Hey, I'm sorry, if I'm in the minority, I guess its just IMHO. Seriously though, you have to be kidding when you say the recruiting advantage is negligible right? So your the only school doing this. Your telling potencial recruits up front, that your going to take them on an all expenses paid trip to some great local, EVERY SPRING, and thats not an advantage? Your kidding right? This is one of those arms wars races that seperates the have's and the have not. You do get that right. You really think in this time of cutting budgets to state universities that sending football players on trips every year and a cost of millions of dollars, (no matter who's paying for it), makes good sense? And you don't see how this type of activity will seperate further the big money schools, (Michigan, Texas, Notre Dame, as example) from others? You are correct on one thing however, they're supposed to be STUDENT athletes! This is why when Kansas builds a posh new dorm for the basketball players, they had to make it big enough to house a like number of non athletes, because otherwise its not legal. Now if this is really about education, then Michigan needs to take a like number of non players on these trips, as I'm sure such a trip would be a unique opportunity for them as well.....