ADVERTISEMENT

New division

Should they break into 2 divisions?

  • Yes

    Votes: 16 55.2%
  • No

    Votes: 13 44.8%

  • Total voters
    29

obfuscating

HR Heisman
Jan 8, 2016
9,977
7,460
113
Should they break into 2 divisions?

NIL = top 20 NIL teams, no longer allowed to do amateur football as the players are being put on a payroll. No transfer to other division.

D1.2 All remaining scholarship only STUDENT - athlete teams. FCS style playoff. No crossover play with non-amateur teams.
 
Should they break into 2 divisions?

NIL = top 20 NIL teams, no longer allowed to do amateur football as the players are being put on a payroll. No transfer to other division.

D1.2 All remaining scholarship only STUDENT - athlete teams. FCS style playoff. No crossover play with non-amateur teams.
You have some sorting out to do with foreign students on a student visa with that scheme, for starters.
 
Best they can do is limit the portal activity, Limit the transfer portal window to May/June when Bowls and playoffs are not in play. Give it a good full two months open for visits-etc. Also allowed one free transfer but next transfer you must sit a year. A third transfer is only available for graduate students. As far as NIL, they can't do much.

Unless a conference steps in like the Big Ten and says they are splitting the pot with players, like for example taking 25 percent of the money from schools pot. Paying the players a base for being scholarship and also pay those who play percentage. Schools don't want these players to be considered employees because of legal concerns, but there is nothing stopping the conference from considering them employees of the Conference.

Hypothetical 25 Percent of Each Schools TV contract is 25 Million Per School. 10 Million goes to the base salary of each scholarship athlete. (117k Per Person Per Year (85 Scholarships)) 15 Million is a bonus for those who actually hit the field.
Based on a 13 game season. That leaves 1.15 Million available per game to be earned on the field. Depending on play percentage per athlete each game. This is the draw for Walk ons to get paid but are not on scholarship. A average college football game has 160 plays per game. If someone is talented enough to play both ways on offense and defense, they will get a full percentage. (Plays played in a game)Divided by (Total Plays) Multiply by 1/11 of 1.15 Million Available that game = Gameday Payday.

A player playing both ways on offense and defense, Lets say they play 130 plays out of 160 is 81.2 Percent of plays on the field. He would take home a Gameday Payday around 85k for that one game.

This would truly pay for NIL because of their TV exposure. Opt outs in Bowl games would stop, players would try to get on the field more than ever before, you would not have a situation similar to these High Profile athletes who get "injured" when a season isn't going well with plans on transferring out at the end.

Just a Hypothetical, one can dream but this is the best idea I could come up with. Hopefully someone has a better one considering the circumstances we live in. Some of you will say it will take too much away from the athletic budgets of these schools. Will not split the pot enough to other sports, TBH what other sports bring in as much money as football? Another thing about this I would love, it would get guys who are so uber talented to start playing both ways. Who wouldn't want Cooper for Iowa playing both ways?
 
Last edited:
Best they can do is limit the portal activity, Limit the transfer portal window to May/June when Bowls and playoffs are not in play. Give it a good full two months open for visits-etc. Also allowed one free transfer but next transfer you must sit a year. A third transfer is only available for graduate students. As far as NIL, they can't do much.

Unless a conference steps in like the Big Ten and says they are splitting the pot with players, like for example taking 25 percent of the money from schools pot. Paying the players a base for being scholarship and also pay those who play percentage. Schools don't want these players to be considered employees because of legal concerns, but there is nothing stopping the conference from considering them employees of the Conference.

Hypothetical 25 Percent of Each Schools TV contract is 25 Million Per School. 10 Million goes to the base salary of each scholarship athlete. (117k Per Person Per Year (85 Scholarships)) 15 Million is a bonus for those who actually hit the field.
Based on a 13 game season. That leaves 1.15 Million available per game to be earned on the field. Depending on play percentage per athlete each game. This is the draw for Walk ons to get paid but are not on scholarship. A average college football game has 160 plays per game. If someone is talented enough to play both ways on offense and defense, they will get a full percentage. (Plays played in a game)Divided by (Total Plays) Multiply by 1/11 of 1.15 Million Available that game = Gameday Payday.

A player playing both ways on offense and defense, Lets say they play 130 plays out of 160 is 81.2 Percent of plays on the field. He would take home a Gameday Payday around 85k for that one game.

This would truly pay for NIL because of their TV exposure. Opt outs in Bowl games would stop, players would try to get on the field more than ever before, you would not have a situation similar to these High Profile athletes who get "injured" when a season isn't going well with plans on transferring out at the end.

Just a Hypothetical, one can dream but this is the best idea I could come up with. Hopefully someone has a better one considering the circumstances we live in. Some of you will say it will take too much away from the athletic budgets of these schools. Will not split the pot enough to other sports, TBH what other sports bring in as much money as football? Another thing about this I would love, it would get guys who are so uber talented to start playing both ways. Who wouldn't want Cooper for Iowa playing both ways?
Interesting thoughts. You have to remember though that the "stars" have no interest in on a "pay for number of plays" set up. And really that has nothing to do with "Name Image and Likeness" at all. Its not a pay all players from the same pot scenario. Players, (at least the ones who think they are stars), want to be paid for the use of their likeness because they are "stars". As example, theres no way that a C Clark is going to get paid the same "NIL" money as Gabbie Marshall. Same thing in football. The Bama QB making a million/season isn't going to be down with that scenario, (as much sense as it makes for the game) because thats NOT what NIL is about. They want to be paid for the "star" quality they bring to the game as playmakers, and not be paid the same as the offensive guard who blocks for them. What your proposing is basically an employee/employer relationship which will be just as problamatic for the conference as it would be the schools. (Here comes the union, or players association, not to mention the feds).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bishop1971
ADVERTISEMENT