I think as long as he and his wife stay healthy, he'll go to 70.Very true and Penn state did it through very adverse situations. I agree its KFs ball to call, how long do you think he wants to stick around?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think as long as he and his wife stay healthy, he'll go to 70.Very true and Penn state did it through very adverse situations. I agree its KFs ball to call, how long do you think he wants to stick around?
otoh, I don't like it simply from the optics and the timing. I don't want to give the appearance of lending credence to any of the accusations that have been made.
of course some, if not most, of the accusations are true. and all should be taken into account... that doesn't mean you have to act on all of them. from what we've learned most of them were related to one person and mainly because he was a giant d and not because of flat out racial bias. most of the complaints were minor at worst; earrings and hats, music in the weight room.OTOH, the accusations may have been true and Ferentz made a smart and courageous move to address problems that were there. I think he made the program stronger and I'd like to see him move it on. I admire what he did.
And really, if we didn't hang out on HR, the optics have faded and people have moved on to other shiny things.
Exactly, and furthermore. If your going to push out the winningest coach in school history, and top five in BIG history, (while he has the program humming), what exactly does that say to potencial new hires? Either that KF is guilty and needs to go, which is a bad look and probably overblown, or that we'd be willing to throw him out with the bath water. Either way this would not be good optics for whomever might consider the job.I don't think the OP understands what the term rebuild means. Or else he has a very different definition. We are coming off a 10 win season. Have been incredibly consistent. If we were to replace Kirk or were he to leave, it would not be a rebuild job if/when someone comes in.
No it is not. It is inevitable in every program that a new coach will someday come in but I do not feel that time is for several years. This program will never be able to compete with the Alabamas, Clemson and Ohio States for the type of athletes required to run certain schemes, Iowa is far more competitive when it recognizes this and sticks to what it does well. Look at Wisconsin. They have had three Coaches in Beliema, Andersen and Cyrst without deviating from what they do well. I do not think this has stopped BF from becoming HC, but it has delayed it.The change is coming at some point though, wouldn't it make sense to do it when you have a full year? You are just kind of delaying the inevitable right?
We have hired 2 guys in the last 40 years. The "coaching carousel" or "what it says" after 20 years seems a bit overblown to me. The coaches understand this is a business also and while he may have racked up a bunch of wins he has certainly had the time to do it also.Exactly, and furthermore. If your going to push out the winningest coach in school history, and top five in BIG history, (while he has the program humming), what exactly does that say to potencial new hires? Either that KF is guilty and needs to go, which is a bad look and probably overblown, or that we'd be willing to throw him out with the bath water. Either way this would not be good optics for whomever might consider the job.
Remember when they changed from the 4-3 to the 3-4? Sure "they are huge and run the ball" looks similar but they have changed through the years.No it is not. It is inevitable in every program that a new coach will someday come in but I do not feel that time is for several years. This program will never be able to compete with the Alabamas, Clemson and Ohio States for the type of athletes required to run certain schemes, Iowa is far more competitive when it recognizes this and sticks to what it does well. Look at Wisconsin. They have had three Coaches in Beliema, Andersen and Cyrst without deviating from what they do well. I do not think this has stopped BF from becoming HC, but it has delayed it.
Talking with a fellow board member last night and we are both in agreement that it doesn't seem likely we will have football this year. So I presented this:
We know KF has a handful of years left with the program in the best of circumstances, he and I are in agreement BF sunk his bid to be the next HC so realiatically you are talking about a total rebuild. If we skip '20 instead of having an off year and then going through a rebuild in 3-4 years just take the lump now during a year of no football and create the easiest transition possible. What say you? If there is no football in '20 would it be a bad idea to blow it up and start over in the year off?
Edit* Oil brought up a good point early in this convo. Im talking about a staff rebuild here. We ARE in a great place from a roster standpoint which would help transition the new coach. We dont have to find ourselves in a "bare cupboard" situation.[/
Yes he and i were enjoying a couple brews while talking.Are you guys drunk or are you just two dumb ashes***?(just razzing ya) The program is doing good now and getting better. Let me quess..... we can get Bob Stoops right? Why do you think the grass is greener on the other side of the fence when It's not. Remember how the basketball program was when they didn't resign DR. Tom Davis? Steve Alford, Lickleiter. and it took Fran how many year to rebuild? Remember. Not every football recruit wants to go to Iowa nor does every coach want to coach at Iowa. Also with what's going on with Iowa football it's going to be even harder to find a good coaching staff. Look how many coaches turned down the Mich. St. job because whats going on there. Bad Bad idea
Go away.Talking with a fellow board member last night and we are both in agreement that it doesn't seem likely we will have football this year. So I presented this:
We know KF has a handful of years left with the program in the best of circumstances, he and I are in agreement BF sunk his bid to be the next HC so realiatically you are talking about a total rebuild. If we skip '20 instead of having an off year and then going through a rebuild in 3-4 years just take the lump now during a year of no football and create the easiest transition possible. What say you? If there is no football in '20 would it be a bad idea to blow it up and start over in the year off?
Edit* Oil brought up a good point early in this convo. Im talking about a staff rebuild here. We ARE in a great place from a roster standpoint which would help transition the new coach. We dont have to find ourselves in a "bare cupboard" situation.
LOL gotta love it. you're forcing me to respond. answer:Until he wins another Big title or Brian is ready to take over in a few years. I think he's enjoying the way Iowa's changing from "too predictable" to "Let's see what they do here" He's winning and he know it's getting better. I owe you a beerYes he and i were enjoying a couple brews while talking.
How long do you think KF sticks around for?
4 to 5 more years.I would be really interested to know how long those who are so opposed to this train of thought think KF is around for.
Counter point: is it worth waiting until the cupboards go bare before making the change?Iowa is finally in a position to compete on both sides of the ball and you want to get rid of KF now? Wtf? He is making changes to his staff to be better recruiters and coaches. I think KF is aging and getting better. Iowa will compete for West and the B1G title on a regular basis now and into the future. Let’s just enjoy the ride with KF at the helm making the right calls to improve the program from a competitive and diversity standpoint.
So where in that statement does that make it a good idea to run KF? And for what? Even 99% of the guys who had complaints don't want him ousted. The only few who may are malcontents and have been outed for their outright lies, and questionable reasons. Has he had plenty of time to win a lot of games, sure he has, and quite frankly he could have lost most of those games as well, so lets not make some stupid argument that his record means nothing because he's been here 20 years.We have hired 2 guys in the last 40 years. The "coaching carousel" or "what it says" after 20 years seems a bit overblown to me. The coaches understand this is a business also and while he may have racked up a bunch of wins he has certainly had the time to do it also.
Counter point: is it worth waiting until the cupboards go bare before making the change?
(I dont want to get rid of KF I just could see a good strategy in making the transition during a year of no football. As I sit here at 5 pm I personally am of the belief that if the powers to be think he stays 4+ after covid, keep him. If he is here 3 or less take the lump all at once, but I could see both sides and love discussing)
Talking with a fellow board member last night and we are both in agreement that it doesn't seem likely we will have football this year. So I presented this:
We know KF has a handful of years left with the program in the best of circumstances, he and I are in agreement BF sunk his bid to be the next HC so realiatically you are talking about a total rebuild. If we skip '20 instead of having an off year and then going through a rebuild in 3-4 years just take the lump now during a year of no football and create the easiest transition possible. What say you? If there is no football in '20 would it be a bad idea to blow it up and start over in the year off?
Edit* Oil brought up a good point early in this convo. Im talking about a staff rebuild here. We ARE in a great place from a roster standpoint which would help transition the new coach. We dont have to find ourselves in a "bare cupboard" situation.
Lol, how exactly do you blowup the whole staff and think kids who committed to those coaches would stay?I know people hate the reminder but moving Tom Davis along didn’t work out so well. Why risk what you have for some dream vision of a new staff sweeping in. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. Even with the recent issues, outside maybe 30 former players, everyone else seems to think iowa ain’t that bad. For every player ripping the program, 10 more aren’t complaining.Talking with a fellow board member last night and we are both in agreement that it doesn't seem likely we will have football this year. So I presented this:
We know KF has a handful of years left with the program in the best of circumstances, he and I are in agreement BF sunk his bid to be the next HC so realiatically you are talking about a total rebuild. If we skip '20 instead of having an off year and then going through a rebuild in 3-4 years just take the lump now during a year of no football and create the easiest transition possible. What say you? If there is no football in '20 would it be a bad idea to blow it up and start over in the year off?
Edit* Oil brought up a good point early in this convo. Im talking about a staff rebuild here. We ARE in a great place from a roster standpoint which would help transition the new coach. We dont have to find ourselves in a "bare cupboard" situation.
Do you like to see your threads? You made a point but just keep asking the same question over and over. Please give it a rest.Valid. Do you see anyway of avoiding this in the next 4-6 years anyway though?
Does it hurt you to answer? Right in the feels? Its a simple question, how long? If you don't want to participate, don't.Do you like to see your threads? You made a point but just keep asking the same question over and over. Please give it a rest.
One of the dumbest ideas I've heard in a while... and there have been some really dumb ones lately. One of the main reasons these great recruiting classes chose the Hawkeyes is KF and the consistency of our coaching staff. Let's clean house. They'll love that!
Well you don’t want the cupboard to be bare for the next staff. And stuff.
I do not think this has stopped BF from becoming HC, but it has delayed it.
WTF are you talking about?Where does the money come from for Kirk’s buyout?
I don't see where a year of zero football has anything to do with it. KF isn't leaving prior to this year's season (whether it's played or not) so you are really talking about an off season retirement with or without football being played this year.My thoughts exactly, so wouldn't it make sense to do it during a year of 0 football instead of 0 football and then a hit shortly after?
WTF are you talking about?
NP although I think the OPs question is ludicrous.Did you read the OP’s original post? Summary, If zero football this year he wants to know if we should blow up the coaching staff and start fresh, Hence, Who is going to pay for Kirk’s buyout, That is WTF I’m talking about.
This is about as stupid an idea that a person could possibly have.
Just really, really dumb.
bump to see how people feel now that no football is a real thing.
blow it up and start over? sounds stupidTalking with a fellow board member last night and we are both in agreement that it doesn't seem likely we will have football this year. So I presented this:
We know KF has a handful of years left with the program in the best of circumstances, he and I are in agreement BF sunk his bid to be the next HC so realiatically you are talking about a total rebuild. If we skip '20 instead of having an off year and then going through a rebuild in 3-4 years just take the lump now during a year of no football and create the easiest transition possible. What say you? If there is no football in '20 would it be a bad idea to blow it up and start over in the year off?
Edit* Oil brought up a good point early in this convo. Im talking about a staff rebuild here. We ARE in a great place from a roster standpoint which would help transition the new coach. We dont have to find ourselves in a "bare cupboard" situation.