to the depth chart, again, IF true.
This is not possible....Jimbo=QB Guru...thus could not have been the QBs fault.I think that game for him was a little overblown. Go back and watch the game and see that he was burned several times and the Michigan QB was inaccurate or their receiver dropped the pass. One was a sure TD and if it goes it would have likely been the game decider. Would the narrative have been the same after a loss getting burned?
Rugamba saw Jackson pass him last year. Now, he's seen OJ and Hankins pass him. Given current rumor .... Creamer is ascending ... so maybe he passes him too.Rumor is Creamer has been standing out and OJ had been outplaying Rugamba. If all true, not terribly surprising, but definitely a big hit to the depth chart, again, IF true.
Sorry, my post assumed Hankins had already passed him and was locked into one of the starting spots.Hankins is probably also in the mix if I were to guess.
Better than that ... I'd imagine that he's a current favorite to win a starting spot too.Hankins is probably also in the mix if I were to guess.
This can't be, because the geniuses on this board say Ferentz always favors upperclassmen over younger players. What gives geniuses?
Just
Oh that actually Just depends on WHAT upperclassmen...
I'd swap OL and WR. We're not as deep as some think on the line, and a few guys still have some things to prove.Defensive Back is not a major concern.
Positions of concern in decending order based on quality, experience, depth, etc.
LB - Lots of new faces, ?????
WR - Some experience with Easley and Smith-Marsette, but quality is questionable
RB - Like what we saw from Young and IKM in limited carries. Depth is thin.
OL - Some experience but usually takes us 4+ games to gel
I agree. I thought people always upgraded his perceived level of play due to that circus interception. I never thought he looked great although there are much better football minds on here than myself . JMOI think that game for him was a little overblown. Go back and watch the game and see that he was burned several times and the Michigan QB was inaccurate or their receiver dropped the pass. One was a sure TD and if it goes it would have likely been the game decider. Would the narrative have been the same after a loss getting burned?
Quite true And1. Michigans QB took a beating in that game, and when he wasn't getting hit, he was missing guys deep. Credit to Manny for making a play on some poorly thrown balls, but your correct that plays were there to be made, and the QB wasn't able to capitalize on the opportunities.I think that game for him was a little overblown. Go back and watch the game and see that he was burned several times and the Michigan QB was inaccurate or their receiver dropped the pass. One was a sure TD and if it goes it would have likely been the game decider. Would the narrative have been the same after a loss getting burned?
Oh brother.....You mean, between the two QB's that are both in the NFL? I'ts probably a good idea that the coaches make the decisions and not 80% of the fans. LOLI guess KF changed after the last time 80% of fans knew which QB to start a full year before he did...
This can't be, because the geniuses on this board say Ferentz always favors upperclassmen over younger players. What gives geniuses?
Yes...between the two that are in the NFL, nice problem to have...one was told he would no longer be the starter, a move that coulda happened a dozen or so games earlier really...Oh brother.....You mean, between the two QB's that are both in the NFL? I'ts probably a good idea that the coaches make the decisions and not 80% of the fans. LOL