LINCOLN — A slate of decisions from the Nebraska Supreme Court Friday kept two abortion questions and a initiative to repeal a private school scholarship measure on the 2024 ballot.
The high court ruled on four lawsuits challenging the two ballot measures to alter Nebraska abortion policy and repeal a new law allocating funds for private school scholarships. The rulings kept all three measures on the ballot, for now.
Two of the lawsuits were essentially identical, and asked the court to remove a ballot measure that would amend the state's constitution to establish the right to an abortion up until "fetal viability," which is generally considered to be 23 to 24 weeks of pregnancy. They alleged the initiative violates a provision in the Nebraska Constitution that limits ballot measures to a single subject.
A third lawsuit asked the court to treat the abortion rights initiative the same as a second initiative that would restrict most abortions beyond the first trimester.
The fourth lawsuit related to a separate initiative seeking to partially repeal Legislative Bill 1402, removing the program and funding mechanism that allocates $10 million per year to fund private and parochial school scholarships. Arguments on all four cases were first made before the court earlier this week.
Updates below:
The justices ruled that seeking to create a constitutional right to abortion "has a singleness of subject." The use of additional words the two lawsuits relied on are not separate subjects but "facets of the singular subject," the justices determined.
Multiple ballot initiatives in previous years, including a 2020 attempt to put medical marijuana legalization in front of voters, have been struck down by the Nebraska Supreme Court on single subject grounds.
Those who brought the lawsuits, known as relators, said the abortion initiative had at least four separate goals or subjects.
In a unanimous decision, the Nebraska Supreme Court disagreed.
"Having reviewed the text of the proposed constitutional amendment, we determine that the parts of the Initiative all relate to the same general subject of creating a constitutional right to abortion," the opinion reads. "The parts of the Initiative define the limits and set parameters for that right and define terms for purposes of the proposed constitutional provision."
The organizers of the Protect Our Rights campaign, which collected over 200,000 signatures in support of the petition, celebrated the decision.
"We are on the ballot," Allie Berry, Protect Our Rights campaign manager, said. "This is a victory for all Nebraskans. Anti-abortion politicians forced an abortion ban into law and then coordinated with activists to launch desperate lawsuits to silence over 200,000 Nebraskans by preventing them from voting on what happens to their bodies."
The text of the Protect Our Rights ballot initiative, now expected to be on November's ballot after the ruling, reads:
"All persons shall have a fundamental right to abortion until fetal viability, or when needed to protect the life or health of the pregnant patient, without interference from the state or its political subdivisions. Fetal viability means the point in pregnancy when, in the professional judgment of the patient’s treating health care practitioner, there is a significant likelihood of the fetus’ sustained survival outside the uterus without the application of extraordinary medical measures."
The Nebraska Supreme Court rejected a lawsuit that asked justices to treat two abortion-related initiatives evenly, either removing both from the ballot or keeping both. The lawsuit was filed in response to two other lawsuits that challenged one ballot measure seeking to protect the right to abortion until "fetal viability."
The high court ruled that the other abortion initiative, which seeks to ban most abortions after the first trimester, does not violate the single-subject rule.
"In November, voters have the choice to reject the extreme Protect the Right to Abortion amendment that invites government intrusion between a woman and her doctor, giving unlicensed individuals influence over minors in crisis, and paves the way for taxpayer-funded abortions," the Protect Women and Children Nebraska Committee said in a statement. That group is behind the amendment that would restrict abortion.
The high court ruled that since the ballot initiative only seeks to repeal the first section of LB 1402, which "makes no appropriation at all," Secretary of State Bob Evnen is not required to remove it from the ballot.
There remains a question as to whether Evnen will remove the measure anyway. In a document filed in the case, Evnen said although he certified the initiative, afterward he became convinced the measure was ineligible for the ballot. However, Evnen said he would defer to the court's judgment.
omaha.com
The high court ruled on four lawsuits challenging the two ballot measures to alter Nebraska abortion policy and repeal a new law allocating funds for private school scholarships. The rulings kept all three measures on the ballot, for now.
Two of the lawsuits were essentially identical, and asked the court to remove a ballot measure that would amend the state's constitution to establish the right to an abortion up until "fetal viability," which is generally considered to be 23 to 24 weeks of pregnancy. They alleged the initiative violates a provision in the Nebraska Constitution that limits ballot measures to a single subject.
A third lawsuit asked the court to treat the abortion rights initiative the same as a second initiative that would restrict most abortions beyond the first trimester.
The fourth lawsuit related to a separate initiative seeking to partially repeal Legislative Bill 1402, removing the program and funding mechanism that allocates $10 million per year to fund private and parochial school scholarships. Arguments on all four cases were first made before the court earlier this week.
Updates below:
Court rejects lawsuits challenging abortion rights petition
The court ruled that the ballot measure seeking to protect the right to abortion did not violate the state constitution's single-subject rule.The justices ruled that seeking to create a constitutional right to abortion "has a singleness of subject." The use of additional words the two lawsuits relied on are not separate subjects but "facets of the singular subject," the justices determined.
Multiple ballot initiatives in previous years, including a 2020 attempt to put medical marijuana legalization in front of voters, have been struck down by the Nebraska Supreme Court on single subject grounds.
Those who brought the lawsuits, known as relators, said the abortion initiative had at least four separate goals or subjects.
In a unanimous decision, the Nebraska Supreme Court disagreed.
"Having reviewed the text of the proposed constitutional amendment, we determine that the parts of the Initiative all relate to the same general subject of creating a constitutional right to abortion," the opinion reads. "The parts of the Initiative define the limits and set parameters for that right and define terms for purposes of the proposed constitutional provision."
The organizers of the Protect Our Rights campaign, which collected over 200,000 signatures in support of the petition, celebrated the decision.
"We are on the ballot," Allie Berry, Protect Our Rights campaign manager, said. "This is a victory for all Nebraskans. Anti-abortion politicians forced an abortion ban into law and then coordinated with activists to launch desperate lawsuits to silence over 200,000 Nebraskans by preventing them from voting on what happens to their bodies."
The text of the Protect Our Rights ballot initiative, now expected to be on November's ballot after the ruling, reads:
"All persons shall have a fundamental right to abortion until fetal viability, or when needed to protect the life or health of the pregnant patient, without interference from the state or its political subdivisions. Fetal viability means the point in pregnancy when, in the professional judgment of the patient’s treating health care practitioner, there is a significant likelihood of the fetus’ sustained survival outside the uterus without the application of extraordinary medical measures."
All or nothing case rejected
The Nebraska Supreme Court rejected a lawsuit that asked justices to treat two abortion-related initiatives evenly, either removing both from the ballot or keeping both. The lawsuit was filed in response to two other lawsuits that challenged one ballot measure seeking to protect the right to abortion until "fetal viability."
The high court ruled that the other abortion initiative, which seeks to ban most abortions after the first trimester, does not violate the single-subject rule.
"In November, voters have the choice to reject the extreme Protect the Right to Abortion amendment that invites government intrusion between a woman and her doctor, giving unlicensed individuals influence over minors in crisis, and paves the way for taxpayer-funded abortions," the Protect Women and Children Nebraska Committee said in a statement. That group is behind the amendment that would restrict abortion.
'School choice' challenge denied
The Nebraska Supreme Court rejected a lawsuit requesting the removal of a ballot measure that seeks to partially repeal a new law, Legislative Bill 1402, which allocates $10 million per year to support private school scholarships. The lawsuit alleged that the measure violated a provision of the state constitution that prohibits voter referendums from impacting direct appropriations.The high court ruled that since the ballot initiative only seeks to repeal the first section of LB 1402, which "makes no appropriation at all," Secretary of State Bob Evnen is not required to remove it from the ballot.
There remains a question as to whether Evnen will remove the measure anyway. In a document filed in the case, Evnen said although he certified the initiative, afterward he became convinced the measure was ineligible for the ballot. However, Evnen said he would defer to the court's judgment.
Nebraska Supreme Court keeps two abortion questions, scholarship repeal on ballot
A slate of decisions from the Nebraska Supreme Court Friday and state officials will have major impact in what the state's ballot will include this November.
