ADVERTISEMENT

Millions of Women Will Lose Access to Contraception as a Result of Trump Aid Cuts

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
79,976
63,719
113
The United States is ending its financial support for family planning programs in developing countries, cutting nearly 50 million women off from access to contraception.
This policy change has attracted little attention amid the wholesale dismantling of American foreign aid, but it stands to have enormous implications, including more maternal deaths and an overall increase in poverty. It derails an effort that had brought long-acting contraceptives to women in some of the poorest and most isolated parts of the world in recent years.
The United States provided about 40 percent of the funding governments contributed to family planning programs in 31 developing countries, some $600 million, in 2023, the last year for which data is available, according to KFF, a health research organization.
That American funding provided contraceptive devices and the medical services to deliver them to more than 47 million women and couples, which is estimated to have averted 17.1 million unintended pregnancies and 5.2 million unsafe abortions, according to an analysis by the Guttmacher Institute, a sexual health research organization. Without this annual contribution, 34,000 women could die from preventable maternal deaths each year, the Guttmacher calculation concluded.

 
JFC...

It's absud that our tax dollars were going to this in the first place.
Absolutely,.. Why are we the contraception provider for the world?
The US used to be the leader of the free world. Has the US not taken advantage of other countries to become an economic and military powerhouse? Does it really not make sense to give back?

Or do I have that all wrong?
 
The Catholic Church’s view is that while AIDS is bad, it’s not as bad as condoms.

So They are not my standard bearer for ethical behavior.

Then let the Lutherans take up the slack, it’s still not Uncle Sam’s job to borrow money on the American public’s back for programs like this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RagnarLothbrok
$600,000,000 might sound like a lot but when the US Government's revenue is $4,920,000,000,000 that is 0.012%

To make the math easy that's like if your income is $100,000 (I know most of us here make 7 figures). That's $12
$600,000,000 is a lot when you borrow it and have to carry the interest on that debt in perpetuity.

If you fund that $600,000,000 with a federal debt that is average 4%, over the next 50 years you’ll hand Wall Street $1,200,000,000 (at no additional value provided to taxpayers) and still owe the entire original $600,000,000.

Stop it.
 
$600,000,000 might sound like a lot but when the US Government's revenue is $4,920,000,000,000 that is 0.012%

To make the math easy that's like if your income is $100,000 (I know most of us here make 7 figures). That's $12
This is the kind of thinking that has this country in a $36 trillion hole and climbing....how does $250,000 per man, woman and child sit with you??
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT