ADVERTISEMENT

Map shows where America's conservatives live

Does the article mention anything about Baltimore being a liberal paradise?

“Liberal Paradise” Up in Flames
Thomas DiLorenzo

Baltimore Sun columnist Thomas Schaller, a political science professor at the University of Maryland-Baltimore County, cheerfully heralded the state of Maryland as a “liberal paradise”in 2013. Maryland is indeed by far the most left-wing state in America, a veritable showcase of the “liberal” welfare state. It has huge populations of both government employees and welfare parasites; one of the most generous welfare systems of any state; its “public” schools have long been destroyed by belligerent teachers’ unions; is a very high-tax state; routinely wages political war on whatever is left of real capitalism — its politicians proudly boast that the regulation of business is more onerous than any other state, and usually exceeds even federal regulatory dictates; and coddles criminals, endlessly repeating the “liberal” mantra that criminals are not responsible for the crimes they commit, “society” is. And of course the “war on drugs” rages in inner-city Baltimore as much as anywhere, complete with ever-increasing police brutality with an increasingly militarized and federalized police force.

As in many other cities, in Baltimore the black family has been all-but-destroyed by the welfare state (See Losing Ground by Charles Murray for an explanation of how welfare eliminated the stigma that was once attached to abandoning one’s children). The Baltimore Sun reports that, for decades, at least 80% of all black children are born without a father being a part of their life, with white families catching up rapidly. This has created several Lord-of-the-Flies generations. The rotten “public” schools in Baltimore city have destroyed the employment opportunities of tens of thousands of these children, while the war on drugs, which has caused skyrocketing drug prices and profits, lures them into lives of crime (and death by crime). All of this is a recipe for the mindless destruction of small businesses that was on display in yesterday’s riots and looting. With Al Sharpton reportedly headed to Baltimore, things are bound to get worse before they get better. No sane business person would ever invest in these neighborhoods. Once this is realized in a few years, the absence of drug stores, grocery stores, etc. will of course be blamed on the racism of white capitalists. “Paradise” will at last have been realized.

https://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/liberal-paradise-up-in-flames/
 
  • Like
Reactions: INXS83
What does this even mean? Does 1 person out of 100 move an area from green to red?
 
The Economics at Ground Zero of Riot Central Baltimore

It's about kids educated in a rotten public school system, where minimum wages laws prevent youth from getting that all important first job and where government welfare payments rage on destroying the incentive to maintain the nuclear family..





http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2015/04/the-economics-at-ground-zero-of-riot.html


It is always interesting how you folks excuse the divorce rate among white people when making the conservative racist nuclear family argument.
 
Right, because when I think conservative, I think of New York.

NY-City.jpg
 
The Economics at Ground Zero of Riot Central Baltimore

It's about kids educated in a rotten public school system, where minimum wages laws prevent youth from getting that all important first job and where government welfare payments rage on destroying the incentive to maintain the nuclear family..





http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2015/04/the-economics-at-ground-zero-of-riot.html
What is the significance of the blood lead levels and how would one go about dealing with such a thing through public policy?
 
What is the significance of the blood lead levels and how would one go about dealing with such a thing through public policy?
I suppose you would have to e-mail the author. I can surmise that he was implying that it was liberal public policy that administers the lead and they do nada. But, there there to help the people.
 
I suppose you would have to e-mail the author. I can surmise that he was implying that it was liberal public policy that administers the lead and they do nada. But, there there to help the people.
Are there leadmobiles that tour larger inner cities? The things I miss growing up in Iowa.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FlickShagwell
Does the article mention anything about Baltimore being a liberal paradise?

“Liberal Paradise” Up in Flames
Thomas DiLorenzo

Maryland is indeed by far the most left-wing state in America, a veritable showcase of the “liberal” welfare state. It has huge populations of both government employees and welfare parasites; one of the most generous welfare systems of any state; its “public” schools have long been destroyed by belligerent teachers’ unions....

Be careful of the sources you quote, Nat. Maryland's schools were the best in the nation in 2013 according to this article - and had been for 5 straight years.
 
The Economics at Ground Zero of Riot Central Baltimore

It's about kids educated in a rotten public school system, where minimum wages laws prevent youth from getting that all important first job and where government welfare payments rage on destroying the incentive to maintain the nuclear family..





http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2015/04/the-economics-at-ground-zero-of-riot.html

The conditions deserve attention and should be addressed. But the implication that eliminating the minimum wage and welfare support programs would fix those conditions is just as ludicrous as the idea that if only teen mothers would marry their deadbeat baby-daddies, the nuclear family and all of society would thrive.

It's nice to see cons and libertarians looking at actual problems for a change. Now if we can just get them to aim some actual thinking at them, we might get somewhere.
 
Are there leadmobiles that tour larger inner cities? The things I miss growing up in Iowa.
Most decent-sized cities have lead abatement programs. It's a pretty serious problem:

The city of Davenport has received a $2.5 million federal grant that will be used to make about 200 homes/housing units in the city and surrounding areas lead-safe, especially for children.

To qualify for lead help, one’s property must have been built before 1978, be inhabited by a low- or moderate-income family and have a child younger than 6 years either living in or regularly visiting the property. Homes with expectant mothers also qualify.

The reason for the child requirement is that lead is especially hazardous to young people, and the prevalence of lead poisoning among children younger than 6 years is four times higher in Iowa than the national average. Although lead poisoning causes significant health issues, most lead-poisoned children demonstrate no visible symptoms.


LINK
 
The conditions deserve attention and should be addressed. But the implication that eliminating the minimum wage and welfare support programs would fix those conditions is just as ludicrous as the idea that if only teen mothers would marry their deadbeat baby-daddies, the nuclear family and all of society would thrive.

It's nice to see cons and libertarians looking at actual problems for a change. Now if we can just get them to aim some actual thinking at them, we might get somewhere.
The conditions deserve attention and should be addressed. But the implication that eliminating the minimum wage and welfare support programs would fix those conditions is just as ludicrous as the idea that if only teen mothers would marry their deadbeat baby-daddies, the nuclear family and all of society would thrive.

It's nice to see cons and libertarians looking at actual problems for a change. Now if we can just get them to aim some actual thinking at them, we might get somewhere.
Now this is ludicrous. Libraries are filled with libertarian solutions. Because you turn a blind eye doesn't make it less visible. Dismantling minimum wage laws are part of the solution. They are unemployment bills since it becomes a crime to employ someone at 1 cent less than allowed by law...even though 2 parties had come to a mutual agreement.

From the same author:


What did the recent governor of Maryland, Martin O'Malley, do to relieve the situation? In 2014, he signed into law, legislation that will raise the minimum wage over time from the the level of $7.25, at the time of signing, to $10.10 an hour.

Yup, poorly trained black youth, who aren't productive enough to find jobs at $7.25, will eventually not be allowed to work unless they can find jobs paying them $10.10 per hour.

-RW

Also see: An Excellent Explanation of Minimum Wage Math

http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2015/04/as-baltimore-burns-unemployment-rate.html
 
Riots, Empire and the War on Drugs
Michael S. Rozeff




Riots in Baltimore in April, and it isn’t even riot weather yet. Why?

The immediate cause is the brutal callousness of policemen in the American police state. Whatever has contributed to that police state mentality and activity provides the deeper reasons why the festering repression is breaking out into open hostilities and riot.

Pure racism based on skin color alone is not the direct cause of this rioting. Race is definitely involved but indirectly. Two important causes are at work. First, national policies of empire and war have afflicted poorer Americans more than the wealthier, and racial enclaves are poorer. Second, the war on drugs is a war on black people based upon the fears of the dominant white culture. These fears translate into votes for strong anti-drug measures. Pure racism based on color is not the basic variable in this war on black people. Therefore, blaming racism and looking for solutions to racism using standard liberal pap and remedies will not work.


National policies of empire and war have caused these riots through a variety of paths and channels. The militarized economy is not a healthy economy. Guns can’t be eaten. They don’t provide shelter or warmth. Excessive auto and home loans sooner or later run smack into low incomes that cannot cover the payments. Higher minimum wages throw disadvantaged workers out of work. National policies that distribute military weapons and gear to cops while training them to look upon Americans as unruly enemies create a police state.

Policemen in ghettos find it easier to find minor infractions and beat up on poorer people unorganized to resist. Enforcement of the war on drugs is far more stringent against blacks than whites, and that is due not only to the relative lack of power and organization in the ghettos but also because this enforcement is what whites have wanted and what has been reflected in the politics and laws.

Here is what an undercover narc has said about the greater police repression of drugs in the black than the white population:

“It was only later that I realized that the reason they were sending me into that place was because it was a black club and they wanted the black clubs shut down.”

[Interviewer] “So it was racially motivated?

“In most cases I don’t think it was. It’s just easier to bust those guys. You give me a squad of narcs and drug dogs, and we’ll go to some affluent white community. I can walk down the streets sniffing cars, do some knock-and-talks, and I assure you we’ll come across some marijuana parties. I guarantee I can come out of there with some drug arrests. But after the first day, after the mayor’s phone rings off the hook—that’s the end of that operation.”

In the same interview, this man explains how the war on drugs increased the violence in the communities and how this violence then caused many productive people to flee the neighborhoods. The drug trade that had been controlled by organizations that kept the peace altered when these organizations were attacked and dismantled. Gangs and turf wars proliferated. All of this has weakened the black communities, weakened their economies and weakened the job opportunities. The ground for rioting has been fertilized by the war on drugs.

https://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/riots-empire-and-the-war-on-drugs/
 
Jscott, some quick questions. Prove you're not just a troll. Black racism,...your thoughts?

How does it compare? Is it safe to say it exists at a higher percentage than with white people? I also wonder if you realize the concentration of black people in these areas? You want some crediblity? Then talk to me about this. Challenge laid out. Your move.

What is your game here?
 
So, jscott. You are implying all conservatives are racists. You are a sad, warped puppy.
 
What does this even mean? Does 1 person out of 100 move an area from green to red?

Am I getting punked, or did I read that they came across the data by looking for Google searches for the N-Word from each area over a certain time? Are you f'ing kidding me?

What if there were a bunch of students at Georgetown doing a paper on the origin of the word? Or any school? Just because someone Googles the word doesn't make them racist. In fact, it is just a word. The negativity behind it came from how it was used, not the word itself.

In fact, you would think truly racist, bigoted people wouldn't Google the word at all.

I feel like I'm losing my mind.

And how does one measure something as abstract as racism? This is where technology — in this incidence, Google search — comes in handy. The study used data on how often people searched a racial epithet on the Internet to determine where racists lived.

“Area racism was the proportion of Google searches containing the ‘N-word’ in 196 designated market areas,” according to PLOS One, whose name is derived from that of the organization Public Library of Science.

This method, according to the Post, is more effective than it sounds because people are not constrained by typical social taboos when they conduct searches online and because attempts were made to control for uses of the epithet likely not intended as pejorative.
What does this even mean? Does 1 person out of 100 move an area from green to red?
 
So, jscott. You are implying all conservatives are racists. You are a sad, warped puppy.
I want to test him to see if he's a troll, a race baiter, or just a kid who runs his mouth and doesn't know what he speaks of.

I know he can see this. It would be refreshing to see you have a real discussion for once Jscott.
 
I know you saw this Jscott, the alert system is just for making sure you see responses.

Jscott, some quick questions. Prove you're not just a troll. Black racism,...your thoughts?
How does it compare? Is it safe to say it exists at a higher percentage than with white people? I also wonder if you realize the concentration of black people in these areas? You want some crediblity? Then talk to me about this. Challenge laid out. Your move.
What is your game here?...and why are you too afraid to get into a debate? That fragile are you?
 
I know you saw this Jscott, the alert system is just for making sure you see responses.

Jscott, some quick questions. Prove you're not just a troll. Black racism,...your thoughts?
How does it compare? Is it safe to say it exists at a higher percentage than with white people? I also wonder if you realize the concentration of black people in these areas? You want some crediblity? Then talk to me about this. Challenge laid out. Your move.
What is your game here?...and why are you too afraid to get into a debate? That fragile are you?

No offense, AT, but all I really want to do here is mock conservatives and conservatism. I've been very clear on this in the past and it's just not gonna change because you are throwing a tantrum. You should be more like swag and develop a fine sense of humor. Good day to you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalmwa
No offense, AT, but all I really want to do here is mock conservatives and conservatism. I've been very clear on this in the past and it's just not gonna change because you are throwing a tantrum. You should be more like swag and develop a fine sense of humor. Good day to you.
Well at least you answered this time. Fine, you just want to troll conservatives then? Nothing wrong with that.
 
No offense, AT, but all I really want to do here is mock conservatives and conservatism. I've been very clear on this in the past and it's just not gonna change because you are throwing a tantrum. You should be more like swag and develop a fine sense of humor. Good day to you.
Now this is funny.

"Dude, don't mind me, I'm just here to troll."

Awesome!
 
Now this is funny.

"Dude, don't mind me, I'm just here to troll."

Awesome!
Obviously he hasn't graduated to trolling both sides yet though. I was just curious how serious he was and why he never made a point to eloquently defend his positioning.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT