Nate Stanley
- Thread starter IowaMeatMan
- Start date
from all reports, likely will be brought back for their practice squad
A
anon_ts5cfra6drv7r
Guest
Phew. Glad I took CJB in my draft and not Stanley. Would’ve been a dumb pick.
Not a surprise. Making some dough on the practice squad is at least something. Nate's a kid who I suspect will do just fine in life post football if a pro roster spot doesn't pan out for him.
Nate's realistic NFL dream was making a practice squad this year, so it is all going according to plan. Good luck to Nate.
Surprising that the team wants to carry 4 QB.
Surprising that the team wants to carry 4 QB.
Nate has been resigned to the practice squad along with QB Jake Browning.
It's because the practice squads have been expanded from 13 to 16 this year because of COVID.
I’m still waiting for friggin’ Ferentz to sit Stanley and put Petras in. He’s a FOUR STAR! Watch him transfer!
Nate has made $557k in the NFL so far.
www.spotrac.com
Nate Stanley
Nate Stanley contract and salary cap details, full contract breakdowns, salaries, signing bonus, roster bonus, dead money, and valuations.
Nate has made $557k in the NFL so far.
Nate Stanley
Nate Stanley contract and salary cap details, full contract breakdowns, salaries, signing bonus, roster bonus, dead money, and valuations.
Paid, not made...our government sees to that.
I disagree. It’s time to let the Deuce loose 🤣
This was my comment almost 2 years ago and I still think it holds true now.
Nate was a solid, but unspectacular, big ten caliber QB. That's not nothing.
It's always possible he gets a camp invite with another team. Seems more likely, though, that he moves forward with his post football playing days life.
Well the Packers waived Kurt Warner after a day. And plus it’s the Vikings!!!!!
He will probably end up as a starter for the Bears!
Big Nate. Still unbeaten against Iowa State.
Coaching is in the veins.
Sight unseen Nate will throw for equal or more yards than DeShaun Watson this season.
He made the right decision by staying - would not have seen the field anywhere else.
Right, because people should be able to live free here, and “someone else” should pay.
Nate also won all three bowl games he started and finished second to Chuck Long in all the important passing categories. No, he wasn't flashy but a good consistent QB.
Except TD/Int ratio---where Nate is a clear no. 1
Just compare Nate to all the other three year starters? Tied for most wins and first in everything else, except completion %. Oh, tied for most wins so the Nate bashing that went on and still surfaces really has come to seem something more weird than simple delusion.
Nate was average
By what metric, certainly not by the standards of Iowa QBs. So, what part of reality are you living in?
Career passing yards-2nd. Chuck Long started four years, so among 3 years #1. Completions, 2nd-1st among 3 years. Career TDs; wanna guess? Second, is the winning call and, of course, #1 among 3 year starters. TD/Int ratio. Well, much better than even Chuck Long in that.
By way of comparison Drew Tate, had a season with 22 TDs, with no running game, 20 and 18 jr and sr seasons. Drew only threw for more yards than Nate in their soph seasons, Nate threw for more yards as both a jr and sr. Nate way outperformed Ricky in their respective soph and jr seasons.
In fact, with the exception of Ricky's senior season, Nate threw more TDs (26) in his soph and jr seasons than any other QB in any season---wait BB might have thrown 26 his senior year -- of the Ferentz years. Rare company, is it not? Last, Nate's teams records improved every year, and he went out on a ten win year with a blow out of USC in a high visibility game.
So really I kind of meant what I said jonesy. Pretty much every single positive statistical category. Team wise, Nate's tied with Ricky at 27 wins as a starter, more than any other three-year starter in Iowa history.
Those are the numbers. Nate may have been "average" by some definition but not by comparison to almost every other QB that has played for Iowa in 125-130 years.
By way of comparison Drew Tate, had a season with 22 TDs, with no running game, 20 and 18 jr and sr seasons. Drew only threw for more yards than Nate in their soph seasons, Nate threw for more yards as both a jr and sr. Nate way outperformed Ricky in their respective soph and jr seasons.
In fact, with the exception of Ricky's senior season, Nate threw more TDs (26) in his soph and jr seasons than any other QB in any season---wait BB might have thrown 26 his senior year -- of the Ferentz years. Rare company, is it not? Last, Nate's teams records improved every year, and he went out on a ten win year with a blow out of USC in a high visibility game.
So really I kind of meant what I said jonesy. Pretty much every single positive statistical category. Team wise, Nate's tied with Ricky at 27 wins as a starter, more than any other three-year starter in Iowa history.
Those are the numbers. Nate may have been "average" by some definition but not by comparison to almost every other QB that has played for Iowa in 125-130 years.
I would think that the most important passing categories are Yards Per Attempt, Completion Percentage, Td/Int
Ratio, and Passer Rating. Since Long, seven QB's have a better YPA than Nate did. Since Long nine QB's have a better passing percentage than Nate did. Since Long 7 QB's had a higher passer rating than Nate. Nate did have the best TD/INT ratio in Iowa history, but he was far from leading every statistically important passing category since Chuck Long. Not even close.
And I'm not bashing Nate who I think was a solid quarterback at Iowa. Nevada's statement was categorically false.
Latest posts
-
-
Missouri State Transfer WR Raylen Sharpe Visiting Iowa on Tuesday- Latest: Eliot Clough
-
-
-
