ADVERTISEMENT

Opinion: Biden lowers the hammer on Russia, just as he vowed

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
78,325
60,350
113
By Jennifer Rubin
Columnist |

Today at 6:32 p.m. EST


You could feel President Biden’s indignation as he announced on Tuesday that he would make good on his vow to enact crippling sanctions on Russia for its invasion of Ukraine.
“Who in the Lord’s name does [Russian President Vladimir] Putin think gives him the right to declare new so-called countries on territory that belong to his neighbors?” Biden asked. He quickly answered his own question: “This is a flagrant violation of international law and demands a firm response from the international community.”
Opinions to start the day, in your inbox. Sign up.
Biden made clear that while Putin has hit the trip wire for sanctions, his invasion is just starting. “To put it simply, Russia just announced it is carving out a big part of Ukraine,” he said, adding, “He’s setting up a rationale to take more territory by force.”

Biden then announced the toughest sanctions in history against Putin’s regime, including measures to block companies from doing businesses with two large Russian financial institutions, VEB and the country’s military bank; cut off the country from international financing; impose restrictions on Russian oligarchs and their families; and push Germany to halt certification of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline.






“The United States will continue to provide defensive assistance to Ukraine in the meantime,” Biden said. “And we’ll continue to reinforce and reassure our NATO allies.” Look for additional forces to shore up NATO’s eastern flank.


The Nord Stream 2 cutoff, in particular, never would have happened without the Biden’s team’s persistence, given the resistance from Germany. Despite sniping from Biden’s critics that the president had not achieved unity, this was a powerful demonstration that even our most reluctant partners on sanctions were fully on board. As Alina Polyakova, head of the Center for European Policy Analysis, put it: “The Biden Administration has done an impressive diplomatic job coordinating the allies.”

Reaction to the sanctions was overwhelmingly positive in foreign policy circles, even among staunch Russia hawks. Ian Bremmer of the Eurasia Group observed that “today’s [U.S./European Union] sanctions on Russia are significant and — most importantly — unified.” He added that “if Putin thought his speech yesterday would drive a spike in the NATO alliance, he was seriously mistaken.”


Michael McFaul, a former U.S. ambassador to Russia, was succinct on Twitter: “I applaud the new sanctions just announced.” Polyakova deemed the actions “a solid step.”
Meanwhile, former secretary of state Mike Pompeo — who just a few days ago despicably praised Putin as “very shrewd" and “capable,” adding that he has “enormous respect" for the Russian dictator — took time out to rail against Biden for showing “enormous weakness.”

And judging from the initial snarky tweets and whining that the sanctions were insufficient, MAGA Republicans seem disinclined to stop partisan swipes at Biden. Nor will they repudiate their support for his predecessor, who continued to swoon over Putin on Tuesday, calling his invasion “genius.” (Recall, this is the former president who sided with Putin over U.S. intelligence on 2016 election interference; wanted to readmit Russia to the Group of Seven; echoed Kremlin propaganda about Crimea; and gave away code-word-protected secrets to the Russians in the Oval Office.) So much for “America first.”


This is a defining moment for Biden, NATO and a rules-based international order. It will determine whether the West has the fortitude to defend its principles. It will also test Republicans to see whether they can finally wean themselves from the increasingly anti-American former president and support Biden during the most acute international crisis since the end of the Cold War.
So far, the West is performing well. The Republicans? Not at all.

 
By Jennifer Rubin
Columnist |

Today at 6:32 p.m. EST


You could feel President Biden’s indignation as he announced on Tuesday that he would make good on his vow to enact crippling sanctions on Russia for its invasion of Ukraine.
“Who in the Lord’s name does [Russian President Vladimir] Putin think gives him the right to declare new so-called countries on territory that belong to his neighbors?” Biden asked. He quickly answered his own question: “This is a flagrant violation of international law and demands a firm response from the international community.”
Opinions to start the day, in your inbox. Sign up.
Biden made clear that while Putin has hit the trip wire for sanctions, his invasion is just starting. “To put it simply, Russia just announced it is carving out a big part of Ukraine,” he said, adding, “He’s setting up a rationale to take more territory by force.”

Biden then announced the toughest sanctions in history against Putin’s regime, including measures to block companies from doing businesses with two large Russian financial institutions, VEB and the country’s military bank; cut off the country from international financing; impose restrictions on Russian oligarchs and their families; and push Germany to halt certification of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline.






“The United States will continue to provide defensive assistance to Ukraine in the meantime,” Biden said. “And we’ll continue to reinforce and reassure our NATO allies.” Look for additional forces to shore up NATO’s eastern flank.


The Nord Stream 2 cutoff, in particular, never would have happened without the Biden’s team’s persistence, given the resistance from Germany. Despite sniping from Biden’s critics that the president had not achieved unity, this was a powerful demonstration that even our most reluctant partners on sanctions were fully on board. As Alina Polyakova, head of the Center for European Policy Analysis, put it: “The Biden Administration has done an impressive diplomatic job coordinating the allies.”

Reaction to the sanctions was overwhelmingly positive in foreign policy circles, even among staunch Russia hawks. Ian Bremmer of the Eurasia Group observed that “today’s [U.S./European Union] sanctions on Russia are significant and — most importantly — unified.” He added that “if Putin thought his speech yesterday would drive a spike in the NATO alliance, he was seriously mistaken.”


Michael McFaul, a former U.S. ambassador to Russia, was succinct on Twitter: “I applaud the new sanctions just announced.” Polyakova deemed the actions “a solid step.”
Meanwhile, former secretary of state Mike Pompeo — who just a few days ago despicably praised Putin as “very shrewd" and “capable,” adding that he has “enormous respect" for the Russian dictator — took time out to rail against Biden for showing “enormous weakness.”

And judging from the initial snarky tweets and whining that the sanctions were insufficient, MAGA Republicans seem disinclined to stop partisan swipes at Biden. Nor will they repudiate their support for his predecessor, who continued to swoon over Putin on Tuesday, calling his invasion “genius.” (Recall, this is the former president who sided with Putin over U.S. intelligence on 2016 election interference; wanted to readmit Russia to the Group of Seven; echoed Kremlin propaganda about Crimea; and gave away code-word-protected secrets to the Russians in the Oval Office.) So much for “America first.”


This is a defining moment for Biden, NATO and a rules-based international order. It will determine whether the West has the fortitude to defend its principles. It will also test Republicans to see whether they can finally wean themselves from the increasingly anti-American former president and support Biden during the most acute international crisis since the end of the Cold War.
So far, the West is performing well. The Republicans? Not at all.

Russia will continue to ramp up the invasion of Ukraine and thus Biden has done nothing to deter them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: red/green hawk
Russia will continue to ramp up the invasion of Ukraine and thus Biden has done nothing to deter them.
Did your parents have any kids that lived?

@Auger - “The Nord Stream 2 cutoff, in particular, never would have happened without the Biden’s team’s persistence, given the resistance from Germany. Despite sniping from Biden’s critics that the president had not achieved unity, this was a powerful demonstration that even our most reluctant partners on sanctions were fully on board. As Alina Polyakova, head of the Center for European Policy Analysis, put it: “The Biden Administration has done an impressive diplomatic job coordinating the allies.”
 
Our basement dummy wants to start WWIII, and he won’t even take a question.

What a worthless coward.
 
Once the sanctions deter Putin, then they are considered to work. That being said, what makes Putin’s objective fail?
 
The hammer - hah. Just like he told Vlad he would? "Thanks for the heads up, Joe"

What would be the point of surprise economic sanctions? This stuff is just as much about coalition building and fostering desent at home as it is about anything else. The Russian oligarchy isn't naive, I would imagine they're financially situated to weather a storm such as this.
 
You'd eat your own shit if the White House told you to.
66b6u9.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: ParkerHawk
The hammer - hah. Just like he told Vlad he would? "Thanks for the heads up, Joe"
LOL...this is a dumb take even from you. What else do you think a POTUS could pull out of the bag that would "surprise" Putin? Sanctions. Military response. What else? Try to respond on point since you seem to know something.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Did your parents have any kids that lived?

@Auger - “The Nord Stream 2 cutoff, in particular, never would have happened without the Biden’s team’s persistence, given the resistance from Germany. Despite sniping from Biden’s critics that the president had not achieved unity, this was a powerful demonstration that even our most reluctant partners on sanctions were fully on board. As Alina Polyakova, head of the Center for European Policy Analysis, put it: “The Biden Administration has done an impressive diplomatic job coordinating the allies.”
You have people from both the left and right calling the sanctions weak and not enough. Russia will get everything they want in the end. Also the Nord Stream 2 sanctions aren't going to make much of a difference. The pipeline isn't scheduled to begin operating until the end of the summer. Nothing has been done to prolong that opening. I will not be shocked to see sanctions lifted by then and the pipeline to begin operating on time like nothing happened.

Why were there no sanctions before Russia invaded? We had two months of hype and no strong stance from Biden or the EU. Russia invaded and Biden and the EU failed to deter aggression. They are losing this battle and now prices will rise and cost Americans $$. Biden and the EU are batting 0 right now. Not sure how anyone in the US or EU can claim any victory right now? How far back will the red line be pushed?
 
Are you serious?
That's the question Zelensky asked a few days ago when he traveled to the Munich conference. If we were so sure of Russia's invasion, why wouldn't NATO or Biden levy sanctions as a deterrent, if they were going to be so "crippling" as suggested. Why is that a bad question?
 
That's the question Zelensky asked a few days ago when he traveled to the Munich conference. If we were so sure of Russia's invasion, why wouldn't NATO or Biden levy sanctions as a deterrent, if they were going to be so "crippling" as suggested. Why is that a bad question?
Remember when the administration was asked if they were waiting for Putin to make a move before they acted…
 
  • Like
Reactions: Auger
That's the question Zelensky asked a few days ago when he traveled to the Munich conference. If we were so sure of Russia's invasion, why wouldn't NATO or Biden levy sanctions as a deterrent, if they were going to be so "crippling" as suggested. Why is that a bad question?
I expected this out of you. Zelensky is in over his head and flailing. It was an idiotic thing for him to say.

But I was asking Auger.
 
That's the question Zelensky asked a few days ago when he traveled to the Munich conference. If we were so sure of Russia's invasion, why wouldn't NATO or Biden levy sanctions as a deterrent, if they were going to be so "crippling" as suggested. Why is that a bad question?
Because the US was still trying to avoid this conflict via diplomacy. The US would lose its leverage and the narrative if it engaged in anticipatory sanctions when Russia hadn't gone on the offensive and was still engaged in "training exercises," (a cover that several posters on this board believed to be true and blamed the US for ratcheting up the conflict). Instituting anticipatory sanctions would have given Putin the excuse to invade as a righteous act, which would have had an adverse affect on world opinion on the action. Moreover, Biden was doing to careful dance of trying to lineup all of the allies--including the all important commitment from Germany to not open the valves on Nord 2. Had the US been seen as the aggressor here, there is a good chance of a fracture with Nato allies, as well as other important participants in this event.
 
  • Like
Reactions: steelhawkeye
2014: Russia invades Crimea and Obama and Biden let him.
2022: Russia invades Ukraine and Biden and what's-her-name let him.

Why didn't he do anything in between those years? Hmmmmmmmmmmm........
 
  • Like
Reactions: DogBoyRy
Are you serious?
Oh yeah dead serious. You have several top foreign policy experts on both sides asking the same question. Why was everyone waiting for Russia to make the first move? Once a nation does invade their not going to lay of the gas. The sanctions post invasion have done nothing to deter Russia. Experts are even saying an invasion plus now sanctions will impact Americans more than Russians. Biden was playing with an empty hand. His strategy is being ripped all over the world on both sides. Obviously its failing. His job was to prevent an invasion. Just like his job was to prevent Afghanistan from falling apart the way it did before we had all of our assets taken care of. The guy is a disaster at foreign policy. He should have never lifted the Nord Stream 2 sanctions Trump imposed. Instead he was a pushover for both the EU and Russia. America last with Biden.
 
Because the US was still trying to avoid this conflict via diplomacy. The US would lose its leverage and the narrative if it engaged in anticipatory sanctions when Russia hadn't gone on the offensive and was still engaged in "training exercises," (a cover that several posters on this board believed to be true and blamed the US for ratcheting up the conflict). Instituting anticipatory sanctions would have given Putin the excuse to invade as a righteous act, which would have had an adverse affect on world opinion on the action. Moreover, Biden was doing to careful dance of trying to lineup all of the allies--including the all important commitment from Germany to not open the valves on Nord 2. Had the US been seen as the aggressor here, there is a good chance of a fracture with Nato allies, as well as other important participants in this event.
The valves to Nord Stream 2 aren't scheduled to open until late summer no matter any sanctions to freeze them. It would not shock me if sanctions are lifted by then and the pipeline flows on time as scheduled but the narrative will be the EU and Biden were tough on Russia with the sanctions.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT