No wait, I think the projected savings are almost as much is the Obamas spend annually on vacations.
Here's one I haven't researched and frankly I don't understand.
The Lefties say BHO has done an incredible job of reducing the annual deficit but the folks at Fox say BHO has added more to the national debt than all previous Presidents combined.
Who's not telling the truth? Can anyone explain this?
Obummer has added more to the National Debt than any other President.
What's the question??
Another Funny one, I saw this week, is this: In like 1992, Barney Sanders was ranting about the National Debt being over $3 trillion dollars.......and now it's $19 mil. Lefties are such hypocrites, who will use anything to keep their hands on power.......disgusting
Another Funny one, I saw this week, is this: In like 1992, Barney Sanders was ranting about the National Debt being over $3 trillion dollars.......and now it's $19 mil.
We'll just print more money!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
![]()
Shit, you don't even have to print it anymore. You just create a bank account and type in some numbers.
Virtually all growth in money comes from the banking system and it is not from printed paper. On top of that, something like 90% of all printed currency from the US is actually outside the US borders and is used as the world currency.We'll just print more money!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
![]()
Raise your hands, all of you that knew of Gitmo before the Iraq war. And have we ever before kept prisoners that long without trials? Or POWs without repatriation? Which are they? Someone should decide.Kind of a disconnect - the politicians that brag about how tough America is are the same people who are afraid to bring captured combatants, not even necessarily terrorists, to maximum security cells in the US. Supposedly the existence of the camp is also a recruiting tool for terrorists and a black mark against the US for much of the rest of the world.
Raise your hands, all of you that knew of Gitmo before the Iraq war. And have we ever before kept prisoners that long without trials? Or POWs without repatriation? Which are they? Someone should decide.
Raise your hands, all of you that knew of Gitmo before the Iraq war. And have we ever before kept prisoners that long without trials? Or POWs without repatriation? Which are they? Someone should decide.
No, we used to just summarily try and execute them.
http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/german-saboteurs-executed-in-washington
https://www.washingtonpost.com/loca...7614d4-1905-11e5-ab92-c75ae6ab94b5_story.html
Yes - but is it really 'battle' if you are killed without warning? It's like turning on the light and smashing a cockroach - the bug never saw it coming.Interesting point but there's a difference between battle and execution isn't there?
Yes - but is it really 'battle' if you are killed without warning? It's like turning on the light and smashing a cockroach - the bug never saw it coming
I wonder how we would react if some country was launching drone strikes against our generals' houses in Virginia?
I'm not sure how cheating is part of the equation. Obviously all sides were dropping bombs at extraordinary rates in WWII.You mean the A Bomb on Japan was cheating?
To be clear, that was a result of Washington's meddling in their affairs 1st.Or flying commercial aircraft into our skyscrapers!!
To be clear, that was a result of Washington's meddling in their affairs 1st.
and we are not even 100% sure anybody "flew" anything anywhereTo be clear, that was a result of Washington's meddling in their affairs 1st.
All holograms right?and we are not even 100% sure anybody "flew" anything anywhere
possibly, or drones, so that would mean no pilots. {or the planes taken over by remote control} we are never 100% sure who did it and we never will knowAll holograms right?