Opinion What Biden could gain from pardoning Trump

cigaretteman

HR King
May 29, 2001
72,197
51,877
113
It’s anyone’s guess how the federal investigations around Donald Trump will intersect with the former president’s political ambitions. It’s possible no indictment will be filed and Trump won’t run again. It’s also possible he will be indicted on charges related to the 2020 election, the handling of government documents, or both; that he will mount a third presidential campaign, and that America’s 2024 election will be clouded by the incumbent administration’s novel prosecution of a rival candidate of a major party.

Sign up for a weekly roundup of thought-provoking ideas and debates
There’s an endgame that would avert that destabilizing prospect: If Attorney General Merrick Garland’s Justice Department indicts Trump, President Biden could intervene with the exercise of his pardon power.
Hear me out. I’m not naive enough to think modern politicians are in the habit of sacrificing their own political interests to reduce polarization or strengthen “norms.” But it isn’t clear that pardoning Trump would hurt Biden politically. On the contrary, making such a startling move could put the weary president back in the center of the political universe, scramble political alignments and make his former rival — if he accepts the humbling offer — appear small and weak.






ADVERTISING


Put to one side the grave criminal scenarios in which Trump was using classified material for blackmail or some other sinister purpose, or secretly directing rioters to assault police at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, and assume the indictment is based largely on what is already known. Biden would announce, after reviewing the charges in detail, that he has nothing but contempt for Trump and that he is offering a pardon precisely because has no doubt about his (or another Democratic nominee’s) ability to rout the former president in an election, if it comes to that.

Follow Jason Willick's opinionsFollow

But Biden would express his concern, as the ultimate custodian of America’s national interest, about the precedent set by an election-year prosecution that rests in part on untested legal theories about obstruction or document classification by a sitting president. Trump’s acceptance of the pardon would enable Biden’s allies to make political hay of the (dubious) claim that this amounts to a recognition of guilt.
There’s no guarantee, after all, that a prosecution would prevent Trump from mounting a credible campaign for president in 2024 — and it might even help him win the Republican nomination, putting a second term within reach.



One of Trump’s most potent appeals to Republican primary voters is the claim that Democrats want to suppress and criminalize their opposition, and that this requires an extraordinary electoral response from the GOP. A pardon would partially preempt this claim, while a grinding prosecution would produce unending news cycles that Trump could use to dominate a primary.
Derived from medieval English kings, the president’s vast constitutional power to pardon is one of the most monarchical that he exercises. The 18th-century English jurist William Blackstone observed that the king’s pardon power functioned because he “acts in a superior sphere” from the rest of the body politic. Biden’s offer of mercy to an opponent would temporarily situate him above America’s warring partisan fiefdoms — dramatically displaying his power to call off, at least for the time being, his own party’s ultras.
Of course, the regal roots of the pardon power mean it sits uneasily alongside the small-d democratic verity that “no one is above the law.” But it speaks to the fact that even in a representative government, political judgment and statesmanship are necessary to sustaining the law’s operation.







Biden takes pride in the independence of his Justice Department, but Garland is not the head of a separate branch of government. In indicting Trump, the department’s prosecutors would be making a political decision of great consequence — but one that Biden has delegated to them and that he has final authority to void.
No matter what Garland decides, close to half of the country might have its faith in the Justice Department shaken by the Trump probe — either because it ends in prosecution or because it does not. A Biden reprieve of Trump (once Garland’s investigation is finished) would pull the Justice Department out of this political vise, helping to sustain its reputation. Progressive dismay would be redirected from the Justice Department as an institution and toward the political process.
This progressive dismay, of course, is one reason a pardon is such a remote possibility. The Biden White House is not one for daring gestures, and it might not care that an indictment helps Trump if Democrats see him as the easiest candidate to beat in a general election. But depending on the charges and context, a pardon could also diminish Trump in a primary, deflating his grievances and making him appear in debt to the magnanimity of his successor.
At the very least, this thought experiment should underscore that if Trump is indicted, the line separating the nation’s legal and political institutions will crumble. As head of the executive branch, Biden sits at the nexus of the two. He could have a unique opportunity to exploit that position to the country’s advantage — and his own.

 
Feb 9, 2013
19,831
55,263
113
If Trump broke the law, he needs to be punished. There's no benefit to granting him a pardon. We already enable too much bad behavior. There needs to be consequences, or we send a message that it's acceptable.
Yes, if there’s substance here and enough to charge him they need to do it. Otherwise, don’t.

But granting him a pardon before prosecution seems worst of all worlds. The author’s faulty premise is that a pardon would make Trump go away. I think that belief is incorrect and not warranted based on how Trump has always operated.
 

binsfeldcyhawk2

HR Legend
Gold Member
Oct 13, 2006
26,385
35,212
113
Yes, if there’s substance here and enough to charge him they need to do it. Otherwise, don’t.

But granting him a pardon before prosecution seems worst of all worlds. The author’s faulty premise is that a pardon would make Trump go away. I think that belief is incorrect and not warranted based on how Trump has always operated.
Not only that but it'd raise serious questions about the validity of the indictment itself.....pretty convenient to have the stain of an indictment of Trump without having to prove it in court.

If you're gonna indict...it's all in at that point. It's the Rubicon IMO......once it's crossed it's game on....have to see it to it's conclusion or it just raises all kinds of questions and solves nothing.
 

Finance85

HR Legend
Oct 22, 2003
18,184
19,554
113
Yes, if there’s substance here and enough to charge him they need to do it. Otherwise, don’t.

But granting him a pardon before prosecution seems worst of all worlds. The author’s faulty premise is that a pardon would make Trump go away. I think that belief is incorrect and not warranted based on how Trump has always operated.
I think a pardon would actually embolden Trump.
 
Feb 9, 2013
19,831
55,263
113
I think a pardon would actually embolden Trump.
He will always say that any prosecution is a hoax and the prosecutors are corrupt, and them offering him a pardon is proof they have no case. None of it needs to make sense for his followers will buy it.
 

Chishawk1425

HR Legend
Nov 27, 2019
48,002
81,878
113
Mike Myers No GIF
 

sadiehawkins

HR All-American
Sep 21, 2008
3,323
3,956
113
biden not reclassifying marijuana, then go out and say how it's such an injustice for Greiner to be in prison in Russia. While thousands of Americans sit in jail for marijuana in the US I about want to puke. How about a pardon for those people? That's the injustice? That there is telling me not to vote for democrats. But to the question, if he pardons trump i think the independents and progressives would revolt against the dems. I m considering not voting for dems because of the pot laws. But throw a pardon to trump I'm done with the Democrats.
 

ft254

HR Legend
Gold Member
Jun 3, 2003
14,737
12,406
113
Congress needs to visit Presidential emollients and pardons authority after this shithead.

The best way is to require line-item congressional approval or some way to prevent the carte blanche abuse imposed by the Orange Turd.

Emollients is another issue stretched beyond the limit by the Orange Turd. The hundreds of millions of tax dollars stuck to the public by this con man can't be recovered but Congress can impose restrictions to prevent future criminal fleecing and placid approval by a cowardly Congress.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman

Latest posts