New practice fields.

[hawksauce]

10/10. I think it's time to bring the Tigerhawk to Kinnick.

 

[Douglas C. Neidermeyer]

Is that the FatHead logo that fell off the water tower?

 

[Packer54]

10/10. I think it's time to bring the Tigerhawk to Kinnick.

It just makes too much sense. What a great branding element to the program and we don't use it. Beyond me.
I have racked my little brain to try to understand "why not". I have not come up with a valid reason.

 

[Hawkeye_311]

If they are installing the Tigerhawk on one of the practice fields it's safe to say it will be in Kinnick when they replace the turf after this season.

 

[CoorsHawk23]

It just makes too much sense. What a great branding element to the program and we don't use it. Beyond me.
I have racked my little brain to try to understand "why not". I have not come up with a valid reason.

I was under the impression that it's hospital property and they won't do it. Pretty lame

 

[Packer54]

I was under the impression that it's hospital property and they won't do it. Pretty lame

Yes the water tower. I was referencing the stadium field.

 

[riley35]

10/10. I think it's time to bring the Tigerhawk to Kinnick.

I've been asking for this for decades.

 

[Hawkeye_311]

Yes the water tower. I was referencing the stadium field.

You guys are both wrong. The same owner owns the Hospital and Kinnick Stadium. They are just two separate parcels of land with the same owner.

Deed Holder: State Of Iowa For The Use & Benefit Of The State University Of Iowa

Contract Holder:
Mailing Address U Of I
4 Jessup Hall
Iowa City IA 52242

The Johnson County Assessor website is your friend.

 

[Packer54]

You guys are both wrong. The same owner owns the Hospital and Kinnick Stadium. They are just two separate parcels of land with the same owner.

Deed Holder: State Of Iowa For The Use & Benefit Of The State University Of Iowa

Contract Holder:
Mailing Address U Of I
4 Jessup Hall
Iowa City IA 52242

The Johnson County Assessor website is your friend.

I was basically saying yes we should have the logo on the water tower but I was specifically referencing the field. I was assuming he was referencing wanting the logo on the water tower. I don't know, nor care, who has rights to what. My initial comment was I have never heard a viable reason why we don't have the logo on the field....huge missed opportunity.

 

[Hawkeye_311]

I was basically saying yes we should have the logo on the water tower but I was specifically referencing the field. I was assuming he was referencing wanting the logo on the water tower. I don't know, nor care, who has rights to what. My initial comment was I have never heard a viable reason why we don't have the logo on the field....huge missed opportunity.

100% agree with the logo on the field. Should of went in with the new turf in 2009.

 

[hawkbleeder]

Apprently we don't want to be too sexy. Except for the end zones.