ADVERTISEMENT

Opinion: The GOP’s strategy on the Jan. 6 select committee will likely backfire

cigaretteman

HR King
May 29, 2001
77,412
58,898
113
Opinion by
Jennifer Rubin
Columnist
Today at 12:15 p.m. EDT


No one should be surprised that House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) — one of the disgraced former president’s most cringeworthy supplicants — chose to appoint three House members for the select committee on Jan. 6 who voted to overthrow the election and opposed the formation of a bipartisan commission.

McCarthy, who experienced an initial spasm of patriotism and honesty in January when he admitted that the failed Republican nominee “bears responsibility” for the attack, quickly reverted to form. He voted against impeachment and supported the ouster of Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) from her leadership position in the Republican Party because she had the temerity to insist her party stop lying about the election results and hold the instigator in chief responsible for his assault on democracy. McCarthy subsequently opposed a Jan. 6 bipartisan commission, and he refuses to take action against those in his party who lie about the severity and purpose of the attempted coup.
McCarthy’s appointment of Republican Reps. Jim Jordan of Ohio, Jim Banks of Indiana and Troy E. Nehls of Texas to the select committee (as well as Republicans Rodney Davis of Illinois and Kelly Armstrong of North Dakota) is par for the course for McCarthy. Jordan, Banks and Nehls all voted to overthrow the election results on Jan. 6, further evidence of McCarthy’s spineless adoption of Trumpian lies and authoritarianism. (Remember: A vote for a Republican for the House in 2022 is a vote to install Donald Trump’s pawn, McCarthy, as speaker and empower him to overturn the 2024 election results if they again show a Democratic winner.)



Banks immediately proved his unfitness for this position with a written rant declaring, “If Democrats were serious about investigating political violence, this committee would be studying not only the Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol, but also the hundreds of violent political riots last summer when many more innocent Americans and law-enforcement officers were attacked. … Make no mistake, [House Speaker] Nancy Pelosi created this committee solely to malign conservatives and to justify the Left’s authoritarian agenda.” Pelosi has every right to reject his appointment; Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.) would be an excellent substitute.
The appointment of these unserious and unhinged MAGA members may be a great way for McCarthy to endear himself to his party’s cult leader, but once again, he might be doing his members no favors. Consider that a recent CBS poll showed 72 percent of Americans think there is more to learn about the insurrection. Moreover, 67 percent think it was an attempt to “overturn the election and keep Donald Trump in power.” The vast majority of Americans who understand the threat posed by the insurrection will now see the GOP’s reaction as mocking, disruptive, dishonest and contemptuous of the lives of law enforcement and of democracy itself.
The three members who tried to subvert our democracy will properly be seen as the face of the Trumpian Republican Party. One can only imagine them becoming the favorite faces in Democratic ads for the 2022 cycle: “Do you trust these people to defend our democracy?”






ADVERTISING


Specifically, the antics of the GOP members on the commission will be a vivid reminder to “Red Dogs” — those who traditionally identify as Republican but voted for President Biden in 2020 — as to why their former party cannot be entrusted with power. Some 74 percent of Republicans still strongly or somewhat disapprove of the Jan. 6 rioters, according to the CBS poll. What are they to make of their former party’s shenanigans in downplaying the event, attempting to turn the commission into an inquest on its intended victims (including Pelosi, who was an intended target of the MAGA insurrectionists) and continuing to defend the former president who set the assault’s wheels in motion? One would hope it will be enough to persuade them to extend their sojourn in the Democratic coalition.
Ironically, the select committee will start hearings just as the first of the insurrections face sentencing for their crimes. Several have already candidly admitted they came to the Capitol with the intent to overthrow the government, believing they were doing Trump’s bidding. Meanwhile, the likes of Jordan and others have insisted this was much ado about nothing, the work of antifa or Pelosi’s fault. The Republicans’ antics may be infuriating, but their performance will go a long way toward cementing the Republican Party’s identity as a compulsively dishonest, anti-democratic party.
UPDATE: Pelosi on Wednesday rejected both Jordan and Banks, prompting McCarthy to withdraw his three other appointees. Apparently only one side considers an investigation into an attempted insurrection to be of sufficient seriousness to review free from provocateurs and proponents of the “big lie.”

 
  • Haha
Reactions: haw-key
The Republicans are in a no win situation. They can't be aggressive since they are on the losing side. Yet they have to be aggressive for their base, which is comprised of mindless idiots. It's binary, so they're preaching to the choir of boneheads, while ostracizing the audience they need to expand support.

The price they pay for a bizarre subservience to an Orange clown.
 
The Republicans are in a no win situation. They can't be aggressive since they are on the losing side. Yet they have to be aggressive for their base, which is comprised of mindless idiots. It's binary, so they're preaching to the choir of boneheads, while ostracizing the audience they need to expand support.

The price they pay for a bizarre subservience to an Orange clown.
Hot take right here.
 
Opinion by
Jennifer Rubin
Columnist
Today at 12:15 p.m. EDT


No one should be surprised that House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) — one of the disgraced former president’s most cringeworthy supplicants — chose to appoint three House members for the select committee on Jan. 6 who voted to overthrow the election and opposed the formation of a bipartisan commission.

McCarthy, who experienced an initial spasm of patriotism and honesty in January when he admitted that the failed Republican nominee “bears responsibility” for the attack, quickly reverted to form. He voted against impeachment and supported the ouster of Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) from her leadership position in the Republican Party because she had the temerity to insist her party stop lying about the election results and hold the instigator in chief responsible for his assault on democracy. McCarthy subsequently opposed a Jan. 6 bipartisan commission, and he refuses to take action against those in his party who lie about the severity and purpose of the attempted coup.
McCarthy’s appointment of Republican Reps. Jim Jordan of Ohio, Jim Banks of Indiana and Troy E. Nehls of Texas to the select committee (as well as Republicans Rodney Davis of Illinois and Kelly Armstrong of North Dakota) is par for the course for McCarthy. Jordan, Banks and Nehls all voted to overthrow the election results on Jan. 6, further evidence of McCarthy’s spineless adoption of Trumpian lies and authoritarianism. (Remember: A vote for a Republican for the House in 2022 is a vote to install Donald Trump’s pawn, McCarthy, as speaker and empower him to overturn the 2024 election results if they again show a Democratic winner.)



Banks immediately proved his unfitness for this position with a written rant declaring, “If Democrats were serious about investigating political violence, this committee would be studying not only the Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol, but also the hundreds of violent political riots last summer when many more innocent Americans and law-enforcement officers were attacked. … Make no mistake, [House Speaker] Nancy Pelosi created this committee solely to malign conservatives and to justify the Left’s authoritarian agenda.” Pelosi has every right to reject his appointment; Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.) would be an excellent substitute.
The appointment of these unserious and unhinged MAGA members may be a great way for McCarthy to endear himself to his party’s cult leader, but once again, he might be doing his members no favors. Consider that a recent CBS poll showed 72 percent of Americans think there is more to learn about the insurrection. Moreover, 67 percent think it was an attempt to “overturn the election and keep Donald Trump in power.” The vast majority of Americans who understand the threat posed by the insurrection will now see the GOP’s reaction as mocking, disruptive, dishonest and contemptuous of the lives of law enforcement and of democracy itself.
The three members who tried to subvert our democracy will properly be seen as the face of the Trumpian Republican Party. One can only imagine them becoming the favorite faces in Democratic ads for the 2022 cycle: “Do you trust these people to defend our democracy?”






ADVERTISING


Specifically, the antics of the GOP members on the commission will be a vivid reminder to “Red Dogs” — those who traditionally identify as Republican but voted for President Biden in 2020 — as to why their former party cannot be entrusted with power. Some 74 percent of Republicans still strongly or somewhat disapprove of the Jan. 6 rioters, according to the CBS poll. What are they to make of their former party’s shenanigans in downplaying the event, attempting to turn the commission into an inquest on its intended victims (including Pelosi, who was an intended target of the MAGA insurrectionists) and continuing to defend the former president who set the assault’s wheels in motion? One would hope it will be enough to persuade them to extend their sojourn in the Democratic coalition.
Ironically, the select committee will start hearings just as the first of the insurrections face sentencing for their crimes. Several have already candidly admitted they came to the Capitol with the intent to overthrow the government, believing they were doing Trump’s bidding. Meanwhile, the likes of Jordan and others have insisted this was much ado about nothing, the work of antifa or Pelosi’s fault. The Republicans’ antics may be infuriating, but their performance will go a long way toward cementing the Republican Party’s identity as a compulsively dishonest, anti-democratic party.
UPDATE: Pelosi on Wednesday rejected both Jordan and Banks, prompting McCarthy to withdraw his three other appointees. Apparently only one side considers an investigation into an attempted insurrection to be of sufficient seriousness to review free from provocateurs and proponents of the “big lie.”

Pelosi shouldn’t get to pick who the opposition party puts on the committee. Sorry. I like the move by McCarthy.
 
Forgetting of course, that McCarthy blocked a previous version of this commission that would have had equal membership and would have been as close to fully bipartisan as you can get.
“Given the political misdirections that have marred this process, given the now duplicative and potentially counterproductive nature of this effort, and given the Speaker’s shortsighted scope that does not examine interrelated forms of political violence in America, I cannot support this legislation," McCarthy said in a statement.
 
“Given the political misdirections that have marred this process, given the now duplicative and potentially counterproductive nature of this effort, and given the Speaker’s shortsighted scope that does not examine interrelated forms of political violence in America, I cannot support this legislation," McCarthy said in a statement.
So, because the Democrats wouldn’t let the GOP muck up the 1/6 committee with unrelated investigations into things that had nothing at all to do with the events of 1/6 - including the 2017 shooting of Scalise, it’s okay for McCarthy to torpedo a bipartisan commission?

and again, that bill was negotiated by and agreed upon by both a republican (I’m forgetting his name, but he was deputized by McCarthy to get the best deal possible) and a Democrat. It was a good agreement, and would have led to as fair and unbiased investigation of 1/6 as we could have asked for.
 
“Given the political misdirections that have marred this process, given the now duplicative and potentially counterproductive nature of this effort, and given the Speaker’s shortsighted scope that does not examine interrelated forms of political violence in America, I cannot support this legislation," McCarthy said in a statement.
Basically a nonsense reason.
 
Basically a nonsense reason.

Where's McCarthy coming with a duplicative effort. Double speak (no pun intended). There is no reason or excuse to dismiss a congressionally mandated investigation. The implications are such that members of congress were involved in the planning and execution of the Jan 6 events, along with WH and possibly other officials and branches and offices.

How deeply rooted and widely spread the the conspiracy will be determined. This will take more than prosecutorial powers than the DoJ has, as we found with the Mueller investigation. We found that when things were taken to being were distasteful, nothing progressed, and details known and the time and reported, were substantiated later. Or, the program itself was designed to prevent pursuit of investigations and indictments.

The ideal format or approach would have created an independent commission, bipartisan in composition. The Republicans should have accepted this proposal and lived with the consequences. They would have taken their lumps, and had their chance to purge their ranks of deviants. Now they are doubling down on complicity and increasing culpability.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT