ADVERTISEMENT

Oil falls below $100, stocks climb as traders track war, new covid lockdowns in China

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
78,191
60,098
113
Oil prices swung lower Tuesday and U.S. stocks rallied in morning trading as investors reckoned with renewed coronavirus lockdowns in China and more cease-fire talks between Russia and Ukraine against an increasingly battle-scarred backdrop.

Several of China’s industrial hubs have been hit with business and travel restrictions as the country grapples with its worst coronavirus outbreak since 2020, with daily cases doubling on Tuesday, according to Chinese authorities. The resurgence, in a country that has taken a “zero tolerance” approach to the virus, has sparked fears of major slowdown in one of the world’s biggest economic engines, as well as worries about an even more snarled global supply chain.
For the first time in about two weeks, oil prices were trading below $100 per barrel. Brent crude, the international benchmark, shed more than 7.8 percent to roughly $98.50 per barrel. West Texas Intermediate crude, the U.S. benchmark, was trading 8.2 percent lower, around $94.50.







“The resurgence in cases has provided a stark reminder that the pandemic is still lingering,” Russ Mould, investment director at AJ Bell, said Tuesday in comments emailed to The Washington Post. “Investors might have become too complacent over the risks of lockdowns returning once again.”

Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index cratered more than 5.7 percent in its worst close since 2016, while the Shanghai Composite closed nearly 5 percent lower.
Despite the tensions, U.S. stocks climbed in morning trading. Around 11:30 a.m., the Dow Jones industrial average had risen more than 350 points, or 1.1 percent. The S&P 500 had gained nearly 1.5 percent, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq advanced more than 2 percent.

European indexes were broadly negative in midday trading, with the benchmark Stoxx 600 index sliding 1 percent.


Markets loathe uncertainty, but uncertainty has been inescapable thus far in 2022. Aside from the maelstrom of covid complications, the war in Ukraine and the cascade of sanctions it set off are also colliding with inflation that had already surged to its highest level in 40 years before the invasion. Households and companies have been confronting price increases along every step of the supply chain and checkout counter.
The slide in oil prices did little to relieve the pressure for consumers at the pump. The U.S. average for a gallon of gas was $4.31 on Tuesday, near records highs and up more than 80 cents from a month ago according to data from AAA.

Wayne Wicker, chief investment officer at MissionSquare Retirement, said that the rally Tuesday likely reflects the impacts of short-term trading as investors take advantage of recent sell-offs.






“Despite today’s strong start, I believe that we will continue to have a number of factors weighing on the investors,” Wicker told The Post. “Until we gain some clarity on the geo-political issues affecting Europe as well as the trends in inflation and interest rates, we will most likely have more volatility in global markets over the next few months.”
Geopolitical tensions are usually shrugged off by investors, but the Ukraine crisis is weighing heavily on the markets because of Russia’s central role as a global energy producer. Russia produces about 10 percent of the world’s oil supply, on par with the United States and Saudi Arabia, and surging energy costs will ripple quickly through the economy, adding heat to already fiery inflation.

Cboe’s volatility index, known as “Wall Street’s fear gauge” is up nearly 50 percent in the past 3 months according to MarketWatch.






Investors are focused on the Federal Reserve’s meeting, which begins Tuesday, for signs of how far the central bank will go in raising its key interest rate, its primary weapon against inflation. The increase would be the Fed’s first after two years of highly accommodative monetary policy in the pandemic.
Ivan Feinseth, chief investment officer at Tigress Financial Partners, said that Russia’s war with Ukraine has “massively disrupted the U.S. and global economy” and is complicating “what would have been a positive monetary trend” to start raise rates against a backdrop of strong employment gains and consumer demand.
Now, Feinseth said Tuesday in comments emailed to The Post, the Fed must weigh the fallout from the war against “the potential for higher rates to further disrupt and not moderate an economic recovery.”

 
The zero tolerance approach is going to bite China in the ass,.. I think covid demands a certain amount of pain and China's tab is due.
 
The zero tolerance approach is going to bite China in the ass,.. I think covid demands a certain amount of pain and China's tab is due.
Who is going to force China to stay open? If they stay open and feel the wrath of covid then the rest of the world does just as much as if they shutdown probably more as covid spreads vs localized shutdowns. That is until we are no longer dependent on Chinese manufacturing.
 
Who is going to force China to stay open? If they stay open and feel the wrath of covid then the rest of the world does just as much as if they shutdown probably more as covid spreads vs localized shutdowns. That is until we are no longer dependent on Chinese manufacturing.

Nobody, and it doesn't matter when or how quickly they process the pain of covid,.. It's in front of them and they will have to eventually consume all of it.
 
Remember when Cuomo let all of the old sick people back into homes, killing everyone, and you screamed about Trump "Having blood on his hands." Good times.
It is what it is? I take no responsibility? That dumb****. That isn't remotely an accurate comparison to anything here but that is your style and how you roll.
 
Who said anything about Biden. You’re injecting politics into a discussion where it isn’t just to start arguments, the same arguments that occur daily.
I am providing you what all elected Iowa Republicans and the RNC chairwoman tweet out daily so it is 100% lies and politics to them so Biden is blamed. What aren't you grasping here?
 
I am providing you what all elected Iowa Republicans and the RNC chairwoman tweet out daily so it is 100% lies and politics to them so Biden is blamed. What aren't you grasping here?
Not grasping your need to start the same argument daily.
 
It is what it is? I take no responsibility? That dumb****. That isn't remotely an accurate comparison to anything here but that is your style and how you roll.
Biden is literally in the midst of his "I take no responsibility" moment. And he's employing idiot Tic Tockers to serve as his messengers.

So far, according to him, Psaki and you, he's had nothing to do with: the border mess, the shitty Afghan pullout, inflation, gas prices, Putin's aggression, supply issues, crime, COVID deaths and any of the other shit you'd be freaking out about if it was 2019. How else could he be the best since Lincoln, though?
 
Remember when Cuomo let all of the old sick people back into homes, killing everyone, and you screamed about Trump "Having blood on his hands." Good times.
Well, in Chris’s defense, Trump was a bumbling oaf who actually mused about the possible efficacy of ingesting disinfectant.

But, yes, the president often gets too much blame or credit for these types of things.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Not grasping your need to start the same argument daily.
I haven't said a word about gas prices. I am stating what they are doing. It is why 70% of people think Biden is handling gas prices wrong when it 100% is a global issue/Putin/price gouging. Thanks.
 
I am. I stated facts. Decipher them over this silly phrase.
What you don’t seem to grasp is capriciously blaming the man in the Oval Office is a two-way street. If Trump had won a second term, you would have started over fifty “f#ck this f#cking pos desecration” threads when gas prices started skyrocketing.

That is FAUlty’s one and only point. And he’s correct.

Relax, Chris.
 
  • Like
Reactions: schraderj
And the usual suspects will have at least twenty “Biden-gas-inflation” threads up and running before noon on the day it does.

Um…..inflation is and has been super high for several months. Oil prices may be back up past where they were in like a week or two
 
Um…..inflation is and has been super high for several months. Oil prices may be back up past where they were in like a week or two
Yes, and what policies enacted under the Biden administration led to this level of inflation? Or were there other extenuating factors that might better explain the trend? 🤔
 
And yet deficit spending went down in 2021. (And was still awful.)

That’s because the all-time record for deficit spending ($3.13 trillion) occurred in 2020.

F#cking Obama.
Trad and now Obama, you starting to Jones for a 🚬 yet??


Want to make a fun wager on who holds that title by 2024?
 
Yes, and what policies enacted under the Biden administration led to this level of inflation? Or were there other extenuating factors that might better explain the trend? 🤔

You do understand the more money you artificially inflate the economy with that your currency becomes devalued?

What were the extenuating circumstances?
 
Want to make a fun wager on who holds that title by 2024?
Over the last forty years, deficit spending has generally been the worst under Republican presidencies. I don’t see the Biden administration ramming through a bunch of reckless tax breaks and with the midterms coming up and enough fiscally responsible Dems in Congress, I might be willing to take that bet. 🤔
 
You do understand the more money you artificially inflate the economy with that your currency becomes devalued?

What were the extenuating circumstances?
People REALLY needed that third stimulus package to get them through a pandemic that became second page news the day Russia decided to start a fight with its ex wife. Where would we be without the 1.2 trillion that WAS PAID TO CHINA for test to see if people had a bug with equal severity to the flu. Speaking of kits, hooe you got your substance abuse kit. And boy o boy did we pass that infrastructure bill, something that could be considered a giant win, if they would actually show us how thr money is improving our infrastructure and not just TALKING about how great it would be.





At least the stripper has a false sense of worth after spring break.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crafty Beaver
People REALLY needed that third stimulus package to get them through a pandemic that became second page news the day Russia decided to start a fight with its ex wife. Where would we be without the 1.2 trillion that WAS PAID TO CHINA for test to see if people had a bug with equal severity to the flu. Speaking of kits, hooe you got your substance abuse kit. And boy o boy did we pass that infrastructure bill, something that could be considered a giant win, if they would actually show us how thr money is improving our infrastructure and not just TALKING about how great it would be.





At least the stripper has a false sense of worth after spring break.
Didn’t Trump push for that full $2,000?

You and swag are on Chris-level thinking. Fiscal irresponsibility is a two-way street.
 
  • Like
Reactions: globalhawk
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT