ADVERTISEMENT

Now that Special Counsel John Durham has failed to prove his case in court...

...can we finally be clear of the wack jobs and their "Wait until the Durham report comes in"?
So like we're done with Schiff and Nadler who never even presented a case on collusion with all their "evidence"? I'm sure you were on the edge of your ledge waiting for all those hammers to drop....that didn't. At least there was a case to be made
 
Not surprised at all. When they didn’t allow his text to the FBI to be admitted to court it was all hit over.

The only positive that came out of this is that it is out in the open how the Russian collusion hoax started
Not a hoax.

A sprawling report released Tuesday by a Republican-controlled Senate panel that spent three years investigating Russia’s interference in the 2016 election laid out an extensive web of contacts between Trump campaign advisers and Kremlin officials and other Russians, including at least one intelligence officer and others tied to the country’s spy services.

The report by the Senate Intelligence Committee, totaling nearly 1,000 pages, drew to a close one of the highest-profile congressional investigations in recent memory and could be the last word from an official government inquiry about the expansive Russian campaign to sabotage the 2016 election.

It provided a bipartisan Senate imprimatur for an extraordinary set of facts: The Russian government disrupted an American election to help Mr. Trump become president, Russian intelligence services viewed members of the Trump campaign as easily manipulated, and some of Mr. Trump’s advisers were eager for the help from an American adversary.

The report portrayed a Trump campaign that was stocked with businessmen with no government experience, advisers working at the fringes of the foreign policy establishment and other friends and associates Mr. Trump had accumulated over the years. Campaign figures, the report said, “presented attractive targets for foreign influence, creating notable counterintelligence vulnerabilities.”

Like the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, who released his findings in April 2019, the Senate report did not conclude that the Trump campaign engaged in a coordinated conspiracy with the Russian government — a fact that Republicans seized on to argue that there was “no collusion.”

But the report showed extensive evidence of contacts between Trump campaign advisers and people tied to the Kremlin — including a longstanding associate of the onetime Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, Konstantin V. Kilimnik, whom the report identified as a “Russian intelligence officer.”

The Senate report was the first time the government has identified Mr. Kilimnik as an intelligence officer — Mr. Mueller’s report had labeled him as someone with ties to Russian intelligence. Most of the details about his intelligence background were blacked out in the Senate report.

Mr. Manafort’s willingness to share information with Mr. Kilimnik and others affiliated with the Russian intelligence services “represented a grave counterintelligence threat,” the report said.

Read the rest here:

 
Not surprised at all. When they didn’t allow his text to the FBI to be admitted to court it was all hit over.

The only positive that came out of this is that it is out in the open how the Russian collusion hoax started
Oh sure, go with that rather than the reality that Durham from the beginning was a corrupt partisan hack who had nothing and found nothing.
 
Not a hoax.

A sprawling report released Tuesday by a Republican-controlled Senate panel that spent three years investigating Russia’s interference in the 2016 election laid out an extensive web of contacts between Trump campaign advisers and Kremlin officials and other Russians, including at least one intelligence officer and others tied to the country’s spy services.

The report by the Senate Intelligence Committee, totaling nearly 1,000 pages, drew to a close one of the highest-profile congressional investigations in recent memory and could be the last word from an official government inquiry about the expansive Russian campaign to sabotage the 2016 election.

It provided a bipartisan Senate imprimatur for an extraordinary set of facts: The Russian government disrupted an American election to help Mr. Trump become president, Russian intelligence services viewed members of the Trump campaign as easily manipulated, and some of Mr. Trump’s advisers were eager for the help from an American adversary.

The report portrayed a Trump campaign that was stocked with businessmen with no government experience, advisers working at the fringes of the foreign policy establishment and other friends and associates Mr. Trump had accumulated over the years. Campaign figures, the report said, “presented attractive targets for foreign influence, creating notable counterintelligence vulnerabilities.”

Like the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, who released his findings in April 2019, the Senate report did not conclude that the Trump campaign engaged in a coordinated conspiracy with the Russian government — a fact that Republicans seized on to argue that there was “no collusion.”

But the report showed extensive evidence of contacts between Trump campaign advisers and people tied to the Kremlin — including a longstanding associate of the onetime Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, Konstantin V. Kilimnik, whom the report identified as a “Russian intelligence officer.”

The Senate report was the first time the government has identified Mr. Kilimnik as an intelligence officer — Mr. Mueller’s report had labeled him as someone with ties to Russian intelligence. Most of the details about his intelligence background were blacked out in the Senate report.

Mr. Manafort’s willingness to share information with Mr. Kilimnik and others affiliated with the Russian intelligence services “represented a grave counterintelligence threat,” the report said.


Read the rest here:

But Durham has receipts. Checkmate libturd!
 
That’s not a conspiracy. Observation of separate facts. Quit calling facts conspiracies. It’s the new liberal fad.
Why didn't those jurors get removed? Same with the judge. Anything verifiable as nefarious intent?
Manafort had a couple Trump supporters on his jury. And it didn't seem to matter.
 
God you're stupid

When you take facts and construe them to show something that isn't present, that's literally a conspiracy theory.
How? There’s no conspiracy presented. If the reader gets a conspiracy out of that, they’re pretty wild. Way to go personal AGAIN because that’s all the left has when they’re complete failures.
 
Why didn't those jurors get removed? Same with the judge. Anything verifiable as nefarious intent?
Manafort had a couple Trump supporters on his jury. And it didn't seem to matter.
🚨 goalposts are on the move 🚨
 
How about conservatives start accepting the facts? Which is to say, you didn't have enough facts to prove your case in a court of law, so quit making candy ass excuses as to why the case failed.
Hmm deal. Cons and libs both stfu- including the 1/6 conspiracy nonsense. Oh, bet that one’s ok with you.
 
Since every, single Hillary thing failed... it's back to Hunter Biden.

The Radical Right media is desperate to shift emphasis on grifter Trump or DeathSantis.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sob5
So libs, can you admit that the Trump Russia conspiracy is over? That was proven.
Did you read this post? A bipartisan committee concluded that the Trump campaign shared information with Russia.
Not a hoax.

A sprawling report released Tuesday by a Republican-controlled Senate panel that spent three years investigating Russia’s interference in the 2016 election laid out an extensive web of contacts between Trump campaign advisers and Kremlin officials and other Russians, including at least one intelligence officer and others tied to the country’s spy services.

The report by the Senate Intelligence Committee, totaling nearly 1,000 pages, drew to a close one of the highest-profile congressional investigations in recent memory and could be the last word from an official government inquiry about the expansive Russian campaign to sabotage the 2016 election.

It provided a bipartisan Senate imprimatur for an extraordinary set of facts: The Russian government disrupted an American election to help Mr. Trump become president, Russian intelligence services viewed members of the Trump campaign as easily manipulated, and some of Mr. Trump’s advisers were eager for the help from an American adversary.

The report portrayed a Trump campaign that was stocked with businessmen with no government experience, advisers working at the fringes of the foreign policy establishment and other friends and associates Mr. Trump had accumulated over the years. Campaign figures, the report said, “presented attractive targets for foreign influence, creating notable counterintelligence vulnerabilities.”

Like the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, who released his findings in April 2019, the Senate report did not conclude that the Trump campaign engaged in a coordinated conspiracy with the Russian government — a fact that Republicans seized on to argue that there was “no collusion.”

But the report showed extensive evidence of contacts between Trump campaign advisers and people tied to the Kremlin — including a longstanding associate of the onetime Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, Konstantin V. Kilimnik, whom the report identified as a “Russian intelligence officer.”

The Senate report was the first time the government has identified Mr. Kilimnik as an intelligence officer — Mr. Mueller’s report had labeled him as someone with ties to Russian intelligence. Most of the details about his intelligence background were blacked out in the Senate report.

Mr. Manafort’s willingness to share information with Mr. Kilimnik and others affiliated with the Russian intelligence services “represented a grave counterintelligence threat,” the report said.


Read the rest here:

 
I think my orignal question has been answered, and sadly so.
Cons let this die. Libs let stupid 1/6 Tom Clancy novel end, come out and admit it’s a bunch of theater, both move on- one side denounces trump, the other admits Biden is a puppet with deteriorating mental capacity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: biggreydogs
So no you still believe it. Lol keep it up it’s adorable and entertaining
Yes, I believe the report written by the intelligence committee which included these Republicans:

Here is the actual report:
 
I just love it when people quote so-called authorities like Charlie Kirk who never even completed a single semester of the community college he started and dropped out of, He’s never had a real job in his life, never invented anything or created anything of value other than hustled as a corporate fascist puppet, a psyops shill and hate monger and nothing more.

trolls and trumpists love the guy though! What a hero!
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT