ADVERTISEMENT

Northern Iowa faculty seek end to general fund support for athletics

cigaretteman

HR King
May 29, 2001
77,442
58,934
113
With University of Northern Iowa strapped for cash and its tuition revenue sliding, unionized faculty members are criticizing the administration for giving nearly $4.3 million of the campus’ general university funds to athletics in the 2023 budget year — which was almost $1 million more than planned.



UNI in fiscal 2022 funneled $3.5 million to athletics, which was $148,616 more than budgeted — amounting to $7.8 million total over the two years, or $1.06 million more than expected.


And UNI’s United Faculty union is calling for an end to the practice of shifting general university funds to athletics — urging UNI Athletics to become self-supporting, like its counterparts at the University of Iowa and Iowa State University.





ADVERTISING



“What we'd like to see going forward is that the auxiliary units be self-sustaining,” United Faculty president and UNI digital journalism professor Christopher Martin told The Gazette. “That they don't dip back into the general university support.”


The reason, he said, is straightforward.


“On the academic side, we're really just cut to the bone,” Martin said. “We have so many faculty lines that we need to have filled and replaced.”


The millions UNI funnels to Panther Athletics annually “would really help us a lot,” Martin said about the university’s academic enterprise, which he called “the main mission of the university.”


“Almost every department is just kind of begging for more faculty,” he said, pointing to program closures — like the Textiles and Apparel major no longer accepting new students — as fallout of the faculty shortfall. “We're really just trying to do our best to keep up the academic excellence with fewer and fewer faculty.”


‘Difficult decisions’​


UNI Athletics is different from UI and ISU athletics in that it can’t sustain its budget alone and needs an annual boost from the general university fund to make ends meet — although UI Athletics during the pandemic borrowing $50 million from the main campus, which it hasn’t paid back.





.


Although UNI administrators agree that academics, student success, and faculty support are central to the campus’ mission, spokesman Pete Moris said athletics play an important role too.


“Supporting successful NCAA Division I athletic programs at UNI is integral in helping drive applications, admissions and financial giving to the institution,” Moris said. “The success of our student-athletes in the classroom and in competition elevates the national profile of our entire institution, helping energize our campus and our alumni base and our greater Cedar Valley community.”


He acknowledged UNI, “like many of our peer institutions,” has faced “difficult decisions across our entire campus over the last several years.” Among the moves its making in response is a $250 million “Our Tomorrow” fundraising campaign that to date has raised more than $243 million, including more than $169 million for scholarships, faculty support, engaged learning, and academic programs, Moris said.


That fundraising campaign also includes support for athletics facilities — like a new dome for the UNI Dome and a new wrestling facility. And United Faculty argue the general fund distributions to athletics — which have been routine for decades — need to stop.


“The loss of academic funding ultimately affects students at UNI,” United Faculty Vice President Fernando Calderon said. “It also raises a significant question about the budget priorities of this institution.”


Reporting UNI Athletics has among the lowest budgets among its conference peers, Moris said the UNI administration hears its faculty members and “continues to carefully weigh difficult decisions with the best interest of the entire university in mind as we continue in dialogue with the UNI community on this topic.”


“One of the ongoing directives for our athletics department is to generate more revenue and to identify additional opportunities for our athletics department to be more self-sustaining,” Moris said.


‘10 tenure-track faculty lines’​


Martin said UNI administrators also need to do better about taking a shared governance approach in deciding to cover athletics shortfalls — especially when it amounts to $1 million.


“With a million dollars, we're talking at least 10 tenure-track faculty lines with salary and benefits,” President Martin said. “I mean, that's pretty substantial.”


And the faculty union didn’t know about the increase in athletics support until seeing it in the Board of Regents’ comprehensive fiscal report last month.


“We are completely astonished to discover this,” Martin said. “It’s a gut punch to our high goals and expectations for UNI academics.”


UNI, like UI and ISU, has seen its count of tenured and tenure-track faculty plummet over the last decade — with total faculty falling at UNI from 788 in the 2012-2013 academic year to 606 in 2022-23. UNI a decade ago had 453 tenured faculty and 112 tenure-track faculty, where last year it had 330 and 66, respectively, according to Board of Regents documents.


Pre-pandemic in the 2018 budget year, UNI spent $137 million on employee salaries. In fiscal 2023, six years later, UNI spent $123 million — representing a $14 million drop, or 10 percent decline. UNI had expected to spend $130 million last year on salaries but came in $7 million under budget “from attrition in all employee classifications and vacant positions.”


Meanwhile, United Faculty noted in its criticism, that UNI Athletics last year spent more than it budgeted in several sports and brought in less than expected from football, marketing, and miscellaneous moneymakers.


“This came at time when funding for faculty salaries and faculty lines continued to be reduced — by more than $2.087 million in FY 2023 from the previous year, making it the single largest line for defunding,” according to the faculty critique.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: Here_4_a_Day
without athletics what is the atmosphere to attract students?

I don’t think it’s just coincidence that their enrollment is dropping significantly at a time where football and basketball stinks.

Use to be a good tailgate atmosphere and they would occasionally sellout. Now you could toss grenades and not harm anybody. Football draws out out of towners to campus with kids that are potential future students.

wants uni going to do “come to uni and on weekends we will bus you to Iowa city or Ames for the college experience “.

You drop all athletics from uni and what is left? And drop all athletics is exactly what you would have to do. They can’t self fund because of rules on number of sports. Without any type of athletics UNI becomes an expensive community college.

The DIII model uses athletics as an enrollment tool. That wouldn’t work at uni because DIII revenue is zero. It’s a bigger money pit than what UNI has now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthernHawkeye
With University of Northern Iowa strapped for cash and its tuition revenue sliding, unionized faculty members are criticizing the administration for giving nearly $4.3 million of the campus’ general university funds to athletics in the 2023 budget year — which was almost $1 million more than planned.



UNI in fiscal 2022 funneled $3.5 million to athletics, which was $148,616 more than budgeted — amounting to $7.8 million total over the two years, or $1.06 million more than expected.


And UNI’s United Faculty union is calling for an end to the practice of shifting general university funds to athletics — urging UNI Athletics to become self-supporting, like its counterparts at the University of Iowa and Iowa State University.





ADVERTISING



“What we'd like to see going forward is that the auxiliary units be self-sustaining,” United Faculty president and UNI digital journalism professor Christopher Martin told The Gazette. “That they don't dip back into the general university support.”


The reason, he said, is straightforward.


“On the academic side, we're really just cut to the bone,” Martin said. “We have so many faculty lines that we need to have filled and replaced.”


The millions UNI funnels to Panther Athletics annually “would really help us a lot,” Martin said about the university’s academic enterprise, which he called “the main mission of the university.”


“Almost every department is just kind of begging for more faculty,” he said, pointing to program closures — like the Textiles and Apparel major no longer accepting new students — as fallout of the faculty shortfall. “We're really just trying to do our best to keep up the academic excellence with fewer and fewer faculty.”


‘Difficult decisions’​


UNI Athletics is different from UI and ISU athletics in that it can’t sustain its budget alone and needs an annual boost from the general university fund to make ends meet — although UI Athletics during the pandemic borrowing $50 million from the main campus, which it hasn’t paid back.





.


Although UNI administrators agree that academics, student success, and faculty support are central to the campus’ mission, spokesman Pete Moris said athletics play an important role too.


“Supporting successful NCAA Division I athletic programs at UNI is integral in helping drive applications, admissions and financial giving to the institution,” Moris said. “The success of our student-athletes in the classroom and in competition elevates the national profile of our entire institution, helping energize our campus and our alumni base and our greater Cedar Valley community.”


He acknowledged UNI, “like many of our peer institutions,” has faced “difficult decisions across our entire campus over the last several years.” Among the moves its making in response is a $250 million “Our Tomorrow” fundraising campaign that to date has raised more than $243 million, including more than $169 million for scholarships, faculty support, engaged learning, and academic programs, Moris said.


That fundraising campaign also includes support for athletics facilities — like a new dome for the UNI Dome and a new wrestling facility. And United Faculty argue the general fund distributions to athletics — which have been routine for decades — need to stop.


“The loss of academic funding ultimately affects students at UNI,” United Faculty Vice President Fernando Calderon said. “It also raises a significant question about the budget priorities of this institution.”


Reporting UNI Athletics has among the lowest budgets among its conference peers, Moris said the UNI administration hears its faculty members and “continues to carefully weigh difficult decisions with the best interest of the entire university in mind as we continue in dialogue with the UNI community on this topic.”


“One of the ongoing directives for our athletics department is to generate more revenue and to identify additional opportunities for our athletics department to be more self-sustaining,” Moris said.


‘10 tenure-track faculty lines’​


Martin said UNI administrators also need to do better about taking a shared governance approach in deciding to cover athletics shortfalls — especially when it amounts to $1 million.


“With a million dollars, we're talking at least 10 tenure-track faculty lines with salary and benefits,” President Martin said. “I mean, that's pretty substantial.”


And the faculty union didn’t know about the increase in athletics support until seeing it in the Board of Regents’ comprehensive fiscal report last month.


“We are completely astonished to discover this,” Martin said. “It’s a gut punch to our high goals and expectations for UNI academics.”


UNI, like UI and ISU, has seen its count of tenured and tenure-track faculty plummet over the last decade — with total faculty falling at UNI from 788 in the 2012-2013 academic year to 606 in 2022-23. UNI a decade ago had 453 tenured faculty and 112 tenure-track faculty, where last year it had 330 and 66, respectively, according to Board of Regents documents.


Pre-pandemic in the 2018 budget year, UNI spent $137 million on employee salaries. In fiscal 2023, six years later, UNI spent $123 million — representing a $14 million drop, or 10 percent decline. UNI had expected to spend $130 million last year on salaries but came in $7 million under budget “from attrition in all employee classifications and vacant positions.”


Meanwhile, United Faculty noted in its criticism, that UNI Athletics last year spent more than it budgeted in several sports and brought in less than expected from football, marketing, and miscellaneous moneymakers.


“This came at time when funding for faculty salaries and faculty lines continued to be reduced — by more than $2.087 million in FY 2023 from the previous year, making it the single largest line for defunding,” according to the faculty critique.
****ing communists! Bet all those free rides for freaks will still be available!!
 
Sports, sports. More sports!

Zero academics!
A true academic model would involve a lot more online and fewer colleges and tougher entrance requirements. Likely also standardized testing to prove the degree earned is worth the paper it is printed on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GOHOX69
Simply too small of state populace to support. Iowa - and to a lesser degree, ISU, could get away with lessening their state support, but that will never happen.
 
without athletics what is the atmosphere to attract students?

I don’t think it’s just coincidence that their enrollment is dropping significantly at a time where football and basketball stinks.

Use to be a good tailgate atmosphere and they would occasionally sellout. Now you could toss grenades and not harm anybody. Football draws out out of towners to campus with kids that are potential future students.

wants uni going to do “come to uni and on weekends we will bus you to Iowa city or Ames for the college experience “.

You drop all athletics from uni and what is left? And drop all athletics is exactly what you would have to do. They can’t self fund because of rules on number of sports. Without any type of athletics UNI becomes an expensive community college.

The DIII model uses athletics as an enrollment tool. That wouldn’t work at uni because DIII revenue is zero. It’s a bigger money pit than what UNI has now.

There is a big dip coming in college kids later this decade. It's not just UNI.

UNI could keep basketball. Drake was a Division I football school until the mid 80s and now it's basically D-III.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GOHOX69
A true academic model would involve a lot more online and fewer colleges and tougher entrance requirements. Likely also standardized testing to prove the degree earned is worth the paper it is printed on.
Don't disagree at all. Apply that to student athletes as well.
 
They must have studies, who knows how accurate they are, on how much “marketing” money is generated through UNI athletics and the extent it boosts enrollment. I would think that information would guide decision making. How does UNI’s athletic hole compare to a DIII school if UNI just dropped scholarship football?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kelsers
****ing communists! Bet all those free rides for freaks will still be available!!
Wow, what a dumb responce. Pretty much moronic in its complete lack of understanding of higher education delivery and financing . But totally expected given your incompetence in most other of your posts. Class dismissed rookie.
 
There is a big dip coming in college kids later this decade. It's not just UNI.

UNI could keep basketball. Drake was a Division I football school until the mid 80s and now it's basically D-III.

Except that D-III football team made the FCS playoffs this year and went undefeated. I think UNI only made it 3 or 4 years ago.

Got SMASHED in the playoffs but they made it!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Roncuba55
Simple. Kill off athletics at ISU, Iowa becomes flagship athletics school and UNI gets built up to be competitive in I-AA.

Then carpet bomb Ames after clearing everyone out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Here_4_a_Day
Except that D-III football team made the FCS playoffs this year and went undefeated. I think UNI only made it 3 or 4 years ago.

Got SMASHED in the playoffs but they made it!
Drake did not go undefeated, they lost to NAIA Northwestern College out of Orange City and every real FCS team they played.

As others mentioned, they are basically an above average to upper level D3/NAIA team. Nothing wrong with that, but they're FCS in name only.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mayland
Wow, what a dumb responce. Pretty much moronic in its complete lack of understanding of higher education delivery and financing . But totally expected given your incompetence in most other of your posts. Class dismissed rookie.
Tell me you’re not part of the bloat that ruined our education system?
 
Except that D-III football team made the FCS playoffs this year and went undefeated. I think UNI only made it 3 or 4 years ago.

Got SMASHED in the playoffs but they made it!
That’s not really fair. UNI would have beat Drake by about 50 if they would have matched up this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bojihawk44
Drake did not go undefeated, they lost to NAIA Northwestern College out of Orange City and every real FCS team they played.

As others mentioned, they are basically an above average to upper level D3/NAIA team. Nothing wrong with that, but they're FCS in name only.

That’s not really fair. UNI would have beat Drake by about 50 if they would have matched up this year.

Guys, I totally understand. Just thought it was a feel good story for Drake this year. I was meaning to say went undefeated in their conference play.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mayland
Drake is a joke. Non scholarship FCS football is a Jedi mind trick to get around ncaa rules so you can play D1 basketball.

Drake refuses to play uni in football because they know it would be 50-0 and they don’t want to tarnish their image in the minds of the three people that give a shit about Drake football.
 
Drake is a joke. Non scholarship FCS football is a Jedi mind trick to get around ncaa rules so you can play D1 basketball.

Drake refuses to play uni in football because they know it would be 50-0 and they don’t want to tarnish their image in the minds of the three people that give a shit about Drake football.

You dont have to have D1 football to play basketball. WTF?

None of the Big East has football, well except Villanova.
 
You don’t have to sponsor football, but if you do it has to be at the D1 level.

I could see several more schools go the Drake route and some getting out totally.

We are on the verge of a big shift. A lot of those mid tier schools like the MAC, etc. are going to have choices to make. You have 60-65 "P5" teams that at some point will become its own thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mayland
I could see several more schools go the Drake route and some getting out totally.

We are on the verge of a big shift. A lot of those mid tier schools like the MAC, etc. are going to have choices to make. You have 60-65 "P5" teams that at some point will become its own thing.
Yep. With NIL the separation between the haves and have-nots will grow far larger than it already is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JRHawk2003
Drake is back on UNI's schedule in one of the next few years. I know Drake doesn't love it from an optics perspective, but it makes sense that they play. UNI plays an insanely difficulty non-conference schedule every year, and the playoff committee doesn't seem to care about that.

UNI Athletics does more with less compared to other peer schools, the faculty union just likes to pull this media tantrum every few years.

In a perfect world, there would be some sort of limited revenue sharing between the power and non-power schools in D1, because I think the power schools do need the UNI's of the world, but I doubt that will happen.

The Board of Regents needs to decide if they want UNI to be a successful university, and if so, fund it appropriately - knowing athletics are necessary and they will never have the TV revenue Iowa and ISU enjoy.
 
Drake is back on UNI's schedule in one of the next few years. I know Drake doesn't love it from an optics perspective, but it makes sense that they play. UNI plays an insanely difficulty non-conference schedule every year, and the playoff committee doesn't seem to care about that.

UNI Athletics does more with less compared to other peer schools, the faculty union just likes to pull this media tantrum every few years.

In a perfect world, there would be some sort of limited revenue sharing between the power and non-power schools in D1, because I think the power schools do need the UNI's of the world, but I doubt that will happen.

The Board of Regents needs to decide if they want UNI to be a successful university, and if so, fund it appropriately - knowing athletics are necessary and they will never have the TV revenue Iowa and ISU enjoy.

Does UNI really need football to be successful as a university? It has a pretty nice niche with education. It produces most teachers in the state of Iowa.
 
Does UNI really need football to be successful as a university? It has a pretty nice niche with education. It produces most teachers in the state of Iowa.
I think it does. Football still connects the alumni to campus and it's integrated into the coaching/athletic director training part of the education curriculum. Even just the marching band itself is a huge part of the music education program.

And it sends a lot of money back across Hudson Rd. in the way of scholarship money (the Faculty never seem to talk about that).

Also, imagine the UNI-Dome without football on campus. We would have the world's largest indoor track facility. It would be a constant reminder of failure and doom.

Non-scholarship FCS or cutting football totally can work for some of the smaller private D1 schools like Drake, Bradley, Evansville, Valpo, etc. But for a public university that tries to have 5 figure enrollment, you need scholarship football.
 
I think it does. Football still connects the alumni to campus and it's integrated into the coaching/athletic director training part of the education curriculum. Even just the marching band itself is a huge part of the music education program.

And it sends a lot of money back across Hudson Rd. in the way of scholarship money (the Faculty never seem to talk about that).

Also, imagine the UNI-Dome without football on campus. We would have the world's largest indoor track facility. It would be a constant reminder of failure and doom.

Non-scholarship FCS or cutting football totally can work for some of the smaller private D1 schools like Drake, Bradley, Evansville, Valpo, etc. But for a public university that tries to have 5 figure enrollment, you need scholarship football.
As an NDSU fan, the UNI game used to be the one I looked forward to the most. The Bison tried to emulate UNI when they got into the MVFC, and I don’t think NDSU would have had the success they’ve had without UNI.
 
I think it does. Football still connects the alumni to campus and it's integrated into the coaching/athletic director training part of the education curriculum. Even just the marching band itself is a huge part of the music education program.

And it sends a lot of money back across Hudson Rd. in the way of scholarship money (the Faculty never seem to talk about that).

Also, imagine the UNI-Dome without football on campus. We would have the world's largest indoor track facility. It would be a constant reminder of failure and doom.

Non-scholarship FCS or cutting football totally can work for some of the smaller private D1 schools like Drake, Bradley, Evansville, Valpo, etc. But for a public university that tries to have 5 figure enrollment, you need scholarship football.

Thats a pretty sad commentary on our society then. lol. We need football for education? Jesus.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT