what percentage of their funding does NPR get from the government?
The point is that whatever that percentage is should be reduced to zero.
what percentage of their funding does NPR get from the government?
Because you don't agree with their content?The point is that whatever that percentage is should be reduced to zero.
From your same source;
And this: one of the very best.
Because I don't think the government should be funding an entity that pushes an unbiased narrative. That enters the realm of government propaganda.Because you don't agree with their content?
So. You are nutz. Newsmax for you? Edit: Is it propaganda when Republicans are in charge?Because I don't think the government should be funding an entity that pushes an unbiased narrative. That enters the realm of government propaganda.
Newsmax is a publicly funded entity?So. You are nutz. Newsmax for you? Edit: Is it propaganda when Republicans are in charge?
Did I say that. It appears you are a far-righter that only believes in "YOUR" news. Everything else is fake.Newsmax is a publicly funded entity?
Did I say that. It appears you are a far-righter that only believes in "YOUR" news. Everything else is fake.
I am talking about your news source. Follow along.I said I wasn't for tax dollars going to an entity that spewed biased news stories.
You responded with "Newsmax for you?"
I, wondering what the connection between government-funded entities and Newsmax was responded "Newsmax is a publicly funded entity?"
Above is your response.
I try not to say derogatory comments on this board, so I'll just respond "Good bye."
He is on FOX. FOX self admitted declaration they present false stories and narratives so anyone who is on the network can not be used for truthfulnessJoe Concha is a media and politics columnist and a Fox News contributor.
He is on FOX. FOX self admitted declaration they present false stories and narratives so anyone who is on the network can not be used for truthfulness
it’s all lies. Just ask the CEO. Why should I or anyone else for that matter waste their time.Did you find anything to be untrue?
I'm not OK with it as it is a great use of funds. My point, that everyone but you can see, is that that funding is minimal.To be clear, you're ok with a stop in funding for NPR, correct?
Actually the point is its almost zero so the kids would be minimal.The point is that whatever that percentage is should be reduced to zero.
You believe the government should be finding biased narratives? LOLBecause I don't think the government should be funding an entity that pushes an unbiased narrative. That enters the realm of government propaganda.
No, you didn't. LolI said I wasn't for tax dollars going to an entity that spewed biased news stories.
I'm not OK with it as it is a great use of funds. My point, that everyone but you can see, is that that funding is minimal.
You, stating this?? BWAAAAAAHAHAHA!You don't know whether you're coming or going.
Just be consistent.
BBC is pretty goodThe problem is that NPR shouldn't be political when politicians are giving them money.
In any event, the BBC is the only news source I trust.