fleming24, what about the Dual Impact Index? No mention of it in your post...
Thanks.....appreciate it.
WOW....P4P has Brandon #1 with Dieringer #2. Nice. Then Brooks #9, Clark #16, Stoll #35, Gilman #37, and Burak #74. Meyer at #124.
125-#3, 133-#2, 141-#49,149-#1 157-#19, 165-?? Couldn't find Rhoads listed anywhere SHP. 174-#11, 184-#2, 197-#7, 285-#5
OOPS-Just found Rhoads listed under "Not Enough Matches"
I don't see how any ranking system could have Brooks at #9 P4P. In my mind, he's no better than the #11 184-pounder.
Good to hear. FWIW I quoted the wrong post. Although it was my own humorous quip at SHP's computer rankings, it was meant in direct reapose to "WOW....P4P has Brandon #1 with Dieringer #2. Nice. Then Brooks #9, Clark #16, Stoll #35, Gilman #37, and Burak #74. Meyer at #124"Classy PapaBearSLIM. I'll just reserve myself to zipping the lip. Good Luck to you and the Gophers.
I assume you used #11 because Brooks beat the #12 guy in this ranking (Nick Gravina) fairly handily (11-5), and two days before that same #12 guy beat #7 (and All-American, if you'd rather go by performance in a prior year) Tim Dudley.I don't see how any ranking system could have Brooks at #9 P4P. In my mind, he's no better than the #11 184-pounder.
SHP - WWDM made that reference in jest due to Brooks being ranked as the #12 wrestler at 184 in a recent ranking.I assume you used #11 because Brooks beat the #12 guy in this ranking (Nick Gravina) fairly handily (11-5), and two days before that same #12 guy beat #7 (and All-American, if you'd rather go by performance in a prior year) Tim Dudley.
Dang...missed that one.SHP - WWDM made that reference in jest due to Brooks being ranked as the #12 wrestler at 184 in a recent ranking.
It's the criteria Seton Hall Pirate has established that's very close to form. I hope you're not serious WWDMHawkeye. If so, shame on you.